Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Виталий Евженко

@vitaliyevjenko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

708subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001724214260
TypeChannel
Username@vitaliyevjenko
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vitaliyevjenko

Growth

7087107097 Aug 2026, 09:18 — 710 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:44 — 708 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:187 Aug 2026, 20:44
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 708–710 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 20:44708-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:18710first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

215 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7233.5%
🔥6329.3%
👍3817.7%
😁177.91%
💯156.98%
❤‍🔥52.33%
🏆10.465%
🐳10.465%
👏10.465%
🙏10.465%
🤔10.465%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2025 to 27 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Nov 2025, 11:27 UTC509 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Где ты сейчас?

  1. - в маркетплейсах47%
  2. - ушел жарить шаурму43%
  3. - мой вариант в комментах11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁42🔥2

27 Nov 2025, 11:26 UTC495 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 2026: Год, когда выживут только те, кто ЗНАЕТ правила игры Друзья, привет! Канал молчал долго, но сейчас самое время вернуться. Потому что 2026-й будет переломным. Особенно для тех, кто в маркетплейсах. Вот что я вижу прямо сейчас: 📊 Для предпринимателей в целом: • Цифровизация стала не трендом, а условием выживания • ИИ внедряется везде — от аналитики до клиентского сервиса • Импортозамещение открывает новые н

4👍3🔥3❤‍🔥2🙏1

19 May 2025, 04:55 UTC901 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Команда + Система = Масштаб на Маркетплейсах: Разбираем формулу успеха по Полочкам 🔍 Специально для селлеров, кто готов системно, управляемо и безопасно масштабировать свой бизнес руками команды. 🎯 Почему именно эти критерии? Уже 8 лет Дарья Меланич занимается товарным бизнесом. Из которых 4 года ведёт не только свой бизнес, но и помогает другим предпринимателям расти руками команды 🚀. Дарья торгует на четырех топ

3

19 May 2025, 04:54 UTC671 viewsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет! Приглашаю вас на крутое мероприятие от моих хороших знакомых: Дарьи Меланич (мы с ней записывали подкаст, если помните) и Марата Хабатулина Ловите анонс!

31 Mar 2025, 10:48 UTC≈1,180 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хороший селлер сначала считает прибыль, потом закупает товар. Плохой делает это в обратном порядке.

7💯5😁3🔥1

28 Mar 2025, 09:03 UTC≈1,190 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А почему не начать с товара за 200 рублей и тогда тестить не 3, а 10 товаров? Прилетел коммент. Отвечаю подробно ⬇️ 🦞 Если мы выбираем товар дешевле, то все равно должны будем закупать его — просто в большем количестве. 🕊️ Если у нас товар стоит, скажем, 30 000 ₽, то его покупают 100 раз в месяц, например. А если у нас товар стоит 300 ₽, то его покупают не 100 раз в месяц, а 10 000 раз в месяц. Соответственно, ко

5👍3🔥3

27 Mar 2025, 13:46 UTC870 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как у вас сейчас с финансированием? Берете деньги или ждете, пока ключевая ставка станет ниже? Делитесь в комментах 👇

4

27 Mar 2025, 13:45 UTC833 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍54🔥4

26 Mar 2025, 06:46 UTC837 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎶 Категория автомагнитолы — короткий обзор Наша традиционная рубрика! 1. Объем рынка — 2 000 000 000₽ в год. 2. Прирост категории — 413% относительно прошлого года. 3. Прирост среднего чека — 160%. Это всё — отличные показатели 🧳 4. Первые 5% продавцов забирают 55% от общего объёма продаж, первые 5% брендов — 69%. Чуть больше, чем хотелось бы, но всё равно ниша пока не консолидирована. Просто надо обратить на

🔥74👍4

25 Mar 2025, 14:03 UTC629 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤔 В чем смысл такого бизнеса? Хочу пояснить свой ответ на один из комментов 🧳 Я считаю, что нет смысла заниматься бизнесом, если ты себе заранее обрубаешь возможности для масштабирования. Нет резона начинать с таким зауженным горизонтом. Какой смысл? Я его не вижу. Бизнес ради бизнеса — кому он нужен?! Должна же быть прибыль. Первый бизнес должен целиться в миллион как минимум. А дальше по-хорошему — в 50-100 ты

🔥14😁5

24 Mar 2025, 08:59 UTC696 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧮 Инвест-калькулятор для твоего бизнеса + подробное руководство по продажам на OZON для начинающих Если ты собираешься начать бизнес на Ozon в 2025 году — этот гайд обязательно нужно прочитать! Я собрал весь опыт за 4 года и разложил по шагам: — с чего начинать — как выбрать товары — где найти поставщиков — как посчитать прибыль — и как выйти на доход от 1 000 000 в месяц 💡 Просто прочитай 1 раз — и у тебя будет

4👍3🔥3

21 Mar 2025, 12:35 UTC764 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📦 Какой вы селлер на самом деле? Пройдите квиз и узнайте свой тип! Ребят, сделал прикольный квиз для селлеров 😄 За 1 минуту узнаете свой тип: — трудолюбивый бобёр, который пашет 24/7 🦫 — хитрая лисица с отличной стратегией (но слабой реализацией) 🦊 — или журавль, которого чаще можно встретить на Бали, чем за финансовой аналитикой 🦩 (да, я знаю, что это фламинго, а не журавль, но подходящего эмодзи нет) 📍 Естестве

3🔥2😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vitaliyevjenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Nov 2025, 11:27 UTCAnonymous Poll47 voters

Где ты сейчас?

  1. - в маркетплейсах47%
  2. - ушел жарить шаурму43%
  3. - мой вариант в комментах11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2025 to 27 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,245,526 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Виталий Евженко” (@vitaliyevjenko), 708 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vitaliyevjenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.