Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Калибр 3.5

@wandam11ch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,781subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002116114248
TypeChannel
Username@wandam11ch
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wandam11ch

Growth

1,7731,7811,7777 August 2026 — 1,773 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,773 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,781 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,772–1,782 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:321,781+8
7 Aug 2026, 20:491,773no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:331,773first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.5%
avg views ÷ 1,781 subscribers
Avg views / post
685
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total10,276
Reactions total298
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25m 52s
Average length
3m 14s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

298 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22776.2%
❤‍🔥237.72%
🔥155.03%
👍93.02%
🥰93.02%
👎41.34%
💋41.34%
31.01%
💘20.671%
👏10.336%
💊10.336%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wandam11ch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC307 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔥300кг 1х1 ✔️Самое интересное - сравнение. Того, как я тянул два месяца назад, и сейчас. В данный момент я тяну на ебанной резине - и конечно же создается дикое трение, из-за чего я просто трачу силы на срыв, очень тяжелый срыв, прям чувствуется, как диски трутся о ебанную резину. Поэтому и говорят, что мягкий гриф - ковролин. ➡️И два месяца назад - супер хард Хочется прям найти обувь норм и попробовать вернуться

14🥰2👏1

6 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC476 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Как и просили - держите вторую часть ОЦЕНКУ ЖИМОВ ПОДПИСЧИКОВ Если хотите еще - ❤️ Скидывайте планы тренировок, технику приседа жима, тяги - все чекну

❤‍🔥136

5 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC578 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

210кг 3х1, делал с остановкой. Но хочется еще дольше потом паузу держать, прям буду стараться Выводы делайте дальше) За 220 с остановкой нужно побороться, это прям то, что мне нужно для помоста. Пока что меня радует все! Вес стабильно 123-124, толком даже не ем, так, на салатиках сижу и кока колу зиро За жим лайк ставьте, хули, постарался - ❤️

293🥰3💋1

5 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC613 views79 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Жим 210 rpe 7 с паузой го? - ❤️ Главное не перепутать, и случайно не пожать 220...

66❤‍🔥6👍4💘2💋1

4 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC668 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlKd9YGwi9Q&feature=youtu.be Держите и поддержите пожалуйста, чет проснулся, с мотивацией видео записать - решил - сделал ❤️❤️

🔥132

4 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC627 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Хотите видео на ютуб? в часов 13? Буду философствовать на 20 минут на тему целеустремленности

  1. ебашь71%
  2. ждем41%
  3. свой ответ8%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC664 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

✔️310кг х 2 🔥День не однозначный, вчера заметил прям как фокус был потерян и отвлекался на всякие мелочи, в прочем был раздраженным. ❓Ожидания от тренировки целый день - дали о себе знать, в моменте просто устал и попросту ничего не хотелось делать Еще когда ехал в спортзал - была адская жара, в самом спортзале еще хуже, было невероятно плохо. Было 32 градуса, для меня было - вызовом, это лишь чуть чуть размазыв

14❤‍🔥2🥰2

3 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC643 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📌ОФП для пауэрлифтера: лишняя нагрузка или фундамент прогресса? 🔥Иногда можно услышать, что профессиональному лифтеру не нужна ОФП: достаточно приседать, жать и тянуть. Но на практике сильнейшие атлеты не ограничиваются только соревновательной тройкой. В их программах есть тяги, жимы гантелей, упражнения на спину, ноги, плечевой пояс, корпус и общую работоспособность. ⚡️И это не «бодибилдерский мусор», а инструмен

9🥰1

2 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC648 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⚡️Делюсь подготовкой одного из своих атлетов. Ярослав - работаем на жестком грифе 290кг 2х2, лучший результат на помосте около 315кг В НАТУРАШКУ! ✏️Сейчас наша задача получить Мастера Спорта в ФПР, а также попытаться установить рекорд России. Цели грандиозные, но получить Мастера реально - уже собираем, но рекорд России - мы должны это сделать, будем стараться любой ценой. Как видите - даже на таких весах есть ош

10💊1💋1

1 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC686 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVbiwdPjnSU Хороший стрим, мне понравился, держите перезалив с МАКСИМАЛИСТОМ

12

1 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC783 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

220кг 3х3 Очень легко, даже сказать нечего, 300кг дальше ждёт меня Будет очень интересно на следующей неделе. Чутка ромбовидная побаливает, спортивный массаж, думаю, исправит

15

31 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC862 views34 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

❓РАЗБОР ТЕХНИКИ ЖИМА ПОДПИСЧИКА 🔼В этой рубрике я решил сделать именно видео, стараться делать акцент на грамотном живом объяснении, не просто написать текстом "плохо замостился". А старался объяснять каждую мелочь Были как и хорошие жимы, были как и техники, которые нужны в корректировке. ➕Я лишь стараюсь дать объяснения, и советы парням - которые сами попросили этого же. 😘Мне лично нравится данная рубрика, есл

31🔥2🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @wandam11ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTCAnonymous Poll107 voters

Хотите видео на ютуб? в часов 13? Буду философствовать на 20 минут на тему целеустремленности

  1. ебашь71%
  2. ждем41%
  3. свой ответ8%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jul 2026, 19:55 UTCAnonymous Poll155 voters

РАЗБОР ЖИМА ПОДПИСЧИКОВ, ждете? видео на 10 минут записал

  1. летс гоу, нужен хейт91%
  2. может не надо?10%
  3. свой ответ6%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 548,900 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Калибр 3.5” (@wandam11ch), 1,781 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wandam11ch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.