Channel
@wdaxiao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
237subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003176508520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wdaxiao |
| Created | 26 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wdaxiao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:15 | 237 | +12 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 225 | no change |
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:48 | 225 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 26 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (26 November 2025 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 229 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
东莞师范大学报告 【验证留名】：wulin 【验证时间】：9/17 【妹子花名】: 安然 @naser759w 【联系方式】：东莞师范群内 【所在位置】：厚街万达 【修车水费】：600p 【身高身材】：165 【颜值相似】：基本一致 【凶器罩杯】：D 【服务内容】：课表都有 【推荐程度】：9.9 评分标准6分为及格-7分为良品（考虑价格可以看一看），8分 （值得价格，并且建议体验），9分 （实为该价位中少见的精品）10分 （极品） 【服务体验】：非常舒服的一次体验，全身都比较自然，进门一看是我喜欢的姐姐的类型，递上水然后聊聊天，整个人放松下来后，进入到浴室，大蟒蛇，水中萧，深🐒，泡泡浴，AB面直接满上，戴上眼镜👓，进入到正题，69，蟒蛇无限，老师还会告诉你她哪里敏感，先女上，旋转差点出来了，然后换上传教士，然后转战客厅，沙发，椅子，镜子前，解锁了超多姿势，最后再来一波冲刺和老师双双进入G点，老师情绪价值超好，每个人间隔时间久…
东莞师范大学 【验证留名】：winner 【验证时间】：9.27 【妹子花名】:茉莉 【联系方式】：东莞师范群内 【所在位置】：常平 【修车水费】：600p 【身高身材】：163 【颜值相似】：9 【凶器罩杯】：36d 【服务内容】：该有的都有 【服务详情】： 【机车行为】： 【推荐程度】：9 评分标准6分为及格-7分为良品（考虑价格可以看一看），8分 （值得价格，并且建议体验），9分 （实为该价位中少见的精品）10分 （极品） 【服务体验】：（环境好不好？服务是否划水？骚不骚？过程体验如何？有没有催人不耐烦货态度行不行等等……） 注‼️：报告仅供参考❗️萝卜青菜各有所爱❗️请选择适合自己的老师❗️ 【总结】：刚进门热情如火，大奶子真实36d，大屁股，课表上的服务全部都有，全程没有催钟，因为我上满了整节课。特别推荐老师的口技，技术一流嘴巴会转弯深喉差点就交待了，进入正题做爱环节，本人比较持久老师全程配合姿势简直不要太舒服跟做皇…
东莞师范大学报告 【验证留名】：wulin 【验证时间】：9/17 【妹子花名】: 弄弄 【联系方式】：东莞师范群内 【所在位置】：松山湖 【修车水费】：600p 【身高身材】：165 【颜值相似】：基本一致 【凶器罩杯】：C 【服务内容】：写的基本都有 【推荐程度】：9.9 评分标准6分为及格-7分为良品（考虑价格可以看一看），8分 （值得价格，并且建议体验），9分 （实为该价位中少见的精品）10分 （极品） 【服务体验】：刚进门就被老师惊艳到，长得比较高挑，硕果细支的身材，付了水费之后，马上就进入到浴室的主题，在浴室里面就来一波亲密接触，就已经硬梆梆了，然后再进入到卧室，👄的差点爆了，每一次都在挑逗刺激，先来女上，还在外面先磨一下，实在忍不住了，就要求进来，然后一边🐍一边做，后续自行脑补哈，换了3-4个姿势，最后闹钟响了也不催钟，还是出水了，下次来个不限时的可以试一下各个地方，推荐推荐～ 注‼️：报告仅供参考❗️萝卜青菜…
❤1
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «东莞师范报告榜（黑红榜）»
东莞师范大学 【验证留名】：滴滴 【验证时间】：9/11 【妹子花名】: 小梦 【联系方式】： @xiaomeng5359 【所在位置】：东莞东城 【修车水费】：700P 【身高身材】：163 【颜值相似】：9 【凶器罩杯】：C 【服务内容】：课本 【服务详情】：约好了时间，根据定位到达老师的位置，见到老师第一眼还不错，颜值身材很好，老师看到我有些拘谨，陪我聊了会天缓解我的情绪，真的十分体贴，女友感满满。随后简单冲洗了一下，上床享受老师的服务，老师很主动指导和我调情，口的时候我也很舒服，差点被口出来了，赶快带上小雨伞进入主题，老师女上很有力度也会摇，下面很紧温暖，特别是胸摇晃着受不了，老师在下面换了几个姿势，老师叫的受不了，最后成功出货，还要回锅。 【机车行为】：无 【推荐程度】：9 评分标准6分为及格-7分为良品（考虑价格可以看一看），8分 （值得价格，并且建议体验），9分 （实为该价位中少见的精品）10分 （极品） …
❤1
Channel name was changed to «东莞师范报告榜»
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @wdaxiao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东莞师范报告榜（黑红榜）” (@wdaxiao), 237 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wdaxiao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.