2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,613–40,695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 06:22
40,654
no change
4 Sept 2026, 05:47
40,654
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 19 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
2
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
59 reactions across 2 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
47
79.7%
👍
6
10.2%
🙏
5
8.47%
👏
1
1.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2023 to 26 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @warp77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
💸 เจนนี่แจกทุนฟรี 50 ❗️100❗️1000🧧 (service) @meslot365 · 58,199 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 4 September 2026
𝐏𝐔𝐍𝐆𝟏𝟔𝟖𝟖𝐏𝐋𝐔𝐒 @pung1688plus · 47,273 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 September 2026
jdbaa channel @jdbaachannel · 36,098 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 4 September 2026
PP9.com | Thailand Official Channel® @pp9svip · 40,321 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 4 September 2026
Kplus666 @Kplus666 · 106,768 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 4 September 2026
𝐖𝐄𝟖𝟖 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 @we88z · 109,510 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 September 2026
𝐖𝐈𝐍𝐊𝟕𝟕𝟕𝐏𝐋𝐔𝐒 @wink777plus · 96,325 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
Win9999-ข้อมูลอย่างเป็นทางการ @Win9999com · 51,231 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“สล็อตแตกง่าย รองรับทรูวอเล็ท ไม่มีขั่นต่ำ 2026” (@warp77), 40,654 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warp77.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
