Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for volleyball.ua

Channel

volleyball.ua

@volleyballua

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,149subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001180542556
TypeChannel
Username@volleyballua
Created11 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/volleyballua

Growth

3,1413,1493,1457 August 2026 — 3,141 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,141 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,143 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,149 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,140–3,150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 05:463,149+6
10 Aug 2026, 23:433,143+2
7 Aug 2026, 04:453,141no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:333,141first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.8%
avg views ÷ 3,149 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total28,830
Reactions total756
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

756 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
37850.0%
👍9112.0%
🤬597.80%
😢526.88%
🔥506.61%
💩334.37%
🤡182.38%
❤‍🔥162.12%
👏141.85%
🤣121.59%
😱111.46%
👎50.661%
😭40.529%
🍌30.397%
🏆20.265%
💔20.265%
🥴20.265%
😁10.132%
😎10.132%
😘10.132%
1 further kind10.132%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 756reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,160 views102 reactionsread 7 August 2026

росія не зіграє на чоловічому Кубку світу-2027 https://www.volleyball.ua/news/11486-rosiia-ne-zigraie-na-cholovichomu-kubku-svitu-2027

51👍27🤣12🔥7🍌3👎1🦄1

4 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,390 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

“Це негарно і неприпустимо”. Президент ФВУ прокоментував повернення росії до Ліги націй https://www.volleyball.ua/news/11487-tse-negarno-i-nepripustimo-prezident-fvu-prokomentuvav-povernennia-rosiyi-do-ligi-natsii

22🤡11❤‍🔥2😢2

4 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,450 views102 reactionsread 7 August 2026

FIVB офіційно підтвердила повернення росії до Ліги націй-2027 https://www.volleyball.ua/news/11485-fivb-ofitsiino-pidtverdila-povernennia-rosiyi-do-ligi-natsii-2027

🤬57💩33🤡73🥴2

2 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,550 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Польща вдруге поспіль виграла Лігу націй 🥇🏆🇵🇱 https://www.volleyball.ua/nations-league/11483-polshcha-vdruge-pospil-vigrala-ligu-natsii

👍26🔥108👎3👏2🤬2🏆1

2 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC≈1,540 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Хто стане переможцем Ліги націй-2026?

  1. Польща 🇵🇱56%
  2. 🇺🇸 США44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8👍2😎1

2 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC≈2,240 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чинні переможці турніру проти збірної, яка перервала безпрограшну серію Японії та здолала чемпіонів світу. На нас чекає вирішальна битва за золото🏆🥇 🇺🇸 США — Польща 🇵🇱 🏐 Фінал 📅 2 cерпня (неділя) ⏰ 14:30 (за київським часом) 📍Нінбо, Китай ТРАНСЛЯЦІЯ 📺

🔥18❤‍🔥43

2 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC≈1,280 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Словенія вперше в історії здобула медалі Ліги націй https://www.volleyball.ua/nations-league/11482-sloveniia-vpershe-v-istoriyi-zdobula-medali-ligi-natsii

👍16😱6😭2🏆1

2 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC≈1,400 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Хто стане бронзовим призером Лiги нацiй-2026? 🥉

  1. Японiя 🇯🇵85%
  2. 🇸🇮 Словенiя15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4👍1

2 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC≈1,430 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Японія зазнала першої поразки лише у півфіналі, а Словенія втретє поспіль не змогла подолати цю стадію. Хто завершить Лігу націй-2026 на мажорній ноті? 🇯🇵 Японія — Словенія 🇸🇮 🏐 Матч за третє місце 📅 2 cерпня (неділя) ⏰ 10:40 (за київським часом) 📍Нінбо, Китай ВІДЕО-ТРАНСЛЯЦІЯ 📺

9👍4

1 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,380 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

США зупинили непереможну Японію та вийшли до фіналу Ліги націй-2026 https://www.volleyball.ua/nations-league/11481-ssha-zupinili-neperemozhnu-iaponiiu-ta-viishli-do-finalu-ligi-natsii-2026

😢32👏9😱54❤‍🔥3😭2👍1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC≈1,350 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзі, матч 🔥 попереду вирішальний пʼятий сет🏐 Вмикайтеся🖥️

13👎1

1 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,350 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Хто вийде у фінал Ліги націй?

  1. Японія 🇯🇵63%
  2. 🇺🇸 США37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @volleyballua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTCFinal Results340 voters

Хто стане переможцем Ліги націй-2026?

  1. Польща 🇵🇱56%
  2. 🇺🇸 США44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTCFinal Results368 voters

Хто стане бронзовим призером Лiги нацiй-2026? 🥉

  1. Японiя 🇯🇵85%
  2. 🇸🇮 Словенiя15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTCFinal Results307 voters

Хто вийде у фінал Ліги націй?

  1. Японія 🇯🇵63%
  2. 🇺🇸 США37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTCFinal Results315 voters

Хто стане перший фіналістом Ліги Націй-2026?

  1. 🇸🇮 Словенія14%
  2. Польща 🇵🇱86%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,172,307 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“volleyball.ua” (@volleyballua), 3,149 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/volleyballua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.