Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Вухайба ོ

@vuhayba571

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,266subscribers

+155 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001811832109
TypeChannel
Username@vuhayba571
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vuhayba571

Growth

4,0834,2664,174.57 August 2026 — 4,111 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,111 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,083 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,258 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,266 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +155. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,056–4,293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:164,266+8
10 Aug 2026, 18:054,258+175
7 Aug 2026, 21:414,083-28
7 Aug 2026, 06:304,111no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:264,111first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.8%
avg views ÷ 4,266 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,720
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (15 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total54,433
Reactions total2,147
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,263 reactions across 21 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,263100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,263reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 21 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vuhayba571. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC100 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Deraza tokchasida gul turgan bo’lsa, bu ichkarida doim bahor degani emas… Yuzimiz kulib turgani bilan, ichimizda ba’zan bo’ronlar bo’ladi…

21

6 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC813 views99 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ey mening go‘zal Allohim! Oxirini bilmagan yo‘llarda, yelkamga og‘ir kelgan sinovlarda va shu ulkan dunyoda faqat Sengagina tavakkal qilaman. Ey Robbim… -nimaga sabr qilib kelayotgan bo‘lsak, barchasini biz uchun xayrlisi bilan nasib etgin.

99

5 Aug 2026, 02:53 UTC≈1,300 views112 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Shukr Senga, ey Robbim! Menga ato etgan behisob ne’matlaring uchun. Sen bergan barcha ne’matlarni sanab ham tugata olmayman. Meni shukr qiluvchilardan etgin — nafaqat berganlaring uchun, balki meni asrash uchun bermaganlaring uchun ham…

112

4 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC≈1,430 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Hech kim ideal emas… Lekin seni qanday bo‘lsang, shunday qabul qiladigan, g‘amxo‘rlik qiladigan, samimiy, qiyin paytda qo‘llab-quvvatlaydigan, senga ishonadigan, eshitishni biladigan, og‘ir paytlarda yo‘qolib qolmaydigan, muvaffaqiyatlaringga quvonadigan va manfaat uchun emas, hislar uchun yoningda qoladigan insonning- borligi sen uchun baxt… agar shunday insoningiz bo’lsa hech qachon qo’llarini qo’yib yubormang qal

62

3 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,710 views96 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Umrimning eng go’zal yoshida yashayapman, ammo qalbimda hali kelmagan ertangi kunning charchogi va og’rig’i bor…

96

2 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC≈2,240 views144 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Go’zal bir narsa haqida o’yla dedilar… -Men esa ota, onam va oilam bilan birga ramazonda birga iftorlik qilib, kulib o’tirgan kunlarimni o’yladim… Siz ham sog’indingizmi Ramazonni?

144

1 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC≈2,420 views110 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Allohga shu qadar yaqin bo’ling-ki, sizga yetishmoq uchun, Allohga yaqinlashishga majbur bo’lishsin… Bir jamiyl jumla bor edi… Alloh o’zi sevganiga, sevdirsin sizni…

110

31 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC≈2,820 views110 reactionsread 8 August 2026

-Shoshilma… Allohga ishon…. -hali sening bog’ing hammanikidan ko’proq gullaydi ikki ko’zi nurligim…☘️

110

30 Jul 2026, 05:21 UTC≈2,930 views107 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Duolarim sabab kelding, deya olmayman, chunki men bunchalar chiroyli duo qilolmasdim. Balki bu — taqdirning menga bergan eng go’zal javobidir, yuragim aytolmagan gaplarni osmon o‘zi eshitgandir. Sen kelganingda hammasi o‘zgardi ikki ko’zimning chechagi go‘yo, so‘zsiz tushunilgan hislar paydo bo‘ldi. -Men esa hanuz hayronman: qanday qilib bunchalar go‘zal mo‘jiza mening hayotimga kirdi…

107

29 Jul 2026, 04:14 UTC≈3,000 views121 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

So’rashdi: -Qaysi biri muhimroq: borar manzilmi yoki yo’lmi? Javob juda ham go’zal bo’ldi: -Yo’ldosh. Ajoyib jumla bor edi… -Yo’ldosh yaxshi bo’lsa, yo’lning ahamiyati yo’q, agar Alloh hohlasa so’nggi manzil Jannat bo’ladi…

121

28 Jul 2026, 03:20 UTC≈3,130 views122 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Nega kechikyapti deb mahzun bo’laverma… -Balki kimningdir duosida shunchalik chuqur joy olgandirsan-ki, taqdir seni hech kimga yozishga jur’at qilolmayapti, Alloh senga eng hayrlisini atab qo’ygandir! -bir go’zal jumla bor edi… kechiktirayotgan bo’lsa, balki go’zallashtirayotgandir Allohim!

122

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @vuhayba571. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 392,049 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вухайба ོ” (@vuhayba571), 4,266 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vuhayba571.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.