Dreadnought incluido de último momento a ser retirado en los pastizales de warhammer legends
😭10

Channel
@w40k_prieto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
9,599subscribers
+30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001251488633 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @w40k_prieto |
| Description | Podcast dedicado al lore, artwork, noticias y mucho más sobre el universo ficticio de Warhammer 40k y Fantasy Todos nuestros links, redes sociales y Patreon: https://linktr.ee/WPP40K |
| Created | 11 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/w40k_prieto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 9,599 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 9,602 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 9,604 | +8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 9,596 | +19 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 9,577 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 9,569 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 9,569 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (29 July 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 46,548 |
| Reactions total | 622 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
622 reactions across 27 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 323 | 51.9% | |
| 😭 | 76 | 12.2% | |
| 😁 | 57 | 9.16% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 6.27% | |
| 🤣 | 34 | 5.47% | |
| 😱 | 31 | 4.98% | |
| 🤯 | 26 | 4.18% | |
| 🦄 | 10 | 1.61% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 1.45% | |
| 🤨 | 6 | 0.965% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.322% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.322% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.322% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.161% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 622reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dreadnought incluido de último momento a ser retirado en los pastizales de warhammer legends
😭10
Una liga mexicana de Warhammer va abrir lugares! Toda la info aqui: https://www.facebook.com/share/1DcG2XxyUh/
❤15
Ora sacando titulos y todo
🤣17
Hoy perdimos a la piedra fundamental de la franquicia 😢. Press F to pay respects 🫡
😭27😁1😢1
Signed Kill’em All
Photo, posted without a caption
😭18🔥4
Signed Fascio
Photo, posted without a caption
❤19👏4
Justo acabamos de grabar un episodio de noticias y acaba de leaker el codex https://youtu.be/3Njj0hd2JF0
🤣14❤1
💃Y chillele mi perro😠
❤43
Del buen Abraham Yarrick, Trazyn se estaba refiriendo a estos, la guardia pretoriana septima y no al pretoriano mayor , por si tenian esperanza todavia, pero Rogal esta bien muerto
❤20😱8
Cada vez mas cerca de la revolucion Grot
🔥7
🎁Spoilers pequeños de The Wicked and the Warped que tal vez revelan algo de un primarca perdido Al tratar de escapar del estomago de una bestia, Trazyn busca en sus archivos algo lo suficientemente grande para hacer explotar a la bestia por dentro, en una mencion dice "Pretoriano Septimo" , Rogal Dorn era conocido como el Pretoriano de Terra y el primarca septimo......Sera que esta en estasis en el gran Solemnace?
❤23
Yo estornudando en el asilo
😁30❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @w40k_prieto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Warhammer para prietos - WPP” (@w40k_prieto), 9,599 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/w40k_prieto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.