Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Смысловые коммуникации

@vsmyslcom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,130subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001839085395
TypeChannel
Username@vsmyslcom
Created11 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vsmyslcom

Growth

1,1301,1341,1326 August 2026 — 1,134 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,134 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,133 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,130 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,129–1,135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:071,130-3
9 Aug 2026, 21:521,133-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:381,134no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:031,134first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
119.3%
avg views ÷ 1,130 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.161%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (31 October 202531 July 2026)
Views total8,086
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3843.7%
💯1820.7%
🔥66.90%
👀44.60%
🤔44.60%
👍33.45%
👏33.45%
❤‍🔥22.30%
💘22.30%
💩22.30%
🤪22.30%
👎11.15%
🤓11.15%
🦄11.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC55 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Написала статью для Т-Бизнес секретов на животрепещущую тему KPI — от кого зависит его выполнение и всегда ли клиент прав. Когда KPI провален, подрядчика часто делают крайним — но проблема может быть не в нем, а в заказчике, который сам не дал результату случиться. Читайте по ссылке: https://secrets.tbank.ru/blogi-kompanij/kto-otvechaet-za-kpi/

👀3

28 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC≈3,880 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня не только мой день рождения, но и День пиарщика. Сделала для коллег из Pressfeed чек-лист для ревью PR-отдела или пресс-службы в формате журнального теста. Отвечайте, складывайте баллы и узнайте свой диагноз. Что у вас: здоровый PR-организм, хронический дедлайн, синдром бурной деятельности или аллергия на стратегию. @vsmyslcom

2

28 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC79 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pressfeedFile

С Днём пиарщика — держите подарок, который мы подготовили для вас вместе с коллегами 🎁 За каждой публикацией, инфоповодом, колонкой или интервью стоит то, чего никто не видит: десятки гипотез, правок, исследований, переговоров и часов работы. Поэтому мы решили сделать подарок, который действительно пригодится в работе. Вместе с редакторами, пиар-директорами, маркетологами и руководителями агентств мы собрали в один

2

27 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

7 признаков, что вашему PR-отделу нужен внешний взгляд. Часть 2. 4. PR-отдел постоянно работает в режиме аврала Срочные задачи становятся нормой. Сотрудники перегружены, планы регулярно меняются, а важные темы готовятся в последний момент. Часто это проблема не количества людей, а организации процессов. 5. Результат зависит от одного сотрудника Только один человек поддерживает отношения со СМИ, знает историю соглас

1

22 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC102 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

7 признаков, что вашему PR-отделу нужен внешний взгляд. Часть 1. Руководителю бывает сложно объективно оценить работу собственной пиар- или пресс-службы. Команда постоянно занята. Выходят публикации, готовятся комментарии, согласовываются тексты, проводятся мероприятия. Но остается главный вопрос: насколько вся эта активность помогает бизнесу? Вот несколько признаков, которые могут говорить о необходимости внешнег

👀1💯1

13 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC98 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pressfeedVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

💯2

13 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC102 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pressfeed

Воспринимаете MAX только как площадку для кросспоста? Фатальная ошибка. Такой инсайт дня у Олеси Рябцевой — эксперта по коммуникациям, медиаменеджера и автора канала «Смысловые коммуникации». А вы что думаете? ❤️ — согласен, в MAX другая аудитория, под канал нужен другой контент 🔥 — нет, на канал в MAX пока не стоит тратить большие ресурсы Или пишите, как вы работаете с мессенджером в комментариях — обсудим, у ког

🔥2

1 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC185 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Обычно самым сложным в проектах оказывается не сама задача, а коммуникация с заказчиком. Кто-то привык больше созваниваться и проговаривать все языком, кто-то — списываться и получать директивы/отчеты в письменном виде, у кого-то лучше получается работать утром, кто-то выходит на связь и активно дает комментарии ближе к вечеру. По итогу, эксперт по коммуникациям проделывает двойную работу — «ведет» клиента в качест

👍2

20 May 2026, 08:01 UTC253 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Идеального брендинга не существ… @vsmyslcom

14 May 2026, 09:54 UTC267 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hello505cxPhoto

Рассказали, чем отличается карточка товара, сделанная дизайнером, от той, что может сделать каждый. Спойлер: плохой дизайн карточки уменьшает продажи через снижение заметности, доверия и понятности. А качественно реализованные обложка и инфографика напрямую улучшают ментальное представление о товаре, понимание, отношение к нему и покупательское намерение. Читать подробнее по ссылке: https://dsgners.ru/505cx/44724-k

🤔1

6 Apr 2026, 15:05 UTC357 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Что делать, если разочарован в клиенте. Разочарование — сильная эмоция, которая ставит под сомнение не только продукт или услугу, с которыми работал, но и собственные силы и талант. Ведь на протяжении какого-то времени ты вкладывал силы и душу, а после, выйдя из проекта, потерял контекст, которым теперь живет клиент. И все, что он будет делать, для тебя может казаться глупым, некрасивым, непонятным. С другой сторон

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vsmyslcom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 856,708 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Смысловые коммуникации” (@vsmyslcom), 1,130 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vsmyslcom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.