Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Карьера с Лапиной

@vyborcomment

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,477subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001724740627
TypeChannel
Username@vyborcomment
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vyborcomment

Growth

1,4731,4771,4757 August 2026 — 1,473 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,473 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,474 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,477 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,472–1,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 09:241,477+3
8 Aug 2026, 14:011,474+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:481,473no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:191,473first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.0%
avg views ÷ 1,477 subscribers
Avg views / post
370
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (2 July 202629 July 2026)
Views total4,809
Reactions total149
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

220 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15168.6%
👍4018.2%
🔥2611.8%
💯31.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTC316 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У меня нет контактов. — Наталья, у меня нет контактов, нетворк не для меня. Вчера на группе обучения карьерных наставников исследовали тему работы с сопротивлением клиентов в выходе в нетворк, и одно из самых частых возражений — «у меня нет контактов». Что же скрывается за идеей, что у вас нет контактов? Я не знаю кого-то конкретного, того, кто возьмёт меня к себе. У меня нет конкретных контактов в конкретных ком

12👍3🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC299 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @senatorovlabFile

Статья о том, как проходить собеседования. Самые частые вопросы от HR, ошибки в ответах, фреймы и правильные стратегии. Все это в одном файле - приятного и полезного чтения!

11🔥5

27 Jul 2026, 06:42 UTC353 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Возможности с нулевой ставкой Вчера была на встрече у Артёма Сенаторова — это человек, который вдохновил меня наконец заняться развитием Instagram, а сейчас у него вышла новая книга по фреймам. Некоторый материал из неё планирую взять в мастер-класс по манипуляциям. Артём много говорил про возможности, про то, как мы их замечаем или пропускаем. Поворотная точка в его карьере произошла когда он оказался ди-джеем на

11👍3🔥3

24 Jul 2026, 06:27 UTC396 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❤️ Пятничный пост про ресурс по ссылке https://telegra.ph/Resurs-i-chernye-dyry-07-24

👍7🔥75

22 Jul 2026, 07:25 UTC419 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Позитивное мышление как ключевая компетенция - Меня не взяли.. - «я никому не нужен, я больше никогда не найду работу, умру под мостом» - Меня не взяли - «наверное мне туда и не надо было, странно себя руководитель вела на интервью, поищу ещё» Позитивное мышление. Позитивное мышление это не оголтелый оптимизм. Это способность взрослого человека всё воспринимать как опыт и видеть обстоятельства, а не приговор. Фокус

13🔥4👍3

21 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC434 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хантинг наоборот Я очень часто слышу: "Раньше меня хантили, Наталья, а сейчас нет, не понимаю что изменилось?" Вы не один, давайте разбираться кто виноват и то делать. Рынок сейчас осторожный Руководители часто сами не знают надо ли искать и нанимать людей. Поэтому вакансий открывают мало. Но знаете что? Вакансии может не быть, зато задачи в бизнесе есть всегда. Даже в том, который схлопывается. Рекрутеры и руководи

9👍6

20 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC365 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вы правда хотите достигать целей компании? Пишу работу по философии на этот раз про экономику и исследую интересные механизмы управления, которыми с вами хочу поделиться. Когда компания делится с вами информацией про стратегию, направление бизнеса, вы знаете как устроены KPI и даже понимаете почему цифры именно такие — это делает вас гораздо более включённым в достижение целей. Этот механизм исследовали Дардо и Лавал

👍65🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC391 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рынок выглядит очень странно Безработица по-прежнему на минимальном уровне. Индекс hh 9.1 говорит о том, что резюме намного больше чем вакансий. Квалифицированных кадров по-прежнему не хватает. Работу найти сложно — через hh почти невозможно, наём идёт по личным связям. Вот здесь на HABR статья от HR аналитика: https://habr.com/ru/articles/1058162/ Вот здесь в Коммерсант паника тревога правительства и попытка все

10👍3

16 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC435 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уверенность решает - Наталья, открылась вакансия в соседнем подразделении и мне очень интересно, но мне кажется я пока не готова... 90% возможностей мы даже не пробуем взять. Не то, что у нас не получается, а мы просто даём им спокойно проходить мимо. - Я не готов(а) - Мне пока недостаточно опыта - Я не справлюсь - Сейчас не время - Есть те, у кого больше опыта, куда мне... Когда мы уверены, мы видим возможнос

4

15 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC339 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

в продолжение утреннего поста

4

15 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC383 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Крутой пост в Linkedin про взгляд топа на попытки повзаимодействовать с ним. Ссылка на пост Текст в первом комментарии

3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vyborcomment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Карьера с Лапиной” (@vyborcomment), 1,477 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vyborcomment.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.