Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Wavey Calls 🌊

@waveycalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,582subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001481236171
TypeChannel
Username@waveycalls
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/waveycalls

Growth

4,5824,6084,5957 August 2026 — 4,608 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,607 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,596 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,582 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,578–4,612 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:594,582-14
10 Aug 2026, 20:064,596-11
7 Aug 2026, 22:384,607-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:154,608first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 18 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.90%
avg views ÷ 4,582 subscribers
Avg views / post
408
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held21 (18 March 20269 August 2026)
Views total408
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC408 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The wait is almost over. $CHEESE HEAD is ready to hit the market. 0x696B057564C6b5251A1fD9b90FBf20C454E96666 🧀https://www.cheesepad.ai/sale/bsc/0x081b543827E46Dc784524f4D3fFa150Dc2cb71bd ➡️WHITELIST FOR TIER 1: First 10 minutes ➡️WHITELIST FOR TIER 2: Next 20 minutes ➡️TAX: 3% BUY / 3% SELL 🟡30 minutes of controlled launch → then the gates are OPEN. ⚠️Get your wallets ready. Get your BNB ready. ❕DON’T WAIT FOR

3 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC826 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

MAMEINU (BSC) mameinu went to 12m after launch, was on a dip earlier and now currently reversing, spoke to the dev and hes got exciting plans to push mame, hes already bought and burned 50bnb+ expecting mame to break ath soon. chart : https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x924f1a4422a89900faafa3f886721fdccd6e086a ✅: @mamebnb

2 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC798 viewsread 12 August 2026

dont think we see btc under 50k, seems like btc bottom is in.

1 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC762 viewsread 12 August 2026

Clean 10x for those that got into the presale and about 2x for launch buyers. https://www.dexview.com/bsc/0x020D6c73897651988438E1fED554964aBFfa6666 ✅: https://t.me/AsteroidSPCX

1 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC792 viewsread 12 August 2026

turned out to be a rug, the dev claimed to be the same person that launched jojo but was just a fake account.

1 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🧀🧀🧀WAKE THE FUCK UP‼️ $FLOKIA is coming 🔥 ⏰ Presale time: 07.01 11:00 (UTC+8) •50BNB HC 0.2BNB Max •3% $SPCX rewards •90% WL control •50% burn https://www.cheesepad.ai/sale/bsc/0xad2D4c6018c31CCE5cb20f7D480d29647667332c Launch time: 07.01 12:00 (UTC+8) 🧀Contract: 0xE60a5906B21b1c4E20F5bEfae2b025B136Fc6666 $JOJO ran hard with 80x $FLOKIA will get ___? First $SPCX dividend on Cheesepad The mysterious Eastern f

29 Jun 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 12 August 2026

presale filled smoothly, launching in 30 mins with taxes 6/6, starting marketing around 35k, they did mention plans to push so lets see. https://www.dexview.com/bsc/0x8053432430A9E0171271bA785716f23DD2fa6666

29 Jun 2026, 13:51 UTC924 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ASTEROID SHIBA (BSC) another presale that looks good is Asteroid Shiba on bsc. Asteroid shiba presale is being held very soon, alot of hype around it. The one on eth is doing very well which could cause fomo on this one too, its a reward token so you get tokens for holding ofcourse. Tax is 4/4. Presale Link: https://www.cheesepad.ai/sale/bsc/0x801025e75cF4959A19FEc4bCbC5ffca3FCceadE2 Launch ⏰ : 1st july 2PM UTC

29 Jun 2026, 10:30 UTC774 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

mame inu did very well and seems like it will continue to do so, BABYMAME is launching soon to follow the same path, expecting this one to do well too, presale goes live in 2.5 hours from now, launch starting marketing cap will be 30-40k so wouldnt be a bad idea to ape launch. presale link : https://www.cheesepad.ai/sale/bsc/0xBab6b7e355e8bf0CcedEDCB263eF8c752b38BC29 ✅: https://t.me/BabyMame_BNB

27 Jun 2026, 23:10 UTCviews —

Wavey Calls 🌊 pinned «STRC at 76 I think the biggest overhang of the market weakness is this situation Saylor has gotten himself into, i think we should see 48-52k BTC very soon.»

25 Jun 2026, 13:52 UTC964 viewsread 12 August 2026

STRC at 76 I think the biggest overhang of the market weakness is this situation Saylor has gotten himself into, i think we should see 48-52k BTC very soon.

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @waveycalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,320,241 of 1,212,465entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wavey Calls 🌊” (@waveycalls), 4,582 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waveycalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.