Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 26 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,401–2,445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Oct 2026, 09:36
2,406
-2
24 Oct 2026, 18:00
2,408
+1
21 Oct 2026, 20:25
2,407
-6
18 Oct 2026, 15:39
2,413
-3
15 Oct 2026, 18:56
2,416
-4
12 Oct 2026, 20:40
2,420
-12
6 Oct 2026, 06:01
2,432
-8
1 Oct 2026, 11:22
2,440
no change
1 Oct 2026, 10:47
2,440
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.91%
avg views ÷ 2,406 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held
16 (9 July 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total
94
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
206 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
71
34.5%
🔥
68
33.0%
custom 5238165358564613794
48
23.3%
👍
10
4.85%
😁
8
3.88%
🤔
1
0.485%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vishnewskyi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В какой соц.сети больше денег в 2026?
Как и всегда — зависит от аудитории. Не устану повторять золотое правило, что аудитория важнее всех мнений блогеров и инфоцыган.
Ни один купленный и просмотренный курс не даст этой уверенности, как совершенный лично тобой ошибки на практике)
Если вам интересно узнать про продажи ВК или какие ошибки не нужно допукать — тыкайте реакции.
Хочу все таки записать серию топ-20 фака…
Архивный секретный тайный запретный скриншот😎
Датируется данное непотребство аж маем 2022г.
Видите некую странность? Вас ниче не смущает? Ну. Рассказываю 💪
Выжимать из трафика дешевые лиды — это задача со звездочкой. Тогда не считали ТБ (точка безубыточности) , не смотрели на юнит экономику и не знали САС. ✍️
Была задача налить — налили) Рад ли был клиент? Разумеется нет. 🎩
Если бы показатели улучшались — тогда…
Ученные из института интриги выяснили кое-что интересное.
Тут провели соц опрос среди предпринимателей и фрилансеров.
Причина — каждый третий бизнес в России закрывается. НО!
При этом на рынок каждый месяц выходит тысячи ссмщиков, маркетологов, контент креаторов итд… тех кто должен решать эту проблему)
У тех кто закрылся зачастую с маркетингом было все в порядке — от стратегии до смыслов. В итоге в каждом таком п…
Друзья, есть среди нас монтажеры?))
Есть проекты на монтаж простых роликов — 45 сек в среднем, работы регулярной месяца на 2-3.
Написать можно мне расскажу все детали: @stereohead43
PS если есть среди знакомых кто — можете переслать постик, будем благодарны! 🥰
Каждый день закрывается 12000 бизнесов в РФ.
Когда твой конкурент сдувается и не вывозит это повод для радости. Теперь тебе достанется больше клиентов и денег. Вы ж ради денег делом занимаетесь если вдуматься? ну так вот это не тот случай. 😄
В обычных условиях эту ситуацию можно вообразить как бег на стадионе. Бегут 100 человек одновременно, стартуя с разных точек. Кто-то бежит босым, у кого новые кроссовки nike pe…
Я устал вести блог и развлекать аудиторию , давая пользу бесплатно.
В один момент меня посещают такие мысли и я закономерно перестаю вести блог везде. 👋
Пора признать — бОльшей части аудитории на тебя похуй на любых площадках.
Ты можешь давать им пользы столько, что у человека может мир перевернуться. Но стоит пропасть с радаров — как все про тебя забывают. 😁
Я каждый день вижу, как счетчик скачет то вверх то вни…
Что делать если завалила тестовое задание, сделав не по тз, а как чувствуешь? Действовать. 🤝
Вообще у меня уже есть своя статистика по кандидатам. И если у вас есть команда, или в данным момент работаете внутри другой команды — вас она она может заинтересовать. 🎹
Из 20 кандидатов:
7 не прислали ничего и не отвечают
10 прислали когда захотели
10 уложились в дедлайн
3 сделали по тз
1 будет писать хуйню
С одной сторо…
🤡 Алярма: ссылки формата t.me вне телеге перестали работать.
То есть при переходе по вашей ссылке или ссылке клиента из инсты/ютуба/статьи в телетайпе будет выдавать ошибку и потеряете трафик.
Че делать? Меняем t.me на telegram.me
На примере пригласительной ссылки:
Было https://t.me/+Vf7mYDUE7RkxMDFi
Стало https://telegram.me/+Vf7mYDUE7RkxMDFi
Кроме этого в шапкахинстах этот метод работать не будет.
Себе поста…
❤5🔥2👍1custom 52381653585646137941
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @vishnewskyi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Слава КРАСАВА @smmmarketolog · 19,156 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Даниил Вишневский Контент Маркетолог” (@vishnewskyi), 2,406 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vishnewskyi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
