Channel
@votelys
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003710342083 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @votelys |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 21 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/votelys |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 42 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 42 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
86 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 34.9% | |
| custom 5776024040028248730 | 21 | 24.4% | |
| custom 5776274758744152765 | 16 | 18.6% | |
| custom 5776004467862279884 | 9 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5776026178921961554 | 4 | 4.65% | |
| custom 5776221209091906251 | 4 | 4.65% | |
| custom 5775978058108377858 | 2 | 2.33% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Привет наши лп Мы не пропали, мы обсуждаем новые идеи для проекта Мы обдумали, и приняли решение, что будем рады видеть новых людей в нашей администрации , в скорем времени сделаем официальный набор, или же вы можете написать @alw4yscut3 за анкетой, мы будем ждать каждого!
custom 57762747587441527652
Sticker, posted without a caption
️ votely proJeċt 💎德 ▶ pαsƨword ∵ Storყ ꠵ ჩeαrken ༶ 🎁 nαvıg 💭 : У меня один раз закаказали тектовой, для такого странного канала, блин, там продают самодельные вещи как брослетики, и туда подписан 100+ людей, блин, я знаю что обсуждать нельзя, у каждого свое дело, но блин после заказа, мою текстовуху так и не использовали😡 💎新 Ge𐓣ׄerαtıon votelys .cσm
custom 57760044678622798843custom 57760240400282487303👍2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Прощаем парня?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
️ votely proJeċt 💎德 ▶ pαsƨword ∵ Storყ ꠵ ჩeαrken ༶ 🎁 nαvıg 💭 : Update. https://t.me/votelys/238 Недавно мы с ним пересеклись(до этого не общались месяц где-то), на улице, и он заметил меня, подошёл и стал извиняться, типа изменился всё понял и что больше такого не повторится. Не знаю что делать. Вообще он классный парень.. Прощаем? 💎新 Ge𐓣ׄerαtıon votelys .cσm
👍4custom 57760240400282487302custom 57762747587441527652
Sticker, posted without a caption
️ votely proJeċt 💎德 ▶ pαsƨword ∵ Storყ ꠵ ჩeαrken ༶ 🎁 nαvıg 💭 : У меня был парень, который перед каждым праздником(за пару недель, дней), ссорился со мной. Сначала я не предавала этому значения, а потом это сложилось в закономерность. Мы уже давно не вместе, но мне стало интересно, как часто так делают парни? Были ли у вас такие образцы в жизни, и как вы тогда себя повели? 💎新 Ge𐓣ׄerαtıon …
👍3custom 57762747587441527653custom 57760240400282487302custom 57760044678622798841custom 57762212090919062511
Sticker, posted without a caption
️ votely proJeċt 💎德 ▶ pαsƨword ∵ Storყ ꠵ ჩeαrken ༶ 🎁 nαvıg 💭 : Я хотела цветы, намекнула парню, а он скинул фото из пинтераста, с подписью "вот тебе цветы, смотри сколько хочешь". Типа они слишком дорогие... Но фото?... Угадайте кто был заблокирован.)) Ваше мнение? Фото не такие были, но просто к примеру. Давно было, просто вспомнился этот кретин. 💎新 Ge𐓣ׄerαtıon votelys .cσm
👍4custom 57760240400282487304custom 57760261789219615544custom 57762747587441527651
Sticker, posted without a caption
️ votely proJeċt 💎德 ▶ pαsƨword ∵ Rеgıstrαtıon ꠵ Socıαl updαte 🔗 : profıle #Heatofme 💎新 Ge𐓣ׄerαtıon votelys .cσm
👍5custom 57760240400282487303custom 57760044678622798842custom 57762747587441527651
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @votelys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Прощаем парня?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 11 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 190,954 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“奈 » 𝐕𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 ─ 𝑵ew 𝗉r̠j̠” (@votelys), 42 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/votelys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.