5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,743–8,779 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 05:34
8,747
-16
9 Aug 2026, 23:31
8,763
-11
6 Aug 2026, 19:30
8,774
-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:17
8,775
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:44
8,775
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 15 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
617 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
390
63.2%
❤
155
25.1%
👏
36
5.83%
👾
31
5.02%
👀
3
0.486%
🎉
2
0.324%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 22 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дорогие друзья и жучки!
Сегодня мы обращаемся ко всем тем, кто поддерживал нас регулярно и продолжает делать это по сей день, благодаря кому мы смогли помочь сотням политически преследуемых россиян.
Мы, как вы уже знаете, закрываем направление прямой помощи. Это не эмоциональный шаг и не отказ от наших ценностей, а попытка действовать ответственно и не обещать того, что мы не сможем выполнить в том же объеме и форм…
«Вывожук» — это в первую очередь люди
Люди, которым мы помогали, люди, которые сталкивались с огромным системным злом. Люди, которые помогали инициативе держаться на плаву: репостами, пожертвованиями, плечом. А еще люди, которые делали проект — те, кто его начинал, те, кто формировал самую большую и яркую команду в нашей истории, те, кто дошел с командой до сегодняшнего дня. Мы. И сегодня мы хотим сказать немного ли…
🪲 Какие ресурсы позволили нам помогать
В этих карточках делимся финансовым отчетом за минувшие годы: сколько стоили эвакуации и как нас поддерживали фонды, частные жертвователи и вы — те, кто участвовал в наших сборах.
Теперь, когда мы закрыли прямую помощь преследуемым, мы просим вас перенаправить освободившиеся ресурсы на другие правозащитные проекты.
Поддержать | Горячая линия | Наш сайт | О нас | Патреон | Инс…
Когда мы принимали решение о закрытии прямой помощи, мы прекрасно понимали, что запрос на эту помощь не иссякнет — людей в России будут продолжать преследовать, и этим людям в разной степени экстренно будет приходиться уезжать.
Для тех, кому это может понадобиться — преследуемых активисто:к и помогающих инициатив — мы собрали основные рекомендации, основанные на нашем опыте. Подробный гайд на Notion ищите по ссылке:…
❤🔥105❤46👾8🎉2👀1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @vyvozhuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 334,744 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Идите лесом! @iditelesom_help · 151,086 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вывожук: клуб путешественников” (@vyvozhuk), 8,747 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vyvozhuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
