Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Витя в АЙ-ТИ

@vitya_v_it

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,866subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001960083105
TypeChannel
Username@vitya_v_it
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vitya_v_it

Growth

1,8621,8661,8647 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,862 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,864 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,866 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 5 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,861–1,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:141,866+2
10 Aug 2026, 07:121,864+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:421,862-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:321,863no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:101,863first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

676 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29743.9%
🔥18327.1%
👍9914.6%
659.62%
🎉101.48%
😁101.48%
💯60.888%
👌40.592%
🤨20.296%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 676reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 9 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vitya_v_it. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2025 to 9 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2025, 10:40 UTC≈4,940 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я здесь совсем не заметил, а коллажи уже давно перешагнули $100 MRR 🔥

🔥396👍2

8 Jun 2025, 15:07 UTC≈4,540 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дай мне один совет, чтобы начать снимать видео в ТикТок: Купи штатив 🔥

10💯4😁1

8 Jun 2025, 13:28 UTC≈3,500 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот что вам никто не скажет: Пользователи из ТикТок не только устанавливают приложение и покупают подписки — они ещё и охотно ставят 5 звёзд ⭐️

18👍8

8 Jun 2025, 13:19 UTC≈3,100 views34 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Одна неделя - 500 000 просмотров. Всё, что нужно для старта - телефон и аккаунт в TikTok. Если ты до сих пор не снимаешь видео про своё приложение - ты просто теряешь бесплатный трафик.

179👌4👍3🔥1

7 Jun 2025, 13:02 UTC≈2,530 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Фабрика приложений → Фабрика контента За 1,5 года я запустил 12 приложений и одно купил. Сейчас они приносят $24,500 в месяц. Наверное, я уже что-то понимаю в разработке и запуске продуктов. Теперь хочу построить рядом ещё одну фабрику - фабрику контента. В этом я новичок, но у меня есть две вещи, которые всегда работали: упорство и полное отсутствие страха перед провалом. Уверен, получится и здесь. Если есть сове

51👍7

7 Jun 2025, 12:46 UTC≈2,360 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не обязательно быть топовым дизайнером или гениальным программистом, чтобы создавать успешные приложения. Клиентам всё равно, на чём вы пишете код и как устроена архитектура. Им важно одно: решает ли ваше приложение их проблему? Если да - они заплатят. Всё просто.

👍389💯2

6 Jun 2025, 11:11 UTC≈2,340 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Докину несколько полезных инсайтов по ASO Google Play 1. Google Play реагирует на изменения почти мгновенно - рост или падение трафика видно уже на следующий день 2. Наибольшее влияние оказывают Title и Subtitle - меняешь их, сразу видишь результат 3. Изменения в описании индексируются дольше - переиндексация может занять до 3 недель

21🔥4👍3

6 Jun 2025, 10:48 UTC≈2,090 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Два ASO-специалиста в Google Play: 📉 Первый - провалил оптимизацию 📈 Второй - сделал крутое ASO Самое интересное? Это один и тот же человек - это я сам:) P.S. Второе ASO круче тем, что рост пошел из США

🔥18😁74👍2

5 Jun 2025, 15:29 UTC≈2,140 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня просто день подкастов Все знакомые лица: Виктор Бабицкий Аким Касабулатов Интересно, познавательно, с разными подходами к построению бизнеса.

18

5 Jun 2025, 11:23 UTC≈2,050 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Еще пару недель назад мне говорили: да кому нужны коллажи в 2025 году? Но по факту - это один из лучших запусков среди моих приложений. Collagekit - one love 🖤

🔥36🤨21

5 Jun 2025, 10:46 UTC≈1,940 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Жена мечтает поехать на Мальдивы, а пока - «Мальдивы» только в покупках внутри приложения:) По традиции отмечаем первые 💵💵💵 в collagekit.app

19🎉10😁2🔥1

4 Jun 2025, 11:17 UTC≈2,010 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я научился пользоваться режимом Spy в aso.dev 👻 Открываешь конкурента, выбираешь страну и перед глазами вся индексация - просто выбираешь интересное. Это ускоряет сбор метаданных в разы К примеру в CollageKit в версии 1.0 добавлено ASO для следующих языков: 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇦🇺🇨🇦 Английский 🇩🇪 Немецкий 🇪🇸🇲🇽 Испанский 🇫🇷🇨🇦 Французский 🇮🇹 Итальянский 🇯🇵 Японский 🇰🇷 Корейский 🇳🇱 Нидерландский 🇵🇱 Польский 🇵🇹 Португальский 🇷🇺 Русски

95

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vitya_v_it. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 984,812 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Витя в АЙ-ТИ” (@vitya_v_it), 1,866 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vitya_v_it.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.