Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Адвокат Григорьев 🥑

Channel

Адвокат Григорьев 🥑

@vit_voin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

864subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002460046711
TypeChannel
Username@vit_voin
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vit_voin

Growth

864871867.57 August 2026 — 871 subscribers8 August 2026 — 871 subscribers14 August 2026 — 870 subscribers21 August 2026 — 866 subscribers27 August 2026 — 864 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 863–872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 08:43864-2
21 Aug 2026, 05:07866-4
14 Aug 2026, 19:27870-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:16871no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:19871first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 864 subscribers
Avg views / post
128
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held10 (19 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total385
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 34s
Average length
1m 47s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4039.2%
🔥2524.5%
1918.6%
🙏1110.8%
👌54.90%
💯21.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC96 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Халатность — это не «просто не сделал» и не «забыл». Это отдельная статья Уголовного кодекса, за которую можно получить реальный срок. За 10 лет в прокуратуре я сам расследовал и проверял десятки дел по статье 293 УК. И знаю: большинство людей путают её с обычной некомпетентностью. А разница принципиальная. Что это такое. Это неисполнение или ненадлежащее исполнение должностным лицом своих обязанностей из-за недобр

🔥6

4 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC136 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаю держать вас в курсе по делу об Артеме — эпопея не заканчивается. Напомню суть: в деле есть несовершеннолетние, которые на момент событий не достигли возраста уголовной ответственности. Но это не значит, что к ним вообще нельзя применить никаких мер — законом предусмотрены иные меры воспитательного воздействия. Долгое время нам не было известно, решался ли этот вопрос вообще. Речь, в частности о том подрост

🔥5👍3💯2

2 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC153 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хочется немного поговорить о потерпевшем. Имеет ли он права в уголовном деле? За годы работы — сначала в прокуратуре, потом в защите — я вижу одну и ту же картину: человек, пострадавший от преступления, часто чувствует себя лишним в собственном деле. Порой дело расследуется несколько месяцев, а потерпевшим так никто и не признан, а если признан, то не допрошен, а если допрошен, то больше его следов в деле нет. И он

👌5

28 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC204 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Разберем кратко три меры пресечения. На деле у каждой меры свои границы: что можно, что нельзя, кто следит за исполнением и как долго это может длиться. Сохраните, если тема может пригодиться вам или близким. А если сейчас в похожей ситуации — пишите в сообщения сообщества, разберём.

👍7

27 Jul 2026, 07:12 UTC788 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Сегодня утром на федеральном канале «Россия 1» в программе «Утро России» вышел сюжет о безопасности на воде — о трагедиях во время туристических сплавов и походов. Один из сюжетов — история наших доверителей, потерявших родных в шторм на Белом море. Меня попросили прокомментировать эту историю с профессиональной точки зрения: почему важна регистрация маршрута в МЧС, какая ответственность лежит на организаторах туров

5👍3🔥3🙏3

25 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC239 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня не про споры и процессуальную борьбу. Сегодня профессиональный праздник отмечают сотрудники органов следствия Российской Федерации. Сильное следствие — это не количество дел, направленных в суд. Это способность сохранять объективность, проверять разные версии, слышать участников процесса и принимать решения, основанные на законе и доказательствах. Поздравляю сотрудников и ветеранов следственных органов с п

👍95

24 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC219 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

«Подпишите здесь и пойдете домой» — почему этой фразе нельзя верить? 🛑 В кабинете следователя многие боятся задавать вопросы. Кажется, что спорить бесполезно. На самом деле, вы имеете полное право контролировать то, что написано в вашем протоколе. 🔹 Не понимаете заумную фразу? Просите переписать простыми словами. 🔹 Не согласны с тем, как записали ваши показания? Требуйте внести изменения. 🔹 Следователь отказывается

👍12

23 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC227 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня принял участие в съемке программы «Утро» на «России 1». Выйдет на следующей неделе. Тема связана с отдыхом на воде. Пригласили одного из участников похода на Белое море в июле 2025 года, где во время шторма погибли трое туристов и меня. Говорили о трагедии 19.07.2025 года и расследовании уголовного дела. Пока ответа из Генеральной прокуратуры потерпевшие не получили, но ждём и реакции Следственного комитета

🔥115👍2

22 Jul 2026, 17:19 UTC259 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Иногда уголовное дело, которое суд рассматривает уже давно, вдруг начинается заново. Расскажу, почему так бывает. Многих доверителей это пугает, хотя поводов для паники здесь нет. Дело рассматривает судья. В какой-то момент, уже в ходе процесса, выясняется, что ранее он рассматривал связанное гражданское дело. Если обстоятельства его участия в том деле дают основания сомневаться в беспристрастности судьи, это может

👍4

19 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC253 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня — год, как три семьи из Волгограда ждут ответа на один вопрос: почему в этой трагедии до сих пор нет виновных. Помним погибших и рассказываем, на каком этапе дело сейчас. Пролистайте карточки →

🙏84

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @vit_voin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 234,768 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Адвокат Григорьев 🥑” (@vit_voin), 864 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vit_voin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.