Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Warden Announcements

Channel

Warden Announcements

@warden_news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,634subscribers

-261 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002016289360
TypeChannel
Username@warden_news
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/warden_news

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,63415,89515,764.56 August 2026 — 15,895 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,895 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,889 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,875 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,826 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,810 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,805 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,798 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,787 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,786 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,785 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,778 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,775 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,768 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,764 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,759 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,757 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,748 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,742 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,734 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,733 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,723 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,715 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,705 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,697 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,696 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,678 subscribers9 September 2026 — 15,663 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,653 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,648 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,641 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,634 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -261. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,595–15,934 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:1715,634-7
15 Sept 2026, 09:0115,641-7
13 Sept 2026, 18:5515,648-5
11 Sept 2026, 22:2115,653-10
9 Sept 2026, 10:0215,663-15
6 Sept 2026, 04:5915,678-18
4 Sept 2026, 00:5515,696-1
2 Sept 2026, 15:0515,697-8
1 Sept 2026, 13:5315,705-10
31 Aug 2026, 16:1215,715-8
30 Aug 2026, 12:4315,723-10
28 Aug 2026, 12:4715,733-1
26 Aug 2026, 15:4815,734-8
25 Aug 2026, 13:3215,742-6
24 Aug 2026, 15:4415,748-9
23 Aug 2026, 02:5315,757-2
21 Aug 2026, 14:5815,759-5
20 Aug 2026, 14:4215,764-4
19 Aug 2026, 13:4715,768-7
18 Aug 2026, 12:4415,775first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 18 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.02%
avg views ÷ 15,634 subscribers
Avg views / post
316
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held25 (18 March 20262 September 2026)
Views total949
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

195 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥15177.4%
2512.8%
👍147.18%
21.03%
👏10.513%
💅10.513%
🙈10.513%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:19 UTC149 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Warden 2.0 is not a single product. Is the combination of products that elevate WARD > New Warden Token Terminal and Launchpad coming this September And many other things https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2095137992759292346 Read everything: https://wardenprotocol.org/blog/warden-2-0-ward-takes-the-floor

🔥6👍1

26 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC392 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Warden / Halo are now part of the Circle Alliance Alliance Program https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2092607089059234049

🔥5

24 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC408 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2091958266444292409

🔥8

9 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC532 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

We've written something for the community: a clearer picture of where our priorities are, and what the signal actually looks like underneath the noise of the last week. https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2086390362709303483

🔥5👍3👏1

6 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC411 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

HALO launches today at 13:00 UTC on Virtuals Direct DEX liquidity from minute one. LP locked 10 years. One link. No presale. Fair launch https://app.virtuals.io/virtuals/130418 Beware of scams that there are already circulating. Check contract address: HALO is an ERC20 on Base CA: 0xbbd27C575fB0e113219D610cc787B02Eeff71d42 https://basescan.org/address/0xbbd27C575fB0e113219D610cc787B02Eeff71d42 https://x.com/w

🔥61

4 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC355 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

The HALO whitepaper is here! Intelligence is becoming the most important resource of this century. Right now, access to it runs through a handful of companies. What Bitcoin did for money, Halo does for intelligence. https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2084609796951494724 https://runhalo.xyz/whitepaper

🔥9

30 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC419 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

The Warden Ecosystem is expanding. Growth is coming back home https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2082798745863815507

👍5

3 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC751 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔥 Largest $WARD burn to date: 3.8M tokens, gone from supply forever. Unclaimed airdrop tokens: burned. Strategic investor allocations: bought back and burned before hitting the market. Supply only moves one direction. Proof below 👇 https://explorer.wardenprotocol.org/tx/0x4646be941d1acf11882d02db57f7e2e33caaa2b96fda2ca9f3d872afb771c21f https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2072995795029180721

🔥105

30 Jun 2026, 13:53 UTC513 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Halo Alpha is here! https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2071955060523762140 https://runhalo.xyz

🔥12

16 Jun 2026, 11:40 UTC693 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026

We are getting Halo'ed https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2066847815859376549

🔥82

4 Jun 2026, 13:34 UTC770 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Check the demo video of Halo live! https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2062513361779048680

🔥2

22 May 2026, 13:53 UTC897 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

The Halo roadmap is public. Six monthly milestones. First alpha to full protocol. Foundation $WARD buyback starts in June. Automation in August. SPEX in September. Halo GA in November. Most of it is already built. This is the schedule for shipping it. https://x.com/wardenprotocol/status/2057821188160668140

🔥157

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @warden_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mantle Announcements
@mantlenews · 75,173
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Morph Layer Announcement
@MorphL2announcement · 652,234
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Self Chain
@selfchainxyz · 107,189
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
XDAO | Official channel 💠
@xdaoapp · 2,194,206
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
Rivalz Network Announcement
@RivalzAI_Ann · 48,895
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
Infinite Seas
@infiniteseasdev · 49,129
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
ZNS Connect Name Service
@znsconnect · 45,003
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Warden Announcements” (@warden_news), 15,634 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warden_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.