9 measurements spanning 23 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,265–2,306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 05:44
2,301
+22
27 Aug 2026, 10:43
2,279
-1
24 Aug 2026, 11:05
2,280
-7
20 Aug 2026, 23:16
2,287
-10
17 Aug 2026, 12:48
2,297
+16
14 Aug 2026, 14:13
2,281
+11
11 Aug 2026, 01:14
2,270
-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:01
2,271
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:47
2,271
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 2,301 subscribers
Avg views / post
252
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
5,035
Reactions total
135
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
135 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
68
50.4%
❤
61
45.2%
👏
5
3.70%
😭
1
0.741%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☄️ 알려 드립니다..
아시는 것처럼 '7월 시가베팅 참여방'에서 시가베팅 진행하고 있습니다..장에 크게 상관 없이 최소한의 수익 그 이상을 내드리려 하고 있습니다.
📌 아시는대로 당일단타 개념으로 매일 아침 장 시작전 차원이 다른 확률높은 시가베팅종목 3종목씩 무료로 공유해 드립니다.
(수백만원 가치 이상의 유료방을 무료로 구독자 여러분께 오픈)
하오니 어나더 레벨의 무료 텔레그램방 '6월 시가베팅 참여방'에 참여하길 원하시는 분은 아래 1, 2단계 모두 실행해 주시면 순서대로 입장승인해 드리겠습니다.
1번 단계: 아래 링크 클릭후 입장요청(Join Channel) 누름
2번 단계: 문자로( 010-2156-3046) 본인 텔레그램 닉네임 남김
링크 : https://t.me/+LeyKzcMM3cQ4NmM1
감사합니다.
오늘 아침 '시가베팅방'에 나간 시가베팅주 3개 당일 성적입니다..
08/07(금) 시가베팅주
이스트에이드 시가대비 16% 상승(장중 상한가)
SK디앤디 시가대비 6% 상승
매드업 시가대비 강보합
오늘 나간 시가베팅주는 평소 클래스에 조금 못 미치지만 단타로 나쁘지 않은 저희 기준 평타 수준이었습니다..
아무래도 장의 영향을 전혀 안 받을 수는 없지만 조금 더 정비해서 다음주는 평소의 비교 불가 클래스로 돌아오도록 하겠습니다..
저희 시가베탕주 3개 잘 활용하시면 여러분 계좌수익 증가에 반드시 도움이 되실겁니다.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wallstpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“월가프로” (@wallstpro), 2,301 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wallstpro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.