Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Валентина Марченко

Channel

Валентина Марченко

@vorovkakniggg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,992subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001696236783
TypeChannel
Username@vorovkakniggg
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vorovkakniggg

Growth

3,99215 September 2026 — 3,992 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,992 subscribers15 September 202616 September 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,988–3,996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 23:363,992no change
15 Sept 2026, 11:223,992first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

765 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
32041.8%
👍13818.0%
🔥13517.6%
💯759.80%
❤‍🔥496.41%
🤯253.27%
😁101.31%
👏91.18%
🍓30.392%
🥰10.131%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 765 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Apr 2026, 00:41 UTC≈1,520 views27 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @MagnifiqueMoodPhoto

Самые душные в мире парфюмерии, не духи … а эксперты со своим опытом, мнением и бэкграундом 🤪🙏 — «это слишком попсово» — «я воспринимаю только ароматы во флаконе» — «это уже у всех» — «это не мой уровень» итп И обязательно с лицом, как будто давали присягу на «парфюмерной библии» Спойлер: Можно долго спорить о понятии качества парфюма. Но прежде всего хороший парфюм тот, что оправдывает ожидания его владельца ))

20💯5🍓2

21 Mar 2026, 04:44 UTC≈2,610 views24 reactionsread 15 September 2026

То есть когда люди смотрят фильмы, ролики - все в наушниках. А как «орать» в диалогах-это пожалуйста, слушайте…. Я еще, чтобы вы понимали, сидела с ней рядом. Сначала она ооочень громко поговорила по телефону. Ладно думаю. Но потом начался этот пздц

💯213

21 Mar 2026, 04:39 UTC≈2,490 views32 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤯25😁52

21 Mar 2026, 04:37 UTC≈2,390 views24 reactionsread 15 September 2026

У меня уже мозг взорвался 🤯🤯🤯 Ну можно же потише говорить, сядьте да болтайте между собой…

13👍7🔥4

21 Mar 2026, 04:37 UTC≈2,280 views39 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💯363

14 Mar 2026, 05:50 UTC≈2,840 views28 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍199

12 Mar 2026, 11:40 UTC≈2,900 views9 reactionsread 15 September 2026

Ребята! Хабаровск! Ищу рилсмейкера для личной работы, если знаете таких - буду благодарна! ❤️

9

11 Mar 2026, 07:50 UTC≈2,950 views61 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

36🔥24🍓1

11 Mar 2026, 07:49 UTC≈2,490 views85 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

Обновилась к весне 🌸✨

❤‍🔥49👍18🔥17🥰1

9 Mar 2026, 04:37 UTC≈2,500 views41 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍2212💯7

9 Mar 2026, 04:35 UTC≈2,410 views29 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

24😁5

9 Mar 2026, 04:27 UTC≈2,680 views36 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

25🔥8💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vorovkakniggg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Рязань | События | Новости
@Ryazan_narod · 24,832
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Валентина Марченко” (@vorovkakniggg), 3,992 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vorovkakniggg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.