🔹Анастасия, аспирант-международник
🔹Пишу кандидатскую по истории международных отношений и внешней политики в режиме реального времени
🔹Изучаю энергетическое сотрудничество 🇷🇺 и 🇫🇷
🔹Делюсь мыслями и находками
🔹https://dzen.ru/waytophd
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–59 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 06:31
58
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:22
58
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 13 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.8%
avg views ÷ 58 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
46.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held
15 (13 January 2026 – 28 July 2026)
Views total
26
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
66
Videos
1
Links
50
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
201 reactions across 15 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
64
31.8%
❤
23
11.4%
👍
20
9.95%
custom 5409015472517553802
13
6.47%
🏆
12
5.97%
custom 5303310030940952439
11
5.47%
custom 5458571342049714038
11
5.47%
👏
10
4.98%
💅
9
4.48%
🤣
5
2.49%
custom 5397821001037793704
4
1.99%
custom 5461160872321752023
3
1.49%
🆒
3
1.49%
😱
3
1.49%
🤔
3
1.49%
custom 5312359316580216113
2
0.995%
🍓
2
0.995%
💘
2
0.995%
💯
1
0.498%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 15 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @waytophd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 January 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Франция в урановом секторе Казахстана
Наконец дописала давно обещанный пост о французской модели присутствия в урановом секторе Казахстана и о том, почему военный переворот в Нигере резко усилил интерес Парижа к Центральной Азии.
Французская атомная отрасль выстроена вокруг трёх крупных государственных и квазигосударственных компаний:
🟣EDF эксплуатирует 56 атомных энергоблоков страны
🟣Orano отвечает за добычу, кон…
Пропадала некоторое время - готовилась к самому сложному (и последнему) экзамену по специальности. И, вуаля, сегодня я его сдала на отлично! 🥳
Кандидатский минимум в кармане, и больше никаких экзаменов! Впереди - только работа над диссертацией: планирую ускориться летом, чтобы к концу года уже был готовый текст. А потом уже сложные бюрократические процедуры, но об этом подумаю позже.
В ближайшее время выложу заверш…
Спешу поделиться небольшим профессиональным достижением: подготовила аналитическую заметку для статьи о возвращении атома в европейскую повестку для Forbes Russia. И даже цитаты есть!
Россия в урановом секторе Казахстана
В предыдущем посте я писала о том, почему Казахстан является ключевым центром мирового рынка урана. Теперь расскажу о роли России в этой системе.
Российская атомная стратегия реализуется через (surprise, surprise) «Росатом» - вертикально интегрированный холдинг, охватывающий практически весь ядерно-топливный цикл: от добычи урана до строительства и эксплуатации АЭС, включая пере…
Почему мировой рынок урана зависит от Казахстана
Недавно закончила статью про урановую конкуренцию России, Франции и Китая в Казахстане - скоро опубликуют, и я обязательно поделюсь. А пока хочу разобрать ключевые выводы исследования. Начну с базы. Сегодня мировой рынок урана во многом держится на трёх странах (World Nuclear Association):
🟣Казахстан
🟣Канада
🟣Намибия
На них приходится около 75% мировой добычи. Но кл…
🤨 Глава ЕК Урсула фон дер Ляйен исключила возможность разрешения на закупки российского газа странам ЕС даже в том случае, если в ЕС будет физическая нехватка энергоресурсов, которая приведет к отключениям энергии
В ответ на вопросы FT Ляйен отметила, что ЕС будет продолжать трансформацию энергетического сектора, переводя его на «зеленую и производимую в Европе энергию».
#Газ
Telegram | Max | Дзен | VK
Приглашаем на семинар Влияние событий в Персидском заливе на глобальные энергетические рынки и цели устойчивого развития
📌24 марта, 15:00 в Европейском и онлайн
Начиная со 2 марта Иран фактически закрыл судоходное движение через Ормузский пролив, что мгновенно превратило военный конфликт Израиля и США с Ираном в глобальный энергетический кризис
➡️На семинаре научные сотрудники и исследователи ИЦ ЭНЕРПО и Центра ис…
⚛️ «Отказаться от атома было стратегической ошибкой»: что Урсула фон дер Ляйен сказала о будущем Европы
Увидев вчера новость о «стратегической ошибке», решила посмотреть, что ещё
глава Еврокомиссии сказала на саммите по ядерной энергии в Париже, фактически переписав энергетическую стратегию ЕС. Если раньше Брюссель делал ставку только на «зелёную» энергетику, то теперь атом возвращается в игру.
И вот 5 главных тези…
Урсула фон дер Лейен: отказ Европы от атомной энергетики был стратегической ошибкой
"Если в 1990 году треть электроэнергии в Европе производилась за счет атомной энергии, то сегодня этот показатель составляет всего около 15%. Снижение доли атомной энергии было сознательным решением. Оглядываясь назад, можно сказать, что отказ Европы от надёжного и доступного источника энергии с низким уровнем выбросов оказался страт…
🔥 Вышел новый выпуск журнала ENERPO Journal!
В новом, 13-м выпуске ENERPO Journal: универсальная методология прогнозирования солнечной генерации на основе машинного обучения, сравнительный анализ экспортных стратегий российского газа, архитектура климатического финансирования в Центральной Азии, инновации для чистой энергии в Кыргызстане, гидрополитика и трансграничное управление водными ресурсами на примере Рогунск…
Вернётся ли TotalEnergies в Россию?
На фоне усиления риторики о переговорах по завершению украинского конфликта в СМИ всё чаще поднимается тема потенциального возвращения западного бизнеса в Россию. Интересно было услышать мнение главы TotalEnergies Патрика Пуянне о перспективах российского направления.
В интервью CNBC он подчеркнул: сегодня вопрос возвращения - «теоретический». Компания сохраняет доли в «Ямал СПГ»…
🔥7👏3❤2👍2💘1custom 54585713420497140381
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @waytophd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 550,752 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Записки о PhD | Россия. Франция. Энергетика” (@waytophd), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waytophd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
