Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for По праву Востока

Channel

По праву Востока

@vostokpravo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,981subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001770788620
TypeChannel
Username@vostokpravo
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vostokpravo

Growth

1,9811,9841,982.56 August 2026 — 1,984 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,984 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,983 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,981 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,981–1,984 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:461,981-2
9 Aug 2026, 19:011,983-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:321,984no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:321,984first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 1,981 subscribers
Avg views / post
362
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (23 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,623
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2438.1%
🔥2438.1%
1320.6%
👎11.59%
🙏11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC179 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Неделя началась с хороших новостей. Вчера было опубликовано решение Апелляционного суда Дубая, которым оставлено в силе решение суда первой инстанции по одному из самых громких коммерческих споров последнего времени. Мы представляли интересы ответчиков и смогли сохранить решение об отказе в удовлетворении иска на сумму свыше 160 миллионов долларов США. Но особенно важно не только само решение, а его значение для су

🔥5

5 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC231 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Первый иностранный адвокат в официальном реестре адвокатов ОАЭ. Что на самом деле произошло? На этой неделе многие СМИ сообщили, что британский юрист Byron James стал первым иностранным адвокатом, включенным в официальный реестр адвокатов ОАЭ. Но самое интересное здесь не сама новость, а процедура, которая стоит за этим решением. Важно понимать, что речь идет не обо всех судах ОАЭ, а о Civil Family Court Абу-Даби

6

5 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC274 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Приятные новости. Вчера прошла церемония награждения рейтинга WEALTH Navigator «Юристы для частного капитала 2026». Если честно, к рейтингам я всегда отношусь спокойно. Для юриста лучший рейтинг - это клиент, который возвращается второй раз и рекомендует тебя друзьям. Но есть исключения. WEALTH Navigator довольно узкоспециализированное исследование. Оно посвящено не всему юридическому рынку, а именно сопровождени

🔥4👍3

3 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC299 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Партнеры и коллеги, Как большой друг ПравоТех, хочу поделиться интересной инициативой, которая, на мой взгляд, хорошо показывает, как сегодня должен развиваться юридический ИИ. 💼 Справится ли ИИ с вашей юридической задачей? ПравоКонсультант готовит полноценное правовое заключение с выводами, аргументацией и судебной практикой. Но главное правило остается неизменным: окончательное решение всегда принимает юрист. С

1 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC378 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Поздравляю моего партнера, Dr. Khaled Alhadhrami, с публикацией новой статьи в CPJ Law Journal! 👏 Работа посвящена теме, с которой юристам приходится сталкиваться все чаще, киберпреследованию, онлайн-клевете, цифровому вымогательству и их финансовым последствиям. Что показалось особенно интересным с практической точки зрения? ▪️ Автор показывает, что в ОАЭ дела о киберпреступлениях - это уже давно не только про уг

🔥3👎1

31 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC377 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не каждое дело доходит до Верховного суда Англии. И уж точно не каждое заканчивается изменением судебной практики. Поэтому сегодня хочется поздравить нашего Counsel Bledi Albri с действительно выдающимся профессиональным достижением. В деле Drelle v Servis-Terminal LLC [2026] UKSC 29 Бледи представлял интересы стороны в Supreme Court of the United Kingdom — высшей судебной инстанции Англии и Уэльса. Более того, Вер

👍6🔥31

31 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC543 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Еще одна победа нашей практики White-Collar Crime в ОАЭ. Совместно с Dr. Khaled Ali Alhadhrami нашей команде удалось добиться освобождения клиента из-под стражи менее чем за 24 часа после задержания по линии INTERPOL Red Notice. Подобные дела требуют не только глубокого знания уголовного права ОАЭ, но и опыта работы с международными механизмами Интерпола, экстрадиции и экстренной судебной защиты. Продолжаем защища

🔥65👍3

30 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC419 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We would like to express our sincere apologies to Alaryani Advocates & Legal Consultants for our incorrect interpretation of the DIFC Court’s judgment in our Telegram publication. Our comments were based on our own understanding of the decision, and it was never our intention to misrepresent the Court’s findings or to make any adverse or inaccurate statements about Alaryani Advocates & Legal Consultants. We sincere

🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @vostokpravo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 458,076 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“По праву Востока” (@vostokpravo), 1,981 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vostokpravo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.