Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VK Знакомства

Channel

VK Знакомства

@vk_dating

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

145,936subscribers

-21,235 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002237736753
TypeChannel
Username@vk_dating
DescriptionМесто неслучайных встреч 💘 https://vkdating-app.ru/install/ 👈🏼 Установить VK Знакомства на iOS https://trk.mail.ru/c/txr1r5 👈🏼 Начать пользоваться сервисом https://t.me/boost/vk_dating 👈🏼 Поддержать канал бустом
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vk_dating

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

145,936167,171156,553.57 August 2026 — 167,171 subscribers7 August 2026 — 167,171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 166,894 subscribers9 August 2026 — 166,625 subscribers10 August 2026 — 166,404 subscribers11 August 2026 — 166,056 subscribers12 August 2026 — 165,604 subscribers13 August 2026 — 165,215 subscribers14 August 2026 — 164,395 subscribers16 August 2026 — 161,320 subscribers17 August 2026 — 157,779 subscribers18 August 2026 — 157,113 subscribers19 August 2026 — 156,444 subscribers20 August 2026 — 156,031 subscribers21 August 2026 — 155,686 subscribers23 August 2026 — 155,888 subscribers24 August 2026 — 155,207 subscribers25 August 2026 — 154,859 subscribers26 August 2026 — 154,474 subscribers27 August 2026 — 154,225 subscribers28 August 2026 — 153,883 subscribers29 August 2026 — 153,589 subscribers30 August 2026 — 153,312 subscribers31 August 2026 — 152,765 subscribers1 September 2026 — 152,457 subscribers2 September 2026 — 150,478 subscribers4 September 2026 — 150,213 subscribers7 September 2026 — 149,406 subscribers10 September 2026 — 148,250 subscribers12 September 2026 — 147,660 subscribers14 September 2026 — 147,310 subscribers15 September 2026 — 146,783 subscribers18 September 2026 — 145,936 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -21,235. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 142,751–170,356 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:56145,936-847
15 Sept 2026, 23:36146,783-527
14 Sept 2026, 05:37147,310-350
12 Sept 2026, 12:39147,660-590
10 Sept 2026, 08:59148,250-1,156
7 Sept 2026, 07:15149,406-807
4 Sept 2026, 10:15150,213-265
2 Sept 2026, 22:55150,478-1,979
1 Sept 2026, 19:44152,457-308
31 Aug 2026, 18:36152,765-547
30 Aug 2026, 17:14153,312-277
29 Aug 2026, 15:04153,589-294
28 Aug 2026, 17:14153,883-342
27 Aug 2026, 16:15154,225-249
26 Aug 2026, 16:26154,474-385
25 Aug 2026, 14:58154,859-348
24 Aug 2026, 17:04155,207-681
23 Aug 2026, 03:11155,888+202
21 Aug 2026, 15:09155,686-345
20 Aug 2026, 15:07156,031first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.40%
avg views ÷ 145,936 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,430
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.304%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held54 (29 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total160,710
Reactions total488
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,530
Videos
≈56
Links
≈358

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,741 reactions across 54 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤57332.9%
🤣28816.5%
😁24113.8%
🔥1538.79%
👍1448.27%
💯844.82%
🗿744.25%
💘382.18%
🤔341.95%
💋271.55%
😍251.44%
🎉130.747%
🌚120.689%
😱100.574%
👏70.402%
💅70.402%
🤩70.402%
💔40.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,741 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 12:29 UTC≈2,780 views27 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣20👍3❤2💘2

24 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈3,540 views12 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Как проще всего получить в ответ короткое бессмысленное «норм»? Очень просто: спросите «Как дела?». Общение удалось, каждый добился того, чего хочет, переписка окончена. Это подойдёт, если ваша цель — прекратить переписку. А вот 16 вопросов, которые точно не дадут общению угаснуть.

🔥7👍2💘2🗿1

24 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈3,330 views9 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Половина любовных романов построена на том, что кто-то неправильно понял намёк. Вторая половина — на том, что намёка вообще не заметили. Рассказываем, как люди намекали на симпатию в разные эпохи. К счастью, сегодня расшифровывать намёки не надо: с активным Премиумом вы увидите всех, кому понравились, в разделе «Я нравлюсь» 🩷

🔥5👍3❤1

23 Sept 2026, 13:26 UTC≈3,620 views31 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Мы проведём быстрые свидания в Москве 30 сентября в Доме Культур. Приходите знакомиться вживую, общаться с глазу на глаз и находить людей, с которыми вам будет интересно! Что вас ждёт: • 3 круга быстрых свиданий — в 19:00, 20:00 и 21:00 • Велком-дринк для всех гостей — на входе вы получите фишку и сможете обменять её на напиток • Подарок за мэтч — пары, которые найдут друг друга на вечеринке, получат игру с вопрос…

🔥12👍9❤6💘2🗿2

22 Sept 2026, 15:43 UTC≈4,020 views15 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Равноденствие на дворе. Вечера становятся длиннее, а анкеты из подборки «Любят отдых и уют» всё привлекательнее и привлекательнее…

👍7🔥3💘2🗿2🎉1

21 Sept 2026, 15:41 UTC≈5,110 views9 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Неловкие паузы на первом свидании могут загнать в тупик. Составили чек-лист, что делать (и не делать) в таком случае.

🔥6❤1👍1😁1

18 Sept 2026, 14:18 UTC≈7,730 views29 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁16🔥5🤣4💯3💅1

16 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC≈9,050 views16 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

У каждого есть то самое место для свидания, которое хочется держать в секрете. Но сегодня мы попросим вас им поделиться. Расскажите, куда вы любите ходить на первое свидание в Москве или Петербурге? В кофейню с идеальным капучино, в любимый бар, на прогулку с красивым видом или в заведение, о котором знают только свои? Нам нужны ваши любимые места — куда хочется привести человека, который вам нравится. Собираем к…

❤12🎉1👍1🔥1🗿1

15 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC≈8,060 views14 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Мэтч позвал на свидание, но отменил в последний момент. Какой картинкой ответите?

👍6🔥4💘3❤1

15 Sept 2026, 10:08 UTC≈8,620 views15 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Что, если познакомиться не на улице, а среди акул и скатов? Встречаемся 19 сентября в пространстве «Море Музыки» в Москвариуме на FLEUR — первом музыкальном фестивале в ночном океанариуме. На территории будет наш стенд с быстрыми свиданиями. Каждый сможет познакомиться с участниками фестиваля и продолжить общение с ними после встречи. Всего будет пять кругов: • 17:30–18:00 • 18:30–19:00 • 19:40–20:10 • 20:50–21:2…

❤10👍3🗿2

11 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC≈10,100 views58 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥17❤16👍10🤣10🗿5

11 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTC≈10,200 views37 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣19❤8🔥6😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @vk_dating. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@vk_dating edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTCAnonymous Poll387 voters

Мэтч хочет узнать вашу совместимость. Что выберете?

  1. Окрошка на квасе 🫗57%
  2. Окрошка на кефире 🥛35%
  3. Отвечу в комментариях15%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VK Знакомства” (@vk_dating), 145,936 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vk_dating.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.