Channel
@vyniqlab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,212subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 12 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003556827721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vyniqlab |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vyniqlab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 1,212 | -8 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 1,220 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 July 2026 – 9 October 2026) |
| Views total | 392 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
202 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 83 | 41.1% | |
| ❤ | 59 | 29.2% | |
| 👍 | 57 | 28.2% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 VYNIQ ECOSYSTEM UPDATE — A NEW CHAPTER BEGINS The journey of Vyniq continues, and we're preparing for the next stage of our ecosystem's growth. 🌐 At Vyniq, our vision goes beyond building a single product. We're working toward a connected technology ecosystem focused on blockchain infrastructure, social experiences, digital identity, and Web3 utilities. 🔹 Building the Vyniq Ecosystem Our focus is on improving our e…
🔥7
🚀 Vyniq Official Update We’re excited to announce that we’re launching our new official Vyniq username & verified page. From now on, you’ll be able to find and follow our official updates through our verified presence. 👉 Follow our new X official account: https://x.com/vyniqxyz We’ll be sharing important updates, product development, ecosystem news, upcoming integrations, and more there. A lot is currently being bu…
🔥4❤1
Vyniq Mining App — Official Launch A few days ago, we shared that the launch of our Mining App was getting very close. Today, we’re excited to officially announce that Vyniq Mining App is launching today. 🎉 From today, everyone will be able to access and use the Mining App. 🌐 Official Mining App: app.vyniq.xyz But that’s not the only important update. We’re also actively working on the next major part of the Vyniq…
👍4🔥3❤2
Vyniq Mining — A New Update We’re excited to share a quick update with the Vyniq community. Vyniq Mining is getting very close to launch. ⛏️ Our team has been working behind the scenes to prepare the mining system, improve the user experience, test the infrastructure, and make sure everything is ready before launch. This is another important step toward building the broader Vyniq ecosystem, and we’re looking forward…
🔥7
Vyniq is starting a new chapter on X! We’ve created a new official Vyniq X account as we prepare to expand our global community and strengthen our presence across Web3. From now on, we’ll be sharing Vyniq updates, development progress, ecosystem updates, partnerships, community activities and more through our new X account. 🐦 Follow our new X account: https://x.com/vyniqxyz Please follow, like, repost and support the…
👍6
Dear Vyniq Community, We want to share an important update with everyone regarding our official social media presence and ongoing development. Recently, our official Vyniq X (Twitter) account has been suspended. At this moment, we have not received a clear explanation of the exact reason for the suspension. We want to make it clear that we are actively working on an appeal and recovery process with X. Our team is cur…
🔥3
We’re not gone. We’re not finished. We’re just preparing for what comes next. 🔥 Vyniq wasn’t built to lose — Vyniq was built to win. Every setback is part of the journey, and we’re using this time to come back stronger, smarter, and more ready than before. The silence doesn’t mean we stopped. Something big is coming. The Vyniq comeback is coming soon. 🚀⚡️ Stay with us. The next chapter is about to begin.
👍3🔥3💯1
A New Look for Vyniq We’re excited to introduce the new Vyniq logo — a fresh identity that better represents the vision we’re building. Vyniq is moving forward with a focus on building a developer-first Web3 ecosystem, combining blockchain infrastructure with social and community-driven experiences. This is more than just a logo change — it’s a small step toward a bigger vision. 🟣 Thank you to everyone supporting us …
❤3👍3🔥3
Channel photo updated
🚀 Vyniq Community Update Hey everyone! 🌍 We’re preparing a small community reward campaign to encourage genuine support and activity around Vyniq. The idea is simple: 🔹 Repost selected Vyniq posts 🔹 Submit the repost link through our upcoming web app 🔹 Our team manually verifies the submission 🔹 Verified participants receive POL rewards We’re planning to start with a 100 POL initial reward pool as a small pilot. We’l…
🔥28👍17❤16
Channel name was changed to «VyniqChain»
🚀 Vyniq Gram is coming back — faster, smarter, and more optimized than ever. We’re excited to announce that we’re working on the relaunch of Vyniq Gram, our flagship social platform. This time, we’re rebuilding the foundation with a modern, scalable architecture designed to deliver a smoother and more reliable experience. ⚡️ Serverless infrastructure 🌐 Cloud-native backend 🔐 Modern authentication 🗄 Scalable data & me…
❤20👍20🔥19💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vyniqlab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VyniqChain” (@vyniqlab), 1,212 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vyniqlab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.