Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психология для взрослых с Елизаветой Сионской

Channel

Психология для взрослых с Елизаветой Сионской

@vitalitycode

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,523subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001943129546
TypeChannel
Username@vitalitycode
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vitalitycode

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

1,5231,5741,548.57 August 2026 — 1,574 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,574 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,573 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,571 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,569 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,566 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,562 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,560 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,561 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,562 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,557 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,555 subscribers28 September 2026 — 1,546 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,538 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,533 subscribers15 October 2026 — 1,531 subscribers18 October 2026 — 1,527 subscribers21 October 2026 — 1,530 subscribers26 October 2026 — 1,531 subscribers1 November 2026 — 1,524 subscribers4 November 2026 — 1,523 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 89 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,515–1,582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 07:591,523-1
1 Nov 2026, 16:301,524-7
26 Oct 2026, 17:581,531+1
21 Oct 2026, 09:281,530+3
18 Oct 2026, 02:571,527-4
15 Oct 2026, 02:181,531-2
12 Oct 2026, 06:381,533-5
5 Oct 2026, 16:011,538-8
28 Sept 2026, 06:591,546-9
12 Sept 2026, 18:581,555-2
9 Sept 2026, 04:161,557-5
3 Sept 2026, 22:171,562+1
31 Aug 2026, 07:531,561+1
28 Aug 2026, 00:081,560-2
24 Aug 2026, 20:341,562-4
21 Aug 2026, 02:431,566-1
18 Aug 2026, 07:231,567-2
14 Aug 2026, 22:351,569-2
11 Aug 2026, 11:361,571-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:171,573first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

593 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤40568.3%
🔥10417.5%
💯589.78%
⚡254.22%
💋10.169%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 593 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vitalitycode. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC114 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤13💯2🔥1

Signed Елизавета Сионская

5 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC184 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥13❤12⚡3

Signed Елизавета Сионская

4 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC214 views29 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤22🔥5⚡2

Signed Елизавета Сионская

3 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC274 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤27💯8🔥6

Signed Елизавета Сионская

6 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC593 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

4 минуса популярной психологии Хочу обсудить современную популярную психологию и связанные с ней ложные представления, которые распространяются через социальные сети. Я не рассматриваю популярную психологию исключительно в негативном свете! Сосредоточусь на последствиях слияния профессионального подхода с «народным творчеством». У популяризации психологии, как и у любой медали, есть две стороны: она внесла грандио…

❤22💯5⚡2🔥1

Signed Елизавета Сионская

23 Jun 2026, 08:05 UTC593 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Страх быть покинутой: откуда он и что с ним делать? Тревога и отношения - самые частые запросы в моей практике в течение последних месяцев. Тревога, которая преследует вас во взрослой жизни, берет начало в детстве. Самый первый и самый сильный страх ребенка - остаться без защиты и быть покинутым. Этот страх не возникает на пустом месте: он формируется в контакте с родителями: «Мама, не отвергай меня!» И чем больше…

❤17💯4🔥2

Signed Елизавета Сионская

2 Jun 2026, 08:35 UTC677 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Завершение. И - все только начинается! Я закончила обучение на магистерской программе «Психоанализ и психоаналитическая психотерапия» в ВШЭ, защитила выпускную квалификационную работу, и теперь официально я - магистр психологии. За эти 2 года произошла переоценка ценностей. Я стала больше работать, у меня появилось больше клиентов онлайн из разных городов и стран. У меня есть бизнес-консультации. Я делаю то, что …

❤37🔥18⚡3

Signed Елизавета Сионская

15 May 2026, 09:23 UTC870 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Обещание похоже на кредит «Я обещаю, что я женюсь на тебе». в переводе на правду звучит иначе: «Давай как-нибудь потом поженимся (может быть), а ты полюбишь меня прямо сейчас». За этой формулировкой скрывается более глубокая логика. Если бы человек мог выполнить желаемое в данный момент, он бы просто сделал это. Не понадобилось бы никаких обещаний. Сама необходимость обещать выдает невозможность сделать здесь и…

❤27💯4🔥3

Signed Елизавета Сионская

14 May 2026, 07:55 UTC721 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы часто хотим большего - денег, внимания, любви, друзей, признания. Хорошего много не бывает - так кажется, но в этой гонке мы редко задумываемся о том, что все, что у нас есть, требует нашей вовлеченности. Друзья требуют времени. Сто друзей - это сто дней рождения, сто историй, сто чашек чая в моменты, когда кому-то плохо. Если не вкладываться в отношения, они увядают сами собой. Сколько сил вы готовы в то, чтобы…

❤25🔥7💯4

Signed Елизавета Сионская

11 May 2026, 10:28 UTC550 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кейс: 5 лет без отношений. Что делать психологу? Екатерина*, ей 40. Последние пять лет - без пары. «Пора что-то менять, но с чего начать - не понимаю». Разбирать бывших? Часто это бесполезно. Говорить абстрактно про «готовность к отношениям»? Слишком размыто. Нужна структура, и я нашла ее в методе Готтмана, адаптировав для индивидуальной работы. Сейчас я учусь этому подходу и буду о нем подробно рассказывать. И н…

❤18💯3⚡2

Signed Елизавета Сионская

5 May 2026, 10:33 UTC594 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Есть такой индекс CpW - стоимость одной носки. Это про то, сколько вы на самом деле платите за пальто или юбку, если разделить цену на количество выходов в свет. И здесь открывается интересное: блузка с распродажи, надетая единожды и заброшенная в дальний угол, оказывается совершенно бесполезной тратой. Мне нравится, что эту метафору можно применить не только к миру вещей. Качественные отношения дороги, требуют вни…

❤24💯13🔥4

Signed Елизавета Сионская

4 May 2026, 08:55 UTC579 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вы замечали, как много женщин живут так, будто их главная задача - заслужить чужое «ты особенная»? Для них это - событие. Или другой вариант: женщина убеждена, что с ней что-то фундаментально не так. Она ровно «держит спинку» до тех пор, пока кто-то не разрешит ей выдохнуть. Выходите из парадигмы, где вы - не ок. И выходите из контура чьих-то добрых советов. «Я сама знаю, когда и как мне хорошо и правильно». И …

❤21💯4⚡3

Signed Елизавета Сионская

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vitalitycode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психология для взрослых с Елизаветой Сионской” (@vitalitycode), 1,523 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vitalitycode.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.