Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 92 days, net -244. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,122–9,017 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 01:46
8,670
+28
4 Nov 2026, 23:15
8,642
+85
2 Nov 2026, 01:07
8,557
+77
29 Oct 2026, 20:01
8,480
+90
26 Oct 2026, 09:06
8,390
-22
23 Oct 2026, 00:57
8,412
+68
20 Oct 2026, 02:30
8,344
+119
17 Oct 2026, 02:18
8,225
-33
13 Oct 2026, 15:41
8,258
-58
7 Oct 2026, 17:41
8,316
-65
30 Sept 2026, 23:22
8,381
-268
16 Sept 2026, 08:21
8,649
+88
12 Sept 2026, 11:39
8,561
+64
8 Sept 2026, 15:41
8,497
+137
3 Sept 2026, 00:27
8,360
-52
30 Aug 2026, 14:03
8,412
-49
27 Aug 2026, 12:24
8,461
-52
24 Aug 2026, 02:53
8,513
-92
20 Aug 2026, 14:42
8,605
-58
17 Aug 2026, 19:06
8,663
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.52%
avg views ÷ 8,670 subscribers
Avg views / post
132
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
54 (7 June 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
2,776
Reactions total
33
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 12:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,200
Videos
≈47
Links
≈738
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 34s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
675 reactions across 39 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
584
86.5%
🎉
19
2.81%
🙏
16
2.37%
🔥
13
1.93%
😘
8
1.19%
🏆
6
0.889%
🥰
6
0.889%
💔
5
0.741%
😴
5
0.741%
💯
4
0.593%
❤🔥
3
0.444%
😱
3
0.444%
🤩
3
0.444%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 675 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🧠 100 تمرين ما يعنيش بالضرورة أنك مستعد للباك!
صاحبة المرتبة الثالثة وطنياً والأولى في شعبة العلوم التجريبية في بكالوريا 2026 بمعدل 19.16 تكشف عن سر مهم في طريقة تحضيرها للامتحان:
❌ ما كانتش تحسب عدد التمارين اللي تحلّهم! ✅ كانت تركّز على عدد الأفكار اللي تتعلمها وتفهمها.
لأنك ممكن تحل 100 تمرين وتلقى روحك ما زلت ما شفتش أفكار جديدة! 👀
🎯 العبرة ماشي شحال من تمرين حلّيت، بل شحال من فكرة فهمت وتعلمت تتعامل معاها.
🎥 شاه…
عزيزي الطالب 👨🏻🎓
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
كل المصادر الخاصة بالبكالوريا هنا لك ⬇️
https://t.me/addlist/jfYOJFeeT1E4M2Jk
اعلم انك ستصل I trust you good night 🌉 💙
🔥 3 عادات تصنع الفرق بين تلميذ عادي وتلميذ من الأوائل في الباك!
كيفاش قدرت صاحبة المرتبة الثالثة وطنياً والأولى وطنياً في شعبة العلوم التجريبية تحقق معدل 19.16 في بكالوريا 2026؟ 🏆
في حلقتنا الجديدة، كشفتلنا عن 3 عادات كانت جزءاً من سر تفوقها…
👀 العادة الأولى يعرفوها بزاف، والثانية يغفل عليها الكثير، أما الثالثة؟ فهي من أكثر الأخطاء اللي يقع فيها تلاميذ الباك!
والأجمل أنها نصائح من تجربة حقيقية، ماشي مجرد كلام نظر…
عزيزي الطالب 👨🏻🎓
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
كل المصادر الخاصة بالبكالوريا هنا لك ⬇️
https://t.me/addlist/jfYOJFeeT1E4M2Jk
اعلم انك ستصل I trust you good night 🌉 💙
✨ كانت متوقعة 17 في الباك… جابت 19,16 والثالثة وطنيا 😳 | بكالوريا 2026
الحلقة الكاملة تجدونها على قناتي في اليوتيوب و الله مليئة بالنصائح و تخليك متحقرش نفسك و توصل وين حاب 👇🏻
https://youtu.be/5tecI0hklQc?si=UgZOK7_aoe0b8puf
كانت متوقعة 17 ولا 18… وجابت 19,16 😳
سعال دعاء زينب، المرتبة 3 وطنيا والأولى في شعبة علوم تجريبية، تحكيلك كلش:
▫️ علاش ما كانتش تحسب شحال من تمرين حلّت
▫️ رايها في الليالي البيضاء
▫️ 3 عادات صنعت الفرق
▫️ الذكاء ولا الانضباط؟
▫️ واش تقول للي عندو شك في روحو
👇 الحلقة كاملة:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tecI0hklQc
🚨 نكملو كل دروس التاريخ والجغرافيا في 5 دقايق؟! 😳🔥
🎯 اليوم مع الدكتور وليد نراجعو أهم أفكار زوج محاور في كاروسيل واحد!
🌍 التاريخ:
✅ أهم الأزمات الدولية من برلين حتى كوبا.
✅ علاش أزمة كوبا قرّبت العالم من حرب نووية؟
✅ أسباب التعايش السلمي ومظاهر الانفراج الدولي.
✅ مؤتمر باندونغ وحركة عدم الانحياز.
