Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Вольф пишет про ютуб

@volfpishet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,006subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002063469947
TypeChannel
Username@volfpishet
Created27 December 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/volfpishet

Growth

5,0065,0325,0195 August 2026 — 5,032 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,032 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,025 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,017 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,006 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,002–5,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:165,006-11
10 Aug 2026, 05:135,017-8
6 Aug 2026, 23:465,025-7
6 Aug 2026, 03:485,032no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:005,032first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

980 reactions across 19 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33834.5%
👍26426.9%
🔥22823.3%
🤯767.76%
👏121.22%
😁121.22%
🤔111.12%
👎70.714%
😢60.612%
❤‍🔥50.51%
🥱40.408%
🏆30.306%
🎄20.204%
💊20.204%
😱20.204%
🐳10.102%
👌10.102%
💘10.102%
😭10.102%
😴10.102%
3 further kinds30.306%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 980reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 14 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @volfpishet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2025 to 14 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Jan 2026, 13:28 UTC≈3,820 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Друзья, начинаем год продуктивно с новогодними скидочками! Приходите ко мне на индивидуальные консультации по ютубу за 500 евро вместо 700. Тут можно посмотреть чеклист консультации и увидеть,, какие темы мы сможем обсудить. Без лишней скромности скажу, что я консультировала бизнесы большие и маленькие, и большую часть самых известных российских блогеров, и начинающих блогеров. Все остаются в восторге! Альтернативн

26🤯7🎄2😴1🙊1

14 Oct 2025, 13:44 UTC≈4,800 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Помогите с Meta? Друзья, простите за мой французский, но почему рекламный кабинет meta – такое говно? Кто умеет этим пользоваться и настраивать, давайте поменяемся знаниями? Я вам — про ютуб, вы мне про рекламу в инстаграме 🙂 Это просто ужас какой-то, я половину дня пытаюсь в один рекламный кабинет добавить несколько аккаунтов инстаграм — не выходит! Кнопка Add assets — серая и все тут, не нажимается. Или например

😁11🤯65👍5

14 Oct 2025, 09:06 UTC≈4,180 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Один канал хорошо, а три — лучше! ☝️Зачем нужны дополнительные каналы? Основной YouTube-канал Варламова вы все наверняка видели. Но знаете ли вы, что у нас есть и другие каналы? И нет, не иностранные и не запасные, а прямо-таки секретные, непубличные каналы, которые нельзя нагуглить. Нужны они для проверки роликов перед публикацией. Дело в том, что некоторые видео могут не понравиться YouTube. В лучшем случае у них

🔥42👍1610

8 Oct 2025, 09:02 UTC≈4,130 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Какие теги/слова убивают показы на ютубе? Делюсь полезным ботом. Цензура на ютубе очень утомляет. Понятное дело, что с роликами про секс и наркотики надо быть осторожным, но случайно можно испортить себе показы даже исторического видео — например, представьте себе теги в ролике про геноцид. А бывает, что пишешь вроде бы обычное слово в заголовке или тегах — а охваты падают :( Чтобы лишний раз не рисковать, мы собра

👍3626🔥17

1 Oct 2025, 12:16 UTC≈4,980 views89 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Нейросети и сервисы для ютуб-каналов. Какие AI мы используем в продакшене Варламова? ChatGPT – генерация изображений/создание промтов для других нейронок. MidJourney - исключительно генерация изображения. Nano banana - работа с изображением, генерация или замена каких-либо элементов. Krea AI - выравнивание цвета композиции, цвета кожи, доработка "кривых" моментов которая сделала основная нейронка. Stable Diffusi

🔥59👍179🤯4

5 Aug 2025, 10:42 UTC≈63,500 views31 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Люди тратят месяцы на создание контента, который никто не смотрит. Разница между успешным и неуспешным каналом часто не в таланте, а в понимании правил игры, то есть что хочет ютуб от автора. Хорошая новость: за последние 10 лет работы мы с Варламовым совершили все ошибки, которые можно было совершить, проанализировали кучу каналов и начали наконец-то понимать, как работать, чтобы увеличить свои шансы на успех. Так

18🔥7👎4👍2

3 Aug 2025, 12:08 UTC≈4,210 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Псс, ребята! Мы обновили все инструкции, и в честь этого с 3 по 5 августа на чек-листы и гайды Easy Creators — скидка 40%. 🙂 Удачи в покорении YouTube!

18🔥12🤯5👍1💊1

23 Jul 2025, 07:56 UTC≈5,690 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026

YouTube продвигает не клики, а удержание: что это значит для авторов Многие блогеры не понимают, почему их видео не собирают достаточного количества просмотров, даже если контент им самим кажется качественным. Дело в том, что платформа зарабатывает не на количестве кликов, а на времени, которое пользователи проводят на сайте. Логика простая: чем дольше человек сидит на платформе, тем больше рекламы он увидит, тем б

40👍10🔥8👏4❤‍🔥3👎1

18 Jul 2025, 08:01 UTC≈4,490 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Великий китайский ютуб У шортсов есть проблема, о которой знают все, кто пробовал с ними работать, — скромная монетизация. Причина — очень низкий RPM (доход на тысячу показов). YouTube почти не платит авторам за шортсы, и это понятно — видео короткие, рекламы в них помещается мало, а значит и доход маленький. Это делает шортсы не очень привлекательными для авторов. Ютуб это понимает и пытается вопрос как-то решить.

15👍7

12 Jul 2025, 08:03 UTC≈74,200 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Разбираемся, перестанет ли платить ютуб русскоязычным блогерам за рекламу Вчера в тг-каналах и некоторых медиа разлетелась новость о том, что блогеры публикующие русскоязычный контент перестанут получать монетизацию за рекламу. Это якобы связано с тем фактом, что зрители из России смотрят ютуб через ВПН “дорогостоящих стран”, соответственно получают больше денег за рекламу, чем положено (c этих просмотров положено н

30👍22🔥4

6 Jun 2025, 08:01 UTC≈4,770 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Умный найм: как нанимать людей в команду, не тратя свое время Довольно часто я общаюсь с журналистами и руководителями разных медиа, и всегда наши разговоры напоминают “старые песни о главном”. Как тяжело найти подходящих людей в команду, как сложно их заонбордить и передать ценности каждого конкретного канала. Проблема не в том, что на рынке нет хороших специалистов, их полно. А в том, что процесс поиска часто пос

👍15🥱43🥴1

4 Jun 2025, 08:28 UTC≈4,000 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Какая из этих дорожек — нейросеть?

  1. 1 вариант60%
  2. 2 вариант40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤯324

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @volfpishet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Jun 2025, 08:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz651 voters

Какая из этих дорожек — нейросеть?

  1. 1 вариант60%
  2. 2 вариант40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 14 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 626,253 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вольф пишет про ютуб” (@volfpishet), 5,006 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/volfpishet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.