14 Jan 2026, 13:44 UTC29 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @WBCCGOLDPhoto
еще и такое бывает :)) Хорошо что умеем удивлять)) Все отработки взяты из нашей новой услуги: 💎 ALL IN VIP
Channel
Отзывы о WBCCLUB
@wbccfeedback
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
132subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001302295893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wbccfeedback |
| Description | Собираем отзывы о работе наших продуктов с 2019 года из нашего чата: https://t.me/+ObjBBsjLET4xMWUy :) Опыт трейдинга WBCC с 2012 года! 💼 VIP подписки: @wbccpaybot ➡️Admin: @wbcc_club |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wbccfeedback |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 132 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 132 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 28 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 289
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 8
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
13 Jan 2026, 10:20 UTC28 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @WBCCGOLDPhoto
Давно непостили отзывы)) Вот один из о наших услугах :) Спасибо за Отзыв! Все отработки взяты из нашей новой услуги: 💎 ALL IN VIP
20 Nov 2025, 16:46 UTC32 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @WBCCGOLDPhoto
Очередные отработочки и отзывы о нашем новом продукте ALLIN!
19 Nov 2025, 17:15 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @WBCCGOLDPhoto
Приятные отзывы от наших подписчиков) по работе на ALLIN! Все кто с нами и ценит наш труд, всем спасибо!
25 Jun 2025, 14:25 UTC61 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @WBCCGOLDPhoto
Отзыв от подпсичика, по нашей услуге #БА (Быстрая аналитика) Приятно всегда видеть профиты своих подписчиков! Вы молодцы :)
23 Jun 2025, 21:09 UTC417 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo
Давно небыло по БА отзывов))
16 Jun 2025, 19:21 UTC639 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo
Индикатор решает))) Позы еще держу, стопы уже в плюсе стоят)))
16 Jun 2025, 05:50 UTC614 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo
Ну как то так в общем))) Спасибо сапорту👍
14 Jun 2025, 20:22 UTC304 viewsread 9 August 2026
Сколько лет следил до покупок за вами) сколько уже пользуюсь, все в лучшем виде, индикатор тоже развивается из разу в раз и большое спасибо, что развиваете продукт, а не сидите на лаврах)
14 Jun 2025, 20:15 UTC302 viewsread 9 August 2026
Шеф, в очередной раз респект за продукт! Wbcc как всегда лучшие!
23 Apr 2025, 15:07 UTC530 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo
Благодарочка клубу за продукт
9 Apr 2025, 20:53 UTC613 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo
суппорт очень хорошо себя показывает
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @wbccfeedback. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 895,598 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Отзывы о WBCCLUB” (@wbccfeedback), 132 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wbccfeedback.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.