私信热门会员推荐号段:+84会员 +855会员 +261会员 +56会员 +62会员+998会员

Channel
万海致富
@wanhai2026
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003981089070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wanhai2026 |
| Created | 9 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wanhai2026 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 16 | +1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 15 | +13 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:23 | 2 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 2 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 78.1%
- avg views ÷ 16 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12.5
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (9 September 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 25 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Sept 2026, 12:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
一直在线出售台 日 韩 泰新老号📱一直在进步一直在努力 号质量优质价格优惠 只为更好的服务更多的老板 质量优先 价格其次一切好商量📱📱
Line上号须知⚠️: 1.使用本产品建议使用原生环境 (原生节点,设置的时间以及地区改为所在地)不使用安卓分身 2.由于line风控机制,登录到新设备的号,新的设备识别 新的ip 属于异地登录 建议养5到7天为一周期,后基本可正常使用(改id,拉群,加好友等功能) 3.尽量避免ip关联,也有批量扫号的可能 4.最好模仿正常用户使用 不要加太多人初期 实践证明初期模仿使用可以降低死亡概率 因为封号有一部分是由系统判断行为活动 5.❗️包首登 上号必须马上查验账号存活以及号码是否绑定 查活方法:(聊天页面 右上角加号点击会议功能 ) 能开启证明是活号 死号会提示涉嫌违规被封禁 重点❗️ 风控pc端 ,上号以后请不要立马登录电脑 容易秒死❗️ 如有出现加不了好友 请用最好的ip 例如 住宅ip纯净的 养2天即可恢复
万海致富 pinned «合作认准唯一🆔:@Whai2026»
合作认准唯一🆔:@Whai2026
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @wanhai2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“万海致富” (@wanhai2026), 16 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wanhai2026.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.