Channel
@vipec
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,758subscribers
-233 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003865612601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @baoguangni @vipec |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vipec |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 5,758 | -40 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 5,798 | -32 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 5,830 | -25 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 5,855 | -104 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 5,959 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 5,966 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 5,976 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 5,991 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (2 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,842 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
投稿曝光❗️永盛支付纯属空手套白狼！ 介绍是口令红包反💰 其实压根就没有口令就一串瞎编的数字 介绍别人玩后给什么福利 别信！！！（根本没有）就是骗你的纯割韭菜盘 这个永盛支付真该死啊活不起了一样 活不起就滚回去自首赎罪吧畜生！别出来祸害别人！这种垃圾们就该抓住枪毙一百回！（永盛支付纯骗子！不要信不要信不要信！）包括这类型的一律是死妈骗子 别信就对了✅ 投稿曝光 @klgx_bot 关注大事件频道 @baoguangni
海乐支付一点信誉没有！出现存款人报案，也百分百确定就是一道直流，无视规则不赔付！确认出现这个问题的第一时间我和他沟通，他让我查天眼（这是第一个重点），之后给我说天眼要查的有哪些。待我把所有证据给到他的时候，第一时间他找的借口是：这是二级司法不赔付（然后我和他沟通，规则里面是否存在存款人报案属于一道直流需要赔付单笔？我提供的所有证据都在指向存款人报案这个事实。）接着这个人他又换说法了，说我们把转群退了他没办法处理，因为他和他的上游无法沟通，（这样我有点无语这不就是三四道贩子么？啥也没办法） 但是退押这一点我承认，因为当时压了一万多u在群里，然后一天就给了一单，总共两天走了两单，都只有两三万左右的，我就说了等过几天上了大点额度的在合作，他确实提醒过我们保留群，但并没有说不保留不负责，所以就退押先把u用到其他工作上。但是，但是，但是！你这就属于逃避行为或者自己拿着我的天眼查去找盘口赔钱了！要不然你上来就直接和我说群没保留不负责，那我们…
❤3
#缅甸资讯：大其力查获41名非法入境中国公民 8月5日凌晨，当局在大其力镇区检查站附近抓获2名非法越境中国籍男性，随后在万榜村再查获39人，共41人被捕。 据悉，此次行动与贩DU案件有关。41人已遭拘留，将被依《缅甸移民法》起诉 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 投稿曝光 @klgx_bot 关注曝光频道 @baoguangni
找骗子买的透视软件。谈好价格 一个月1000u。软件测试3天。测试满意了。然后群里面一直催促 下押押金。我这边下押了。然后第五天 软件就不能用。被关停了。然后问什么原因。故意说服务器升级 要加钱。软件一个月的费用。就用5天。现在钱也不退一直叫补钱 骗子地址：TDKFF9Ngbqb3d8pFQMc9BSw4iT761T6eVz 👤 8576371377 👦🏻 棋牌辅助透视 🌐 @pojiepojie1 🇨🇳 Chinese 🕑 已更新 02/08/2026 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 投稿曝光 @klgx_bot 关注曝光频道 @baoguangni
拖欠10万未回款，已失联，有在合作的请注意‼️‼️‼️警惕台州整个地区的资金盘卡卡车毫无赔付能力，今年已不是个例，渠道纯是赌运气，刚开始答应赔付4成，结果也是消失，7月19日风控截止今天直接人间蒸发 ⚠️⚠️⚠️跑路狗用户名: @a123345688 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 投稿曝光 @klgx_bot 关注曝光频道 @baoguangni
@lv288520 有认识此人的滴滴我 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 投稿曝光 @klgx_bot 关注曝光频道 @baoguangni
行业耻辱 辣鸡车队 1.6wu回不起 今天拖明天 明天拖后天 天天就是理由 不是爸走了 就是妈死了 一天拖一天 行业的耻辱 有和他们合作的兄弟们可以明吃不回 对于这种辣鸡 没有必要合作 1w多u 就给你父母留着合葬用吧 @zap56789 @yuwen1332 @quanqiu1548 @SS556681 @ty98779 @hangxin_Dyong @xingkongxiaochuan @xkkh789789 @keke158168 @HXZF_lifu @hangxin_ahong8 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 投稿曝光 @klgx_bot 关注曝光频道 @baoguangni
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @vipec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 686,351 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vipec named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“海外灰产大事件🥷免费投稿” (@vipec), 5,758 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vipec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.