Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,351–1,401 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 12:59
1,387
-8
12 Sept 2026, 12:17
1,395
+4
8 Sept 2026, 18:59
1,391
+34
3 Sept 2026, 09:33
1,357
-1
30 Aug 2026, 22:34
1,358
-1
24 Aug 2026, 17:24
1,359
-1
21 Aug 2026, 02:16
1,360
-1
17 Aug 2026, 21:52
1,361
+1
14 Aug 2026, 23:14
1,360
-1
11 Aug 2026, 18:34
1,361
-1
8 Aug 2026, 14:22
1,362
-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:20
1,363
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:00
1,363
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
414 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
180
43.5%
🔥
120
29.0%
👍
67
16.2%
🤣
19
4.59%
❤🔥
13
3.14%
😁
5
1.21%
💯
4
0.966%
👏
3
0.725%
👌
2
0.483%
🤝
1
0.242%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
5.88%
1 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,260
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,380
over 16 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqwk7PVK
1
16 June 2026
16 June 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 16 June 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
👇🏻
Дорогие друзья! У меня важная новость.
Мои коллеги, доктор Гаврилов Михаил и биолог-генетик Мальцева Ирина задумали интересные мероприятия:
— онлайн Конференция-Практикум "ЭПИГЕНЕТИЧЕСКИЙ ВЗЛОМ-2026" (27-28 июня 2026 г.), в которой я прочитаю лекцию о том, какие известные в лабораторной диагностике анализы можно использовать для косвенной эпигенетической диагностики.
Регистрация на Конференцию по ссылке:
https…
Как ни странно много интересных выводов, происходит в медицине у меня лично, сейчас попав в тему маркетинга.
Аналитический мозг перешел на новый уровень🤩
Конечно все строиться через деньги, очень сильно. Через разные заходы…И это как новая призма, через которую интересно смотреть на мир. Но не в контексте наживы… ну короче…
Итак дозы:
✅С одной стороны я всегда понимала, что огромные дозы любых веществ, не всегда…
Все мы так или иначе с этим сталкиваемся. У меня сложилось несколько выводов, по поводу дозировок БАД. Что думаете?
Пьем эффективные большие дозы? Или небольшие?
Проголосуйте ! 🫂❤️👆🏻
Last level:
1) понимать и знать, что открыл карту знаний своего дела, на столько, что вокруг оказалось огромное количество закрытой информации = понять, что «опять вначале»
2) передавать знания неловко, потому что признаешь, что они минимальны
P.S: парадокс познания ❤️
3/3
1) это время за которое успеваешь:
а) очароваться делом которое кажется идеальным и интересным.
б) получить прикладной опыт.
в) совершить массу ошибок.
г) признать ошибки.
1/3
Есть мысль, а вернее я лично для себя, приняла это за аксиому:
«для того чтоб стать профессионалом в какой-то области, необходимо 10 лет активного труда в ней». Тред:
Для любителей нейронаук и как все со всем связать ❤️
Трудности с удержанием внимания и концентрации, ментальная усталость, отсутствие энергии, депрессивные расстройства — с этим сегодня сталкиваются и специалисты, и их клиенты.
Чтобы эффективно работать с такими запросами и управлять когнитивными ресурсами необходимо понимать глубинные механизмы работы мозга и владеть инструментами профилактики и коррекции.
В програ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @voyevodina_anastasia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 16 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Путь долгожителя @AgeManagment · 21,254 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Voevodina Anastasia” (@voyevodina_anastasia), 1,387 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voyevodina_anastasia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.