Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Закрыт 𝑊𝐴𝐿𝑇𝑍 𝑂𝐹 𝐵𝐿𝑂𝑂𝐷 𝐿𝐼𝐹𝐸📢

Channel

Закрыт 𝑊𝐴𝐿𝑇𝑍 𝑂𝐹 𝐵𝐿𝑂𝑂𝐷 𝐿𝐼𝐹𝐸📢

@waltz_life

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003403665194
TypeChannel
Username@waltz_life
DescriptionИнфо: Waltz_blood Владелец: @ Совладелец: @
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 6 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/waltz_life

Growth

212 August 2026 — 2 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2 subscribers12 August 202614 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:162no change
12 Aug 2026, 14:472first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Videos
31
Links
30

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 42s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
225.0%
225.0%
🕊225.0%
🐳112.5%
💘112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 23 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jan 2026, 14:37 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Флуд 𝑊𝐴𝐿𝑇𝑍 𝑂𝐹 𝐵𝐿𝑂𝑂𝐷 𝐿𝐼𝐹𝐸📢 закрывается, спасибо всем за то ,что были с нами . Со всеми союзниками разрыв #важно_𝑾𝑶𝑩 #Репост_𝑾𝑶𝑩

🕊1

23 Jan 2026, 14:36 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «Закрыт 𝑊𝐴𝐿𝑇𝑍 𝑂𝐹 𝐵𝐿𝑂𝑂𝐷 𝐿𝐼𝐹𝐸📢»

15 Jan 2026, 14:38 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «Заморозка 𝑊𝐴𝐿𝑇𝑍 𝑂𝐹 𝐵𝐿𝑂𝑂𝐷 𝐿𝐼𝐹𝐸📢»

15 Jan 2026, 14:38 UTCviews —

Закрыт 𝑊𝐴𝐿𝑇𝑍 𝑂𝐹 𝐵𝐿𝑂𝑂𝐷 𝐿𝐼𝐹𝐸📢 pinned «Ризли сообщает🧷 ⏜ ─ · ─ ⪩ 📢 ⪨ ─ · ─ ⏜ Наш флуд уходит в заморозку до 25 числа . Репостов не будет и прочей активности,скоро вернёмся с новыми силами! #Репост_𝑾𝑶𝑩 #важно_𝑾𝑶𝑩»

15 Jan 2026, 14:38 UTC39 viewsread 14 August 2026

Ризли сообщает🧷 ⏜ ─ · ─ ⪩ 📢 ⪨ ─ · ─ ⏜ Наш флуд уходит в заморозку до 25 числа . Репостов не будет и прочей активности,скоро вернёмся с новыми силами! #Репост_𝑾𝑶𝑩 #важно_𝑾𝑶𝑩

13 Jan 2026, 05:30 UTC19 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @pearldew_lifeVideo

╭┄ ୨୧ ─┄ 🤩𝑒𝑤 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜 ┄─ ୨୧┄╮ ✨ 𝑎𝑢𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑟: bina ✨ 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎: тренд tgs: #видео𝑃𝐷𝑒𝑤 #репост𝑃𝐷𝑒𝑤

11 Jan 2026, 10:40 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @pearldew_lifeVideo

╭┄ ୨୧ ─┄ 🤩𝑒𝑤 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜 ┄─ ୨୧┄╮ ✨ 𝑎𝑢𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑟: bina ✨ 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎: тренд bina:: мне не очень нравится как получилось, нуладно 😔 tgs: #видео𝑃𝐷𝑒𝑤 #репост𝑃𝐷𝑒𝑤

💘1

10 Jan 2026, 09:54 UTC16 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @pearldew_lifeVideo

╭┄ ୨୧ ─┄ 🤩𝑒𝑤 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜 ┄─ ୨୧┄╮ ✨ 𝑎𝑢𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑟: bina ✨ 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎: наша (?) #видео𝑃𝐷𝑒𝑤 #репост𝑃𝐷𝑒𝑤

10 Jan 2026, 07:55 UTC18 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🌟𝗖𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢N•🌟• ⏜ ─ · ─ ⪩ 🌟 ⪨ ─ · ─ ⏜ Ме And ᭥ ᛝ ܵ 𝐕ꪮ𝐈𝐄 𝓛𝐀ᝯ𝐓𝐄́𝐄 . ͡꒱ Видео уже в тик ток @vlfloodx and @waltz_flood ⏜ ─ · ─ ⪩ 🌟 ⪨ ─ · ─ ⏜ #видео_𝑾𝑶𝑩 #коллаб_𝑾𝑶𝑩

11🕊1

7 Jan 2026, 12:34 UTC41 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Ризли сообщает 🧷 ⏜ ─ · ─ ⪩ 🤩 ⪨ ─ · ─ ⏜ следящий ризли уходит в рест на неделю ,тоесть до 14 января. Репостов не будет . Прошу прощения. #важно_𝑾𝑶𝑩 #репост_𝑾𝑶𝑩

11🐳1

7 Jan 2026, 09:59 UTC19 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @pearldew_lifePhoto

bina:: набор снова открыт!! ознакомится с инфо по поводу вступления: @smellatt tgs: #репост𝑃𝐷𝑒𝑤

6 Jan 2026, 13:28 UTC23 viewsread 14 August 2026

★Ризли сообщает [🧷] ⏜ ─ · ─ ⪩ 🤩 ⪨ ─ · ─ ⏜ Репост тайм 📢 —конец — начало ¿?

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @waltz_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,242,010 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Закрыт 𝑊𝐴𝐿𝑇𝑍 𝑂𝐹 𝐵𝐿𝑂𝑂𝐷 𝐿𝐼𝐹𝐸📢” (@waltz_life), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waltz_life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.