Channel
@vremir3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001224153422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vremir3 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vremir3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 54 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 54 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 438 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
36 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 36 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вопрос ночи Если бы вам сказали, что все технологии 19-21 века исчезают, но вы можете оставить три — что бы это было? (не учитывая, что для одной технологии требуются другие) Моё: велосипед, поезд, чайник.
Пророки никогда не приходили на землю для того, чтобы говорить о том, насколько Израиль великий и духовный. Обычно их проповедь сводилась к тому, чтобы обличать народ, который многое мнит о себе — народ жестоковыйный. Христос обличал лицемеров, ведь что такое в действительности лицемерие? Это абсолютная потеря адекватности. Ты мнишь себя святым, а на деле — бес. Страшная вещь. Сейчас же появилось какое-то особое нас…
🕊4
https://www.gazeta.ru/social/news/2026/07/30/29007415.shtml?ysclid=msa5bx6mpc694071793
Утреннее политическое — внезапно! Что же это за народ такой, который не может защитить своего патриарха, а значит и свою церковь... А ведь столько разговоров об особой духовности армян... Хотя и русские не лучше. Весь двадцатый век расстреливал святых, пройдёт ещё немного времени, власти переменятся, ветерок подует — и продолжат. Пока что продолжим-ка жить в галлюцинации о собственной святости.
24 года назад случилось особенно дорогое моему сердцу событие. Действующий мер Калининграда Савенко Юрий Алексеевич пригласил британский музыкальный коллектив COIL принять участия в торжественных мероприятиях, приуроченных к 52 годовщине победы над фашистскими захватчиками. В приветственном слове был особо отмечен вклад шизотерического британского подполья в сопротивлении эзотерическому гитлеризму в лице организации…
🕊2
*** Вечер иль день, Душный офис иль тень, Океаны иль реки, На секунды иль веки — Мысль мою о тебе не унять. Но об этом тебе никогда не узнать.
Бессонное Одно из самых ужасных чувств, по-моему, не боль и даже не отчаяние, но наблюдение в себе роста зла. Долгое время ты тешишь себя своим мнимым добротолюбием, вскоре же раскрываешь в себе такого демона, что, действительно, потусторонние силы могли бы ограничиться чисто человеческой психической жизнью.
🕊3
Вечернее Time is crime
Муки словесного творчества Убеждён, что нет хуже творчества словесного. То есть страшнее... то есть мучительнее... Каждая сформулированная фраза то борьба за необходимую свободу, свежесть, прорывающуюся через открытое настежь окно, то милосердный дар духа, завладевшего тобой на мгновение (доброго ли всегда?). Вольные наблюдения. Когда занимаешься творчеством несловесным, но образным преимущественно (куда я заношу т…
🕊3
Чудо? На днях начал читать книгу, найденную в буккроссинге (шкафчик с ненужными книгами неподалеку от дома) года три или четыре назад. Сегодня на небольшой прогулке решил дойти до него и посмотреть, что там и как, давно уже не был. И вот такой странной прелестью меня одарил книжный ангел. Вывод: вспоминайте своих заброшенных книг-друзей хоть иногда, и вам воздастся.
🕊5
Творческий путь Я нашёл оправдание своему писательскому стилю. В этом мне немало помог Василий Васильевич Розанов, вернее история его писательского пути и его первой жены, Аполлинарии Сусловой, одной из возлюбленных Достоевского. Как гласит легенда, она была буйной барышней — образ Настасьи Филипповны списан с неё — и периодически терроризировала Розанова, бедного провинциального учителя, который был младше её на 17…
🕊5
Провокация Почему девушки любят оголяться?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vremir3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 593,678 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“времирь” (@vremir3), 54 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vremir3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.