Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

V O I S A

@voisaaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,866subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001620431642
TypeChannel
Username@voisaaa
Created3 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/voisaaa

Growth

3,8653,8713,8686 August 2026 — 3,871 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,871 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,865 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,866 subscribers3,8666 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,864–3,872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:263,866+1
10 Aug 2026, 12:253,865-6
7 Aug 2026, 06:513,871no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:153,871first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.1%
avg views ÷ 3,866 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,590
1 post measured
Reaction rate
17.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held6 (12 April 202620 July 2026)
Views total1,590
Reactions total278
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,116 reactions across 6 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1,02348.3%
custom 546066915440095623940219.0%
💘31614.9%
🔥1175.53%
🍓833.92%
🥰572.69%
🙏522.46%
301.42%
😭160.756%
💋130.614%
🌭40.189%
🤩20.095%
💅10.047%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 6 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @voisaaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 April 2026 to 20 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈1,590 views278 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Принес ребенку новую игрушку хд

💘190custom 54606691544009562394529🔥9❤‍🔥2🌭2💅1

29 May 2026, 11:40 UTC≈2,970 views458 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, сори что не постил, познавал прелести отцовского декрета Короче да, наконец завели с женой котенковую малышню!! Ее зовут Хлоечка 😇

❤‍🔥301🍓67🥰56😭16🔥9💘7💋2

22 Apr 2026, 12:11 UTC≈20,300 views394 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Капец друзья сегодня, получается, праздную дэрэшечку! Слава богу пережил страшное роковое число (27), теперь можно спать спокойно ☺️ Сердечно благодарю за то что остаетесь здесь со мной, поддерживаете лайком репостом, добрым словом, покупкой мерча и фанартиками!!! Я давно бы уже скочерыжился без вашей поддержки честное слово целую в обе щеки 💋 Моя голубая мечта найти себе работу в индустрии, поэтому если вам нужен

❤‍🔥263🔥72custom 546066915440095623948💋6🍓4🥰1

19 Apr 2026, 09:58 UTC≈2,930 views182 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прибежал на Муркет и вы прибегайте!!!!! Оказывается он последний в истории, друзья очень всех жду 😭 Еще в честь моего приближающегося др делаю скидку на весь акрильчик (кроме гачи) и плюшевые значки!!! 🌹

❤‍🔥114💘39🔥23custom 54606691544009562396

12 Apr 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,970 views358 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мб вы заметили по картинке выше что у Тетис произошел некоторый редизайн 🐟 Вот у меня тут рефик есть, не законченный конечно, но я все равно хочу показать

❤‍🔥238💘69custom 546066915440095623935🍓10💋3🤩2🔥1

12 Apr 2026, 14:45 UTC≈3,320 views446 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вспомнил что не выложил картинку с русалкой отдельно 🦑

custom 5460669154400956239268❤‍🔥105🙏52💘11🔥3🌭2🍓2💋2

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @voisaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 215,303 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“V O I S A” (@voisaaa), 3,866 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voisaaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.