Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лилия Дасаева ✨голос для души

Channel

Лилия Дасаева ✨голос для души

@voiceforsoul

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,151subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001565759589
TypeChannel
Username@voiceforsoul
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/voiceforsoul

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1491,1551,1527 August 2026 — 1,155 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,154 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,151 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,152 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,150 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,151 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,153 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,151 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,150 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,149 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,151 subscribers1,1517 August 202618 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 42 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,148–1,156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:211,151+2
14 Sept 2026, 04:151,149-1
1 Sept 2026, 19:151,150-1
26 Aug 2026, 17:131,151-2
24 Aug 2026, 02:241,153+2
20 Aug 2026, 15:471,151+1
17 Aug 2026, 11:241,150-2
13 Aug 2026, 16:281,152+1
10 Aug 2026, 21:531,151-3
7 Aug 2026, 19:021,154-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:461,155first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12473.4%
🔥3319.5%
👏95.33%
🤔21.18%
👍10.592%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC395 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы живем в какой-то сюрреальности, где на глазах в течение дня фантастически «уживаются» взрывы на складах и веселые вечеринки в городе, украшенном цветами, быстро раскупаются поездки в самые дорогие туры на край земли и со сложной логистикой, и долго согласовывается крошечный бюджет на небольшой ивент, где «разбег» от депрессии до эйфории за час или день (в зависимости от плотности событий), где мужчина и женщина ни…

❤24🔥10🤔2

Signed Liliya Dasaeva ️

25 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC273 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Отписалась махом от большого количества интеллектуалов, которые в хтонических конвульсиях через литературу, культуру и искусство ищут смысл жизни в бренной Москве. Ищут, ищут… разговаривают на языке сложносочиненных конструкций лекций великих мыслителей или преподавателей бизнес-школ, думают, как создать идеальный мир для избранных ценителей, при этом тонут в невидимом для них нарциссизме. Неумение слушать, соедин…

❤25🔥5👏1

Signed Liliya Dasaeva ️

25 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC279 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Жаль ее… не стоит убиваться так ради мужчины» Опустим предысторию о том, как младшая дочь любит оперу (рассказать, кстати, подробно?), и начну с того, что мне всегда интересно мнение детей (любых) на классический сюжет. Итак, опера «Мадам Баттерфляй», Большой театр. Итак, Мадам Баттерфляй, это история японской девушки, полюбившей американца. Влюбилась, отказалась от родных своих, корней своих, вышла замуж, была о…

❤16🔥5

Signed Liliya Dasaeva ️

25 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC243 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed Liliya Dasaeva ️

29 Apr 2026, 06:47 UTC630 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sikorskaya_maria

Столько рыдающих женщин в одном месте вы давно не видели. Сегодня была лекция из цикла «Женщины, которые вдохновляют». Выступала невероятная Лилия Дасаева. Я даже не знаю, как можно наиболее точно описать то, что делает Лиля. Например: · приглашает в Россию королеву Дании (и она приезжает); · зажигает огни на легендарном стадионе «Лужники» только для тебя; · закрывает планетарий, чтобы под звездным куполом расска…

❤34🔥8👍1

Signed Liliya Dasaeva ️

29 Apr 2026, 06:47 UTC519 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sikorskaya_mariaVideo

Video, posted without a caption

Signed Liliya Dasaeva ️

28 Apr 2026, 08:20 UTC605 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чтение как новая эстетика, способ развить свое креативное и предпринимательское мышление, а также новый способ точечного касания с молодой и активной аудиторией У чтения есть две скрытые суперсилы: 1. Замедление. Вы не скроллите, не переключаетесь между задачами. Вы остаётесь наедине с текстом ровно настолько, чтобы мозг перестал фоново паниковать из-за скорости мира. 2. Фокусировка на новом. Вы впускаете идею, ко…

❤25👏8🔥5

Signed Liliya Dasaeva ️

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @voiceforsoul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лилия Дасаева ✨голос для души” (@voiceforsoul), 1,151 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voiceforsoul.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.