Channel
@viruswaarheld
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
15subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001893915591 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @viruswaarheld |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/viruswaarheld |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 15 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 14 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2024 to 10 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Het is over de periode van 2020 – 2025 steeds weer gebleken dat dhr. Pasquino niet over de juiste kwaliteiten bezit om een organisatie financieel in goede banen te leiden. Vorig bestuur Dhr. Pasquino geeft in zijn video aan gebrouilleerd te zijn met het bestuur uit de periode 2021-2022. Deze uitspraak geeft te denken om die reden dat dhr. Pasquino tijdens de live uitgezonden crowdfundactie juist het tegenovergestel…
👍1
Einde Blckbx leugenaars? 03 april 2025 Verklaring vanuit bestuur Stichting Blckbx https://www.blckbx.tv/binnenland/verklaring-vanuit-het-bestuur In opvolging op het bericht van dhr. Flavio Pasquino van 2 april jl. waarin hij zijn vertrek bij Blckbx aangekondigd heeft wil het bestuur van stichting Blckbx middels een verklaring openheid van zaken geven over de gebeurtenissen die tot deze situatie geleid hebben. Seder…
RT @huig_plug: In oktober 2021 heb ik tegen Engel gezegd dat hij ver uit mijn buurt moest blijven & zich nooit met mijn klokkenluiders-zaak… https://twitter.com/huig_plug/status/1866219367307923928
de "emigranten" Engel en Pols verspreiden desinformatie over mij en de tegen mij opgebouwde strafzaken! https://t.co/u8pttX1bnL https://twitter.com/huig_plug/status/1866220189517578435
De trekpopjes Willem Engel & Jeroen Pols blijven doorgaan met het verspreiden van desinformatie over mij & de tegen mij opgebouwde strafzaken. Ik walg van dit koppel dat voor JURISPRUDENTIE heeft gezorgd dat TEGEN DE NL BEVOLKING wordt gebruikt! https://t.co/7lkWGpsqiM https://t.co/JgG60B0ybV https://twitter.com/huig_plug/status/1865360626517704786
bron: https://x.com/huig_plug/status/1862845688247148733
Betaalde advertenties van de virusleugenaars van Viruswaarheid om mensen naar Paraguay te krijgen. https://t.me/paraguayadventures. De zus van dat illuminatieplakplaatje van Willem Duivel zit in Portugal en een deel van de donaties lijken in goud en Spanje te zijn geïnvesteerd. Bedankt voor alle donaties terwijl ze jullie vanaf dag 1 bewust hebben voorgelogen. t.me/NLvirusWAAN/1260 -> tinyurl.com/voorgelogen
⚠️Blckbx verwijderd de reactiegroep van hun kanaal en liegt weer! Op 20 juni 2024 schreef Blckbx op hun kanaal dat ze geen controle over de chat hebben. https://t.me/blckbxtv/5674 Op 21 juni verwijderden ze nog wel mensen, veranderen ze de naam van de groep en is het logo verwijderd. Dus een admin is er nog wel maar de eigenaar van die groep is waarschijnlijk weg. Dat ze geen controle over die groep hebben is dus e…
Jeroen Pols (Viruswaanzin) betrapt- 20 Maart (2021?) Amsterdam, die ander is Jan Engel, broer van Willem en ze kwamen die griet met witte jurk en hart tussen de ingesloten demonstranten uithalen. De rest heeft daar nog uren ingesloten gestaan door de politie. De viruswaarheid heeft Viruswaarheid nooit gesproken. 👉https://t.me/viruswaarheld
Niet over Rutte beginnen Willem, kort en langer fragment Jeroen Pols en Willem Engel (als deze AIVD hoeren al zo heten) De viruswaarheid heeft Viruswaarheid nooit gesproken. 👉https://t.me/viruswaarheld
❤1
🟢Toch nog een berichtje van Brigitte van Blckbx Ik heb ook een screenshot van haar eerste bericht toegevoegd omdat ze nu opeens gaat doen alsof ze op persoonlijke titel met me spreekt. Je ziet ook dat we al 2 weken in gesprek zijn. link uit de screenshot: t.me/NLvirusWaan/1260 (ik heb van de rest ook screenshots en een export en je kan dat vanaf hier lezen: https://t.me/viruswaarheld/152) Op 21 juni 2024 heeft ze d…
RT @huig_plug: Tempelier Ennio Senese was in 2022 voorzitter van de Stichting #Blckbx... #Orde_Van_Malta https://t.co/fVsO8KEhkP https:/… https://twitter.com/huig_plug/status/1797727570819199369
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @viruswaarheld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,254,712 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@viruswaarheld named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Viruswaarheid” (@viruswaarheld), 15 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/viruswaarheld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.