Уважаемые пользователи, наблюдается атака РКН. Мы уже чиним, но пока ВРубель может не работать 🔧 UPD: ВРубель работает в штатном режиме. Со всеми проблемами справились.
👍26🔥11

Channel
@vrubelrussia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,592subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002623463024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vrubelrussia |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vrubelrussia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 3,592 | +13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 3,579 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 3,581 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 3,585 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 3,595 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 3,597 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 3,606 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 3,609 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 3,607 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 3,609 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 3,609 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
957 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 430 | 44.9% | |
| 👍 | 408 | 42.6% | |
| 🔥 | 98 | 10.2% | |
| 👎 | 17 | 1.78% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.418% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 957 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2025 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vrubelrussia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 September 2025 to 9 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Уважаемые пользователи, наблюдается атака РКН. Мы уже чиним, но пока ВРубель может не работать 🔧 UPD: ВРубель работает в штатном режиме. Со всеми проблемами справились.
👍26🔥11
Уважаемые пользователи. Просим вас дать обратную связь по работе сервиса на текущий момент
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥15👍1
Уважаемые пользователи. Со вчера сервис ВРубель находится под атакой РКН. Мы активно занимаемся устранением всех проблем и предоставлением вам такого же свободного youtube, как и раньше❤️
❤97👍40🔥10👎2
Внимание, друзья! Важные новости о тарифах ВРубель 📢 С 13.04 обновляем тарифную сетку на расширение ВРубель — повышение составит 30 ₽ для всех тарифов, кроме годового. Новые цены 👇 1 месяц – 30 ₽ → 60 ₽ 3 месяца – 90 ₽ → 120 ₽ 6 месяцев – 180 ₽ → 210 ₽ 1 год – 360 ₽ (без изменений ✅) Почему так? Будем честны с вами — за последнее время серьёзно выросли наши расходы на инфраструктуру: 👉 Серверное оборудование подо…
❤58👍42👎9
Уважаемые пользователи! Вышло обновление 7.8.2, в котором были пофикшены несколько багов. Если расширение у вас не обновится само, то сохраните ID и переустановите расширение по ссылке
🔥13👍7❤5
Уважаемые пользователи! Видим ваши сообщения, у нас уже готова новая версия с фиксами проблем. От нескольких из них вы можете избивиться самостоятельно: Отключив Adblock или другие блокировщики. Установив расширение на чистый браузер. Как только новую версию пропустит модерация магазина, даже в этих действиях не будет необходимости.
👍30❤5
Уважаемые пользователи, наблюдается атака РКН. Мы уже чиним, но пока ВРубель может не работать. UPD: ВРубель работает в штатном режиме. Со всеми проблемами справились.
👍77❤18🔥5👎2
🎅 С Новым годом, друзья! Мы очень рады, что этот год вы провели вместе с нами. Спасибо за вашу поддержку, внимание и обратную связь, всё это помогает нам двигаться дальше и становиться лучше. Пусть в новом году будет больше спокойных дней, приятных встреч и моментов, которые хочется запомнить. Желаем здоровья вам и вашим близким, вдохновения для новых идей и сил на всё задуманное. Пусть 2026 принесёт новые возможн…
❤45🔥13👍11
Уважаемые пользователи, В случае если у вас не работает Ютуб может помочь переподключение и переустановка расширения🙏
❤16👍3
Уважаемые пользователи, Мы добавили мощностей и ввели несколько серверов, чтобы ВРубель работал у вас лучше и быстрее💪
❤46👍17🔥8👎2
Подготовили ещё три канала, которые отлично подходят, когда хочется тишины, фокуса и спокойного фона! ☺️ 1️⃣ @CalmedByNature Длинные видео с природой: леса, горные ручьи, дождь, туман. Без лишних звуков или с очень мягким фоном. Отлично заходит для работы, чтения или просто чтобы немного перезагрузиться. 2️⃣ @ChillhopMusic Круглосуточные стримы с ровной, спокойной музыкой для концентрации. Без резких переходов и …
👍18❤6
🍿 Почему мы смотрим видео, где люди просто едят или убираются? Казалось бы, зачем тратить час времени, глядя, как кто-то драит ковер или ест огромную порцию лапши (Мукбанг)? Но у этих видео миллионы просмотров, почему же? ▶️ Зеркальные нейроны Когда мы видим, как кто-то наводит порядок, наш мозг испытывает то же удовлетворение, как если бы мы убрались сами, только без физических усилий. Это «ленивый дофамин». ▶️…
👍15❤3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vrubelrussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Уважаемые пользователи. Просим вас дать обратную связь по работе сервиса на текущий момент
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2025 to 9 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vrubelrussia named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВРубель - ускоритель YouTube” (@vrubelrussia), 3,592 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vrubelrussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.