Channel
@vipclub_99
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,608subscribers
-96 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001476156286 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vipclub_99 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vipclub_99 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 4,608 | -13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 4,621 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 4,627 | -13 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 4,640 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 4,649 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 4,657 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 4,666 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 4,674 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 4,677 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 4,683 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 4,687 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 4,694 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 4,704 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 4,704 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
📛Subscription fee is over $5000 for this 3 vip channels, but we are offering you a FREE trail on Telegram in anticipation of the upcoming Bitcoin Super Cycle! - Margin Whale's VIP👇🏻(@marginwhales) https://t.me/+LU8z_FDmAAIwNDM0 - Coin Coach VIP👇🏻(@coincoachsignals) https://t.me/+_BML7vMzJ9JmZmZk - ROSE VIP 👇🏻(@rosecryptochannel) https://t.me/+ulKFetov67wyOTZk Join today! its free for you - 🚀
The 68,000 dollar level is key resistance for now, but the first test awaits at 66,500 dollars. If BTC breaks that level we probably go to the 68,000 dollar resistance, if BTC gets rejected, we might go back to 62,000 dollars. This probably also depends on the TradFi moves on Monday. https://www.tradingview.com/x/8J48hUbF/ 👇🏿👇🏿JOIN US👉🏿 V I P C L U B _ 9 9
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 ⭐️3️⃣ month access to all VIP channels (crypto and forex) Just 7️⃣5️⃣💲 ⏰Until 10 january 🧐Lets join your team🧐 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 🔸@VIPCLUB_MANAGER
Video, posted without a caption
👑︱tm-charts https://www.tradingview.com/x/Mg0F2mgI/
📈 $RLC/USDT — FUTURES 🔴 SHORT — (20X Leverage) 🏳️ Entry Price: $0,9688 🎯 Targets: • $0,940237 • $0,873484 ⛔ Stop Loss: $1,008
⚡⚡ #DOGE/USDT ⚡⚡ Ехсhanges: KuCoin Futures, Bit USDT, Binance Futures Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (40.0X) Entry Targets: 1) 0.07000 Take👇🏿👇🏿Profit Targets: 1) 0.07500 2) 0.08100 3) 0.09000 4) 0.10500 Stop Targets: 1) 0.06500
👨💻Guys recommend us some best vip channels that you used before or you know its good For crypto and forex💪 @vipclub_manager
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 ⭐️3️⃣ month access to all VIP channels (crypto and forex) Just 7️⃣5️⃣💲 ⏰Until 1️⃣2️⃣JUNE 🧐Lets join your team🧐 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 🔸@VIPCLUB_MANAGER
Bitcoin is still not looking good on the daily, despite this small move up today. It's still trading below horizontal support and this is still looking like a very weak bounce off the green daily Ichimoku cloud 👇🏿👇🏿 it's barely a bounce at all. https://www.tradingview.com/x/UvxxPhVj/ 👇🏿👇🏿JOIN US👉🏿 V I P C L U B _ 9 9
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 ⭐️3️⃣ month access to all VIP channels (crypto and forex) Just 7️⃣5️⃣💲 ⏰Until 1️⃣0️⃣JUNE 🧐Lets join your team🧐 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 🔸@VIPCLUB_MANAGER
News Event Tonight ada data GDP, medium impact kalau menurut saya, kecuali angkanya lari jauh dari Forecastnya yah. @VIPCLUB_99
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vipclub_99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔱VIPCLUB_99🔱” (@vipclub_99), 4,608 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vipclub_99.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.