Channel
@watermelonaaaaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
126subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002338609550 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @watermelonaaaaa |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/watermelonaaaaa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 126 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 127 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 127 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 291 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
229 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 81 | 35.4% | |
| 🔥 | 76 | 33.2% | |
| 💔 | 59 | 25.8% | |
| custom 5449693283871655004 | 13 | 5.68% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @watermelonaaaaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
положение людей меняется с течением времени. Сам Всевышний сказал: «Мы чередуем дни (счастье и несчастье) для людей» [3:140]. в аяте сказано «мы чередуем», т.е. употреблен глагол в наст. времени, чтобы подчеркнуть, что это происходит ПОСТОЯННО. — Это обычай Всевышнего, установленный Им на все времена.
🔥4custom 54496932838716550042💔1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥5💔2custom 54496932838716550042
ты можешь быть причиной стойкости других, хотя и не знаешь этого: возможно кто-то наблюдает за тобой, а ты не знаешь этого; может быть чьё-то сердце укрепляется из-за тебя, а ты не знаешь этого. твоя стойкость не для тебя одного. она может повлиять на других и привести к их стойкости.
💔4⚡3🔥2
Имам Ибн аль-Каййим сказал: «Человеку надлежит тратить часы своей жизни, а даже каждый вдох, на то, что помогает достичь возвышенных целей и избавляет от очевидного убытка. Это возможно лишь через обращение к Корану, его понимание и глубокое размышление над ним, извлечение его сокровищ, выявление сокрытого, всецелое внимание к нему и усердное преданность ему. Ведь именно Коран гарантирует людям благо в религии, мирс…
⚡7💔4🔥3
رضي الله عنه..
⚡5💔2🔥2
можете ли вы представить, что Ад сам не может терпеть своего собственного жара и жалуется Аллаhу на жгучесть пламени, языки которого полыхают в его чреве! долины Ада настолько беспощадны и прожорливы, что не щадят даже самих себя. Пророк ﷺ сказал: «огонь пожаловался своему Господу и сказал: “Господи, я пожираю сам себя!” тогда ему было позволено делать два выдоха: один — зимой, а другой — летом. это — самая сильная …
🔥7⚡4💔4
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥6⚡5💔4
Однажды Юнуса бин Убайда постигло несчастье, и ему сказали: «Неужели Ибн Аун не пришёл к тебе?» Он ответил: «Поистине, если сердце убеждено в любви брата, то отсутствие его не причинит вреда». Посмотрите только, как они умели находить оправдание друг другу. Как бережно они относились к сердцам своих братьев, и как чисты были их души от упрёков, подозрений и поспешных выводов...
⚡5💔5🔥3
Сказал ибн Хазм, да помилует его Аллах: "Из желаемых причин в любви: чтобы Аллах, даровал человеку верного, искреннего друга, с приятной речью, скромного, с хорошими манерами, тонким пониманием, красноречивого, остроумного, обладающего великодушием, обширными знаниями, редко противоречащего, щедро помогающего, терпеливого к недостаткам, согласного во многом, различающего мнения, обладающего благими нравами, защищающ…
💔5🔥5⚡4custom 54496932838716550041
Сегодня многие «ухтишки» пытаются «подстроить» ислам под стандарты современной светской моды, объявляя запретное дозволенным ради показухи или одобрения общества. Попытки переписать шариат — это бессмысленное бодание скалы, которое приводится тут, например. Религия Аллаха совершенна и не нуждается в одобрении людей. Изменяя ее, человек только лишает себя благословения и милостей Аллаха, тем самым утопая в грехах.. О…
⚡5🔥4💔3custom 54496932838716550041
Мухаддис Хаммад аль-Ансари: Людей постигли некоторые беды по той причине, что они не читают сиру Пророка ﷺ, не размышляют и не действуют в соответствии с назиданием и поучением содержащимися в ней.
⚡7🔥2custom 54496932838716550042
представь, что наступает Судный день, и ты стоишь перед Аллаہом. Перед тобой разворачивается книга твоей жизни, и ты видишь все те моменты, когда ты выбирал что-то другое вместо намаза. Ты осознаешь, что каждое пропущенное поклонение - это упущенный шанс на милость, прощение и рай. Представь, каково это будет увидеть свои грехи, которые могли быть прощены, если бы ты лишь сделал один шаг к коврику для намаза. И тогда…
⚡5💔5🔥5custom 54496932838716550042
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @watermelonaaaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 735,626 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“блуждающий в милости Аллаهа” (@watermelonaaaaa), 126 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/watermelonaaaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.