Channel
@vvvsvv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,667subscribers
+325 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001011299832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vvvsvv |
| Created | 27 January 2016 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vvvsvv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 1,667 | +251 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 1,416 | +74 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 1,342 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 January 2016 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (27 January 2016 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,597 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vvvsvv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 January 2016 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
من حُسن حظ البشرية أن "الحب" لا يُرى، فهو مجرد إحساس، لا تعرف له لونًا ولا شكلًا ولا هيئةً، لا يمكنك أن تقيس طوله أو حجمه أو كتلته أو كثافته، ينتقل بين البشر دون الحاجة إلى سيارة توصله أو كهرباء تشحنه، ليس له أرقامٌ سرّيةٌ تفتحه، ولا أبوابٌ تغلقه، ولا نوافذُ يخترقها، فهو لا يحتاج إلى شيءٍ سوى قلبٍ صافٍ يستقبله🤍.
لستُ مُكتئبًا، أنا فقط مُتعب من المُجاملات، الاختلاط، الضحكات التي أُطلقها بدلًا من الشتائم. أنا مُتعب من الحوارات التي أخوضها ولا تهمّني.
في يوم الأربعين، تتجدد معاني الوفاء، وتشرق في القلوب أنوار الحسين (عليه السلام). إنها مناسبةٌ تُحيي القيم التي استُشهد من أجلها: الحق، والعدل، والكرامة، والصبر. الأربعين ليست مناسبةً للحزن فقط، بل هي لحظةٌ يراجع فيها الإنسان نفسه: ماذا بقي من الصدق؟ وماذا بقي من الوفاء؟ وهل ما زال في القلب متسعٌ للحق؟ سلامٌ على الحسين يوم ارتقى شهيدًا؛ رحل الجسد، وبقي النور، وسيبقى اسمه خالدًا، وبقيت رسالته حياةً في قلوب المؤمنين.
لن يتم اختيارك لإنهم يفضلون السَهِل دائمًا، لن يتم اختيارك لأنكَ مُعقد، لا يُجذبهَم إختلافك، لا تُوجد الكثير من الأشياء التي مُمكِن الوصول إليها لك، لا يريدون الذهاب، لا يريدون ان يتعبوا، وَ لا يريدون المحاولة، إنهُم خائفون مِن المُحاوله أساسًا، لن يتم اختيارك وليس خطأك هٓذا، لكِن ليس خطأك ان تُحب نفسك، ان تقرأ دون ان تشعُر بالوِحدة، قد يكون الاستمتاع مع نفسك، القيام بالاعمال المنزلية، سقي تلك النباتات، الاهتمام بقطت…
أنا يا صديقي لا أعرفُ الإيذاء، لستُ مثالي أبداً لكنني لم أُؤذي أحداً، لم أُؤذي سوى نفسي، بداخلي جزء سيء لكني لا أنقُض عهداً ولا أخون وعداً، ولا أستطيع أن أرى الكسر في عين أحد، وأعرف جيداً مرارة الخذلان والوحدة ولا أجيد الرحيل ولا التخلي وتلك يا صديقي مشكلة لا تستطيع أن تَفهمها .
أعرف أنني أتغير أصبحت هادئ أكثر من قبل أتجنب المناقشات وكلمات اللوم والعتاب أشعر بالملل من المحادثات الطويله لا أطيق التحدث في الهاتف لا أعبر عما أشعر به لأي شخص مهما كنت غاضب وحزين ومُحطم أصبحت أكثر عقلانية أفكر كثيراً قبل إتخاذ قرار واحد أنا الذي كنت لا أجيد التخلي تحولت .
أعرف جيدا لاأحد يتحملني حتى أصدقائي المقربين، تأتي بعض الاوقات اكون مصاباً بالجنون ابقه صامتاً لوقت طويل ولاأتحدث مع احد، يظنون بأني كنت نائماً لكن العكس تماماً أنني فائق لوقت طويل ولاأرغب بالتحدث ولأريد أن يراني احد بأني مُكتئب او حزين سوف يضغط عليه الآلم بالأسئله المكرره، مابك ؟ لماذا لاتتحدث ؟ كيف حالك ؟ لماذا انت حزين ؟ اخبرني فأنا صديقك المقرب ؟ من معك ؟ أرجوك فقط أتركني وأذهب أنا نفسي لاعرف الجواب وأنت تريد الج…
كنتُ أنسان مسالم جدا، كل شي يحدث بنيهَ صافيه للغايه، كنتُ اسامح الجميع حتى اعدائي اللذين اكرههم كثيرا، لم اعرف شيء عنهم وماذا يوجد بداخلهم عني، كنتُ أعاتب الجميع ومن يرحل اشعر بحزن شديد ابقى افكر كثيرا وعقلي ينفجرُ لماذا رحل وما السبب، بعد الصدمات الكثيره فجأه قد تحولت الى أنسان لم يعد بداخلي شيء، لقد عرفت أن هذه الحياة مجرد تضيع وقت لاأكثر، أصبحت اتجنب جميع العلاقات والصداقات لكي اركز على نفسي فقط عرفت أنني اظلمها و…
- Hi .
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @vvvsvv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 982,420 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ali Hussain ¦¦ علي حسين” (@vvvsvv), 1,667 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vvvsvv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.