Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ᴠɪꜱɪᴏɴᴀʀʏ ꜰᴇᴅʟᴏɢ

Channel

ᴠɪꜱɪᴏɴᴀʀʏ ꜰᴇᴅʟᴏɢ

@vision_fedlog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001312363789
TypeChannel
Username@vision_fedlog
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 7 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vision_fedlog

Growth

47 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:014no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:214first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 June 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
105
Videos
1
Links
536

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2024, 14:42 UTC17 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: [ĐɆ₳₮ⱧⱤ₳Ɏ] #TheStarkArmy 🦴 User: 💵💲 EDUMAIL SELLER 💲💵 User ID: 5045279351 Reason: Scammer, don't deal with him

5 Jun 2024, 11:51 UTC16 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: [ĐɆ₳₮ⱧⱤ₳Ɏ] #TheStarkArmy User: 𓆗﹛〄𝙃𝙑🇮🇳𓂉﹜𒊯 𝙋𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙤𝙢 𝙃𝙖𝙘𝙠𝙚𝙧 ␥ User ID: 5488934181 Reason: Scammed @esdeathv3 for 125$ in the name of perplexity, grammarly and quillbot yearly subscription Don't deal with this type of motherfuckers For proof check DEATHRAY_FED

5 Mar 2024, 17:15 UTC25 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: [ĐɆ₳₮ⱧⱤ₳Ɏ] [¢∆] 𝘙𝘈𝘐𝘋𝘌𝘙 𒁂ᐯᗷ𒁂 User: ㅤㅤㅤㅤ User ID: 6512773004 Reason: Scammed 500rs for LinkedIn Iski maa dhande wali hai isliye ye scam karta hai taaki iski maa ko dhanda naa karna pade

30 Jul 2022, 11:54 UTC31 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: \-ᴋɪᴅɪʟᴏsᴋᴀ-/ 🇮🇳 User: 🦋્᭄͜͡𝘽𝙐𝙏𝙏𝞒𝙐 𝙌𝙐𝞝𝞝𝞟 »⃟࿐𓄂𓆩𝙍.𝞑.𝙁𓆪ʷᵃʳʳⁱᵒʳ࿐ User ID: 5126128369 Reason: Kadalsuvanji group member

30 Jul 2022, 11:54 UTC29 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: \-ᴋɪᴅɪʟᴏsᴋᴀ-/ 🇮🇳 User: ꧁•ᬼ̩̞̝̩̞̝̩̝̩̞̻̝̞͍͚͙̾̎̾̎̾̎̾̂̑༒ʙᴜᴛᴛᴇʀꜰʟʏ༒•ᬼ̩̞̝̩̞̝̩̝̩̞̻̝̞͍͚͙̾̎̾̎̾̎꧂ User ID: 2049898434 Reason: Kadalsuvanji group member

6 Jul 2021, 22:00 UTC20 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: #RDPwaale Back User: ☞𝗠𝗥๛NͥoOͣBͫܔ User ID: 1876106921 Reason: Scammer Supporter probably a scammer. Supporting @harsh_hun_bc in his scams. Have fake scrapped groups. No personal issues with this guy just he supporting a scammer. Proofs @harsh_hun_bcscam @harsh_hun_bcripper

26 Jun 2021, 15:45 UTC21 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: GianBhai User: ༒[☠Ⱥ฿ℏᎥຮꫝⅇҟ☠]༒ User ID: 886413312 Reason: ABUSING HIS DAD PROOFS - @ITZ_ITACHI

26 Jun 2021, 14:44 UTC20 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: GianBhai User: (に手ɕ) User ID: 1261586065 Reason: Money Doubling Scammer. #nounfban #Scammer. Proofs https://t.me/fbanlogs/1017

25 Jun 2021, 20:19 UTC21 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: GianBhai User: Priya User ID: 1781607553 Reason: imposter pretending to be @bro_xd asking for loans proofs - https://t.me/proofs_fban/34

21 Jun 2021, 20:15 UTC16 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: GianBhai User: Manager User ID: 673793577 Reason: kid misusing admin rights. Banned by his daddy @gianbhaiofficial for giving fake bans. #Toxic #nounfban

19 Jun 2021, 12:48 UTC16 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: GianBhai User: ᴀʀᴄʜɪᴇ User ID: 1400339520 Reason: SCAMMED 54$ Proofs - @mehunkon #SCAMMER

17 Jun 2021, 06:30 UTC14 viewsread 13 August 2026

New FedBan Fed: 𝕍𝕚𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔽𝕖𝕕|[@vision_fed] FedAdmin: GianBhai User: 𝗜𝗧𝗔𝗖𝗛𝗜 🇮🇳 User ID: 1721155584 Reason: Making Fake Id of other people and scamming proofs - https://t.me/proofs_fban/25

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vision_fedlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᴠɪꜱɪᴏɴᴀʀʏ ꜰᴇᴅʟᴏɢ” (@vision_fedlog), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vision_fedlog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.