✅ مصطلحات وشخصيات لازم تعرفهم.
🗺 الجغرافيا:
✅ كيفاش تفرّق بين التقدم والتخلف؟
✅ عوامل تقدم الدول وأسباب تخلفها.
✅ الحلول …
⚡️ ٦ — السؤال: نجرب نفس كتلة Al ونفس كمية H₃O⁺ مرتين، لكن نضيف ماءً للمحلول في الثانية. التحول تام، والحرارة وسطح التلامس ثابتان. نقيس الغاز بنفس شروط الحرارة والضغط. نتوقع:
أ) حجمًا نهائيًا أصغر بسبب التمديد42%
ب) بداية أبطأ ونفس حجم الغاز النهائي21%
ج) بداية أسرع ونفس حجم الغاز النهائي32%
د) بداية أبطأ وحجمًا نهائيًا أكبر5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡️ ١٠ — السؤال: 2Al+6H₃O⁺→2Al³⁺+3H₂+6H₂O.
الأولى: Al مسحوق كميته 0.010 mol.
الثانية: Al قطعة كميتها 0.020 mol. في كل تجربة 0.006 mol من H₃O⁺، والتحول تام. بنفس شروط قياس الغاز:
أ) الثانية تعطي ضعف حجم H₂ النهائي26%
ب) نفس حجم H₂ النهائي في التجربتين35%
ج) الأولى تعطي ضعف حجم H₂ النهائي9%
د) كتلة Al وحدها لا تسمح بأي استنتاج30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡️ ٧ — السؤال:
2Al+6H₃O⁺→2Al³⁺+3H₂+6H₂O.
مع 0.010 mol من Al، نعوّض 100 mL من حمض 0.060 mol/L بـ200 mL بنفس التركيز. التحول تام وV_M=24 L/mol. حجم H₂ النهائي الجديد؟
أ) 72 mL9%
ب) 120 mL18%
ج) 240 mL36%
د) 144 mL36%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @walidacademy24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⚡️ ١٠ — السؤال: 2Al+6H₃O⁺→2Al³⁺+3H₂+6H₂O.
الأولى: Al مسحوق كميته 0.010 mol.
الثانية: Al قطعة كميتها 0.020 mol. في كل تجربة 0.006 mol من H₃O⁺، والتحول تام. بنفس شروط قياس الغاز:
أ) الثانية تعطي ضعف حجم H₂ النهائي26%
ب) نفس حجم H₂ النهائي في التجربتين35%
ج) الأولى تعطي ضعف حجم H₂ النهائي9%
د) كتلة Al وحدها لا تسمح بأي استنتاج30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡️ ٦ — السؤال: نجرب نفس كتلة Al ونفس كمية H₃O⁺ مرتين، لكن نضيف ماءً للمحلول في الثانية. التحول تام، والحرارة وسطح التلامس ثابتان. نقيس الغاز بنفس شروط الحرارة والضغط. نتوقع:
أ) حجمًا نهائيًا أصغر بسبب التمديد42%
ب) بداية أبطأ ونفس حجم الغاز النهائي21%
ج) بداية أسرع ونفس حجم الغاز النهائي32%
د) بداية أبطأ وحجمًا نهائيًا أكبر5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡️ ٧ — السؤال:
2Al+6H₃O⁺→2Al³⁺+3H₂+6H₂O.
مع 0.010 mol من Al، نعوّض 100 mL من حمض 0.060 mol/L بـ200 mL بنفس التركيز. التحول تام وV_M=24 L/mol. حجم H₂ النهائي الجديد؟
أ) 72 mL9%
ب) 120 mL18%
ج) 240 mL36%
د) 144 mL36%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡️ ٨ — السؤال:
تجربتان تامتان تعطيان نفس كمية الغاز النهائية، بحيز غازي ثابت الحجم. الأولى عند 300 K والثانية عند 330 K، وΔP ناتجة عن الغاز المتشكل فقط. ما ΔP_f,2/ΔP_f,1؟
أ) 1.1035%
ب) 1.0024%
ج) 0.91 تقريبًا29%
د) 1.2112%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡️ ٩ — السؤال:
نفس المتفاعلات والكميات والشروط، أضفنا وسيطًا فقط في التجربة الثانية. التحول تام والغاز غائب ابتدائيًا. أي زوج نتائج يوافق أثر الوسيط وحده؟ الحجم مقاس بنفس الشروط.
أ) t₁/₂ أكبر وV_f نفسه24%
ب) t₁/₂ أصغر وV_f أكبر18%
ج) t₁/₂ أصغر وV_f نفسه41%
د) t₁/₂ نفسه وV_f أصغر18%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡️ ١ — السؤال: 2Al+6H₃O⁺→2Al³⁺+3H₂+6H₂O.
H₂ غائب ابتدائيًا.
حجمه المتشكل 24 mL وV_M=24 L/mol. ما التقدم؟
أ) 1×10⁻³ mol42%
ب) 3×10⁻³ mol33%
ج) ⅓×10⁻³ mol14%
د) ⅔×10⁻³ mol11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MASSAR MED” (@walidacademy24), 8,670 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/walidacademy24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.