Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net -557. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,066–3,791 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 13:40
3,150
-11
5 Nov 2026, 15:25
3,161
-21
2 Nov 2026, 20:16
3,182
-15
31 Oct 2026, 01:56
3,197
-12
28 Oct 2026, 12:39
3,209
-16
25 Oct 2026, 11:37
3,225
-20
22 Oct 2026, 09:07
3,245
-17
19 Oct 2026, 04:58
3,262
-18
16 Oct 2026, 08:29
3,280
-18
13 Oct 2026, 03:18
3,298
-29
6 Oct 2026, 16:17
3,327
-37
29 Sept 2026, 13:15
3,364
-49
19 Sept 2026, 07:39
3,413
-28
14 Sept 2026, 20:36
3,441
-21
11 Sept 2026, 03:37
3,462
-26
6 Sept 2026, 11:40
3,488
-29
1 Sept 2026, 21:23
3,517
-16
30 Aug 2026, 06:24
3,533
-22
27 Aug 2026, 09:43
3,555
-23
24 Aug 2026, 13:09
3,578
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 15 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
255 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
68
26.7%
💘
49
19.2%
❤🔥
22
8.63%
💋
19
7.45%
🤩
19
7.45%
💯
18
7.06%
🔥
16
6.27%
😍
14
5.49%
💔
10
3.92%
🍓
9
3.53%
👍
6
2.35%
👎
5
1.96%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ого, какие находки по низким ценам 😱
Загляните — классные солнцезащитные очки Miu Miu, просто огонь!
🐚https://ya.cc/9VsNPo
А ещё аромат L'Erbolario с белым ирисом — нежность и элегантность в каждой ноте
🪷https://ya.cc/9VsNPR
Ещё одни крутые очки Miu Miu — блеск и стиль
🌱https://ya.cc/9VsNNg
Givenchy L’Interdit — аромат, который не оставит равнодушным!
🌺https://ya.cc/9VsNQ9
Краска для волос Bouticle Expert Color …
Шикарные находки для стильных красоток 😍
Золотые серьги PLATINA Jewelry — роскошь и блеск!
♨️https://ya.cc/9Mo8xH
L'INSTANT DE — для настоящих ценителей!
♨️https://ya.cc/9Mo8xc
Dolce & Gabbana The One for Men — мужской аромат, который не оставит равнодушным
♨️https://ya.cc/9Mo8y6
Belweder Protecteur — бальзам для губ с маслом сладкого апельсина, ухаживает и защищает
♨️https://ya.cc/9Mo8yh
Парфюмерная вода Blanch…
Эта прелесть от магазина okudzhava.brand.888 🤩✨🤎
🩷Сумка Guess оригинал 9000₽
🤩Палетка Hourglass 14000₽
🤩Сумка Coach 15200₽
🤩BB крем невесты 5200₽
🤩Палетка Make Up For Ever 7300₽
🤩Черное мыло для лица и тела 5200₽
🤩Жидкие румяна от charlotte tilbury 4400₽
🤩Успокаивающий мист с гидролатом риса и пантенолом 1700₽
🤩Кеды Guess 10000₽
Ставь «🤩», если понравилась подборка
WB/OZON на каждый день
🤩9💋7💘7❤4
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @wbozonday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Your style | wb/ozon” (@wbozonday), 3,150 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wbozonday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.