Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Косаточьи креветки 18+

Channel

Косаточьи креветки 18+

@viva_pina

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

39subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003984765150
TypeChannel
Username@viva_pina
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 27 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/viva_pina

Growth

383938.59 August 2026 — 38 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:5639+1
10 Aug 2026, 21:1638no change
9 Aug 2026, 20:1538first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
240.0%
avg views ÷ 39 subscribers
Avg views / post
93.6
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (27 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total468
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
2m 24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4835.8%
❤‍🔥2820.9%
🐳2417.9%
1611.9%
🌚64.48%
😍53.73%
😢32.24%
💔21.49%
😱10.746%
🤯10.746%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
867
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 16 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
500
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @viva_pina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC53 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Внезапно на вайбе сделала скетчик на малышку Сайю Потешное, конечно, ощущение заканчивать какую-то зарисовку, а потом сидеть и думать, мол "это в самом деле я нарисовала? Я так могу?". Никогда не думала, что в 24 года залутаю синдром самозванца, но видимо отсутствие личных работ с онли занятостью работой дает о себе знать. Нооооо зато приятно открывать новые эмоции и учиться снова получать удовольствие от рисования!

9💔2

29 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC100 views7 reactions25 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Кстати не наебал

😍5🐳1🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC103 views15 reactions100 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Покажу вам еще старый недоделанный скетчик, который я переебашу под корень няняняняння Это для юри баланса вселенной!!

❤‍🔥8🌚3🔥3🐳1

29 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC158 views17 reactions20 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ВАРНИНГ ГЕЙ СЕКСЫ 18+ АААААААААААААААААААААААААААААААА Даже не знаю когда это зарендерю, поэтому решила остановиться на данном этапе. В комментах будет версия без цензуры 👻👻👻 #hsr #honkaistarrail #Caelus #DanHeng #DanCae

❤‍🔥13🌚3🐳1

16 Jul 2026, 04:11 UTC91 views5 reactions500 Starsread 10 August 2026

Смотритеееен я тут ееееесть!!!!! Буду озвучивать старшую сестричку! Обожаю этот типаж!🥺🥺🥺

🐳5

16 Jul 2026, 04:11 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

История электричества в двадцатом веке - Трейлер 2 | Дубляж События разворачиваются в 1907-м году в летнюю пору. Жара смешивается с парами угля, выбрасываемыми в небо за счёт массового использования паровых двигателей. В связи с этим Киото практически постоянно окутан густым смогом. Технологический прогресс существенно затормозился, что сказывается и на человеческом обществе: в нём царят консервативные взгляды, приве

🔥21🐳1

14 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC99 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Да. Это нейронка. Да, я это оставлю без каких-либо лишних слов

🔥3❤‍🔥1🐳1

13 Jul 2026, 04:05 UTC92 views4 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

По-моему они о чем-то разговаривают на моей кровати....

🐳3🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 00:17 UTC79 views7 reactions15 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Меня немношк наругали за неактив поэтому буду вам иногда теперь спамить фигней мелкой Рисую себе скетчик диза для витуб модельки уааа Наконец-то получилось интересную головешку сделать (по бокам если что не кошачьи ушки. Чота типа косаточьих рожек, склизких нежных!!!!!!!, которых у них нет)

🔥6🐳1

12 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC69 views7 reactions52 Starsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @HauauboutmePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥5❤‍🔥1🐳1

9 Jul 2026, 23:26 UTC87 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Нямням! Новый фандаб уже на канале! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSX1at5XP/ "Неизвестность" - Трейлер Наутики | Reverse: 1999

🐳2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @viva_pina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,181,492 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Косаточьи креветки 18+” (@viva_pina), 39 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/viva_pina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.