Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Накачаний тренер 2.0

Channel

Накачаний тренер 2.0

@vladpavlon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,740subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001954344150
TypeChannel
Username@vladpavlon
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vladpavlon

Growth

1,7391,7461,742.57 August 2026 — 1,739 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,739 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,741 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,745 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,744 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,746 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,742 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,743 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,740 subscribers1,7407 August 202631 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,738–1,747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 04:351,740-3
28 Aug 2026, 02:331,743+1
24 Aug 2026, 17:581,742-4
17 Aug 2026, 09:341,746+2
13 Aug 2026, 23:181,744-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:311,745+4
8 Aug 2026, 07:121,741+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:331,739no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:241,739first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 36s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3437.8%
3134.4%
👍2527.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC565 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✅Знову завантажив новий, цікавий відео. https://youtu.be/itQL5Mnxk2I

🔥3

25 Jun 2026, 14:12 UTC961 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🆘Скоро я обовʼязково буду вести телегу як треба, а поки запрошую до перегляду моєї історії. https://youtu.be/3_2Or_wZNdg

🔥81

20 May 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,340 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💪Моє актуальне тренування спини та тріцепса. 1. Підтягування, широкий, паралельний хват 3 робочих підходи по 12 повторів (План виконав) 2. Тяга штанги в нахилі 2 розминочні підходи по 10-12 повторів 2 робочих підходи по 10 повторів (План виконав) 3. Тяга вертикальна по 1 руку в блоці 1 розминочний підхід на 10 повторів 3 робочих підходи по 12 повторів (План виконав) 4. Тяга горизонтального блоку, широкий хват 1 р

🔥143👍2

19 May 2026, 14:10 UTC851 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тут новий відос для вас на YouTube. Завтра покажу ще одне своє повне тренування, буде пост.💪 https://youtu.be/MBSwDb5V_eI?si=iYkfDOffrHqyx028

👍61

14 May 2026, 05:53 UTC942 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Чому я роблю багато вправ в поясі. Частина 2. Щодо іншого типу вправ, таких як жим лежачи, чи підйому штанги на біцепс - трохи інша історія. Розгиначі забиваються, але не так сильно як у вправах на спину чи ноги. Тут більше справа в тому, що пояс допомагає мені відчути більше контролю та стабілізації, що приводить до того, що я можу краще виконати жим лежачи, чи краще викластись в підйомі на біцепс. Загалом, науко

🔥81

12 May 2026, 14:21 UTC928 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💡Часто люди не розуміють чому я багато вправ виконую в поясі, і помилково також починають робити всі вправи в поясі. Поділю пост на 2 частини. Частина 1. Перш за все, я роблю багато чого в поясі, через те що в мене дуже сильний гіпертонус мязів розгиначів спини, вони дуже сильно розвинені, і в багатьох вправах навіть там, де низ спини взагалі не мав би навантажуватись - він навантажується. Відчувається це як дуже

4👍3

8 May 2026, 14:36 UTC931 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

💡Чи треба тут дублювати рілс, чи краще без них тут?

  1. Треба67%
  2. Не треба тут33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 May 2026, 12:12 UTC965 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🚀Моє тренування грудні + біцепс. 08.05.2026. 1. Жим в машині Сміта, кут 45 градусів 3 розминочні підходи на 15, 10, 6 2 робочих підходи по 8, 10 (план був 8, 8) 2. Жим лежачи 2 розминочні підходи по 5 повторів 2 робочі по 5 повторів (план виконав) 3. Біцепс сидячи з нижнього блоку, крива ручка 2 розминочні підходи по 10, 6 повторів 3 робочих підходи по 12 повторів (план перевиконав у вазі, роблю другий раз, підбир

21👍14🔥1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @vladpavlon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 May 2026, 14:36 UTCAnonymous Poll142 voters

💡Чи треба тут дублювати рілс, чи краще без них тут?

  1. Треба67%
  2. Не треба тут33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 11 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Накачаний тренер 2.0” (@vladpavlon), 1,740 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vladpavlon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.