Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐕 𝐈 𝐏

@viphproleplay

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003578191654
TypeChannel
Username@viphproleplay
Created13 March 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/viphproleplay

Growth

418 August 2026 — 41 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:3141no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:1541first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 13 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
148.8%
avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held11 (13 March 202618 July 2026)
Views total61
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @viphproleplay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 March 2026 to 18 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC61 viewsread 10 August 2026

Ролевая закрывается. Спасибо, что были с нами. — Ваш V I P.

19 Jun 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,950 views0 reactions25 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⠀ 🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️Отдай свой долг, 🌟⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️окунись в мир ⭐️ 🌟⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀слез. 🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞 🔤важаемый(ая), С огромным удовольствием для нас и с огромный сожалением для Вас, мы сообщаем, что пришло время отдавать то, что вы задолжали нам. Мы будем рады дать Вам последнюю возможность все исправить по случаю возобновления своей работы. Хотели увеличить свои выигрыши в разы? К сожа

19 Jun 2026, 06:23 UTC235 viewsread 10 August 2026

⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩@piarpolokpogp 🤩@piarhogwarts 🤩@piar_rolok_hp 🤩@roleePlayingPR 🤩@piiaarharrypootterr 🤩@prchannelforhp 🤩@piarkawexx 🤩@PRroles 🤩@piarchanelallfandoms 🤩@waka_and_zabini 🤩@harrypottervp 🤩@piarvcex ⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

18 Jun 2026, 17:40 UTC225 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 𝘛𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘏𝘪𝘨𝘨𝘴 • 𝘏𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘺 𝘗𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳

18 Jun 2026, 17:40 UTC237 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

𝘽𝙪𝙨𝙮 – 💵 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙚 – ⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔠🔠🔡🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 𝘏𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘺 𝘗𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 — 💵 𝘙𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘥 𝘞𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘭𝘦𝘺 — 𝘏𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘎𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳 — 💵 𝘎𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘺 𝘞𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘭𝘦𝘺 — 💵 𝘒𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘦 𝘉𝘦𝘭𝘭 — 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘞𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘭𝘦𝘺 — 𝘎𝘦𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘭𝘦𝘺 — 𝘕𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘓𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘰𝘮 — 𝘚𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘶𝘴 𝘍𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘯 — 𝘓𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘉𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘯 — 𝘖𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘞𝘰𝘰𝘥 — 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 𝘋𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘰 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘧𝘰𝘺 — 𝘉𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘡𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘯𝘪 — 💵 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘰𝘥𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘕𝘰𝘵𝘵 — 💵 𝘈𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘎𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘴 — 💵 𝘋𝘢𝘱𝘩𝘯𝘦 𝘎𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘴 — 💵 𝘗𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘺 𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘰𝘯 — 💵 𝘛𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘋𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘴 — 𝘏𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢 𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘸 — 𝘍𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘢 𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘸 — 𝘔𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘉𝘶𝘭𝘴𝘵

18 Jun 2026, 17:39 UTC200 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Возрастное ограничение - 17+ 🤩Норма во флуде - 100 сообщений/неделя. 🤩Норма в ролевом чате - 1 пост/неделя. 🤩Чистка проводится вечером каждого воскресенья.🤩 🤩Задержка поста/ набор нормы в последний день (часы) — предупреждение 🤩3 дня неактива — кик. 🤩Новенькие, зашедшие после среды участвуют в первой чистке только по флудовой норме. 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🤩Политические, национальные темы запрещены во избежание к

18 Jun 2026, 17:39 UTC217 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️🔤ни думали, что победили. 💭Когда двери VIP исчезли, словно их никогда не существовало, а Министерство начало охоту на владельцев подпольного казино, студентам показалось, что кошмар наконец закончился. Немногим удалось выбраться живыми. Ещё меньшему числу — сохранить рассудок. 💭Оставив позади Хогсмид, долги и преследователей, беглецы скрылись в лесах, окружающих школу. Несколько дней они блуждали ср

18 Jun 2026, 17:38 UTC215 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Сюжет 🤩Правила 🤩Роли 🤩Любовные ветки 🤩Фанкасты 🤩Связь с ботом Также возможна связь через личные сообщения с каналом. ⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @viphproleplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 325,476 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐕 𝐈 𝐏” (@viphproleplay), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/viphproleplay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.