Channel
@vistasdigital
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
978subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002047034663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vistasdigital |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vistasdigital |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 978 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 977 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 980 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 989 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 989 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 9 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
105 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 46 | 43.8% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 23.8% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 13.3% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 4.76% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 3.81% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 2.86% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 2.86% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.952% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что у вас с тг?
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🍾3😢1
Все чаще в директ и на консультациях поступает вопрос — а что делать с Максом? Лично моё мнение такое — пока что Макс не может конкурировать с тг в равной степени (из-за просто банального меньшего функционала). Но при этом нельзя отрицать, что при нынешней политике — платформа будет активно развиваться при поддержке государства и это просто вопрос времени. Мне все это очень не нравится, но выбора не остается кроме…
🔥4❤1👌1
В новом году хочу пожелать вам ясной головы, внутренней опоры и тихой уверенности, что вы на своём месте. Пусть идеи звучат громко, а сравнения с другими уходят. С наступающим Новым годом ❤️✨ P.S. Обещайте себе, что будете самыми счастливыми и поблагодарите Бога за каждый прожитый день.
👍3🔥3
Как определить таких заказчиков? Легко и просто с помощью брифинга и изначально правильно поставленных вопросов и целей на проект. Этому я обучаю своих учеников на большом курсе по СММ-маркетингу, а для тех, кто хочет поближе познакомиться с моим подходом по доступной цене я разработала действительно кайфовый продукт, который окупит свою стоимость на все 200% — это интенсив по SMM-стратегии для новичков и мидл-спец…
🔥4❤2👌2
Часто вижу сейчас в Threads истории от маркетологов и SMM про «токсичных клиентов». Знаю, что среди моей аудитории много специалистов и предпринимателей — поэтому вам вдвойне будет полезен этот пост, тк речь не просто про наблюдения, а про личный прожитый опыт. За последние полгода моего отсутствия в блоге я успела пересмотреть взгляды на работу и подход к проектам. Посотрудничала с Яндекс.Практикумом, IT-компания…
💯4👍2🔥2
Ура-ура! Этот день настал 🤍 Открываю продажи интенсива по SMM-стратегии для всех, у кого есть сложности с аналитикой, понимаем процессов и для тех, кто хочет давать крутые результаты своим клиентам. Что внутри? ✔️ - практическое пособие по SMM-стратегии на 70+ страниц - редактируемый шаблон стратегии - уроки по аналитике ✔️ - уроки по созданию автоворонок - доступ к чат-плейс на 1,5 месяца (бесплатно!) только для…
👍5❤3🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
Я уже не могу держать это в секрете… По-тихоньку возвращаюсь в блог, хоть меня и давно не было в социальных сетях. Если честно — последние месяцы я выживала в темпе больших проектов: (напомню, что я руководитель отдела SMM в биг-техе ✊🏻), поэтому фокус сместился. И параллельно — также проводила карьерные (и не только) консультации для вас. И вот что я увидела за всё это время 👇🏻 У 9 из 10 SMM-специалистов одна …
❤2🔥2😍2
Channel photo updated
😳 СТОП! Ты всё ещё переплачиваешь за ChatGPT? Сейчас покажу, как получать ту же подписку почти в 2 раза дешевле, а твой GPT начнёт выдавать контент, за который раньше ты платил копирайтерам тысячи рублей! 🔥 В моём гайде ты найдёшь: Пошаговую инструкцию, как официально оплачивать GPT гораздо дешевле рынка: ◾️5+ мощных авторских промптов для контента, продаж и Reels. ◾️Удобную Notion-базу: просто копируй → вставля…
🔥4👌2
Хотите расскажу вам как оплачивать ChatGPT в 2-3 раза ниже рынка? Поставьте огонечки под этим постом)
🔥20❤3🙏2
Открыла вакансию — а там… 🤡🤡🤡 Ищут Head of Marketing. С опытом от 5 лет, руководителя, стратега. Задачи (ВНИМАНИЕ!): «настройка таргета, съёмка Reels, монтаж, SEO, ведение сторис и аккаунта». Простите, а ниче тот факт, что это три разных человека? И ни один из них — не Head of Marketing? 🤦♀️ Когда вы просите одного человека «и рыбку съесть, и воронку построить, и тиктоки монтировать» — вы не нанимаете Head of M…
❤6👍4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @vistasdigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что у вас с тг?
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 31 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,260,238 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“vistasdigital | маркетинг и блоггинг” (@vistasdigital), 978 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vistasdigital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.