Channel
@vimofvog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,218subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001335211677 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vimofvog |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vimofvog |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:10 | 3,218 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 3,220 | +1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 3,219 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 3,224 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 3,231 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 3,233 | -4 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 3,237 | -5 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 3,242 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 3,243 | -2 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 3,245 | +2 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 3,243 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 3,241 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 3,239 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:48 | 3,242 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 3,243 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 30 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 51.9% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 30.6% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 8.33% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 4.63% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 3.70% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.926% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#черновики Когда вы натягиваете один носок на левую ногу, второй автоматически становится правым. Причем моментально, независимо от расстояния между вашими ногами. Это и есть суть квантовой запутанности. Носочки эндорфиновые Выкройки bUrda Ткань умопомрачительная
🔥24❤1
Эстетика бытия: Эльза Хоск в одежде своего бренда.
❤19👍4
Продолжая про трикотаж.
#сказкананочь ТУПИ. ТРЕБУЙ. ОТЧЕБУЧИВАЙ. Будь, как кошка. Не, щаз не про "выгни спинку и мурлычь". Щаз будут жесткие спецназовские советы по выживанию в этом чокнутом мире, напоминающем тренировку у кроссфитовца с раздвоением личности: Чтобы выжить , делай, как кошка: -ТУПИ. Если происходит что-то непонятное, ненужное и совсем не вовремя. Например, тебя просят выйти на работу в выходные, или занять денег, или пом…
❤21💯9🔥1😁1
Что у нас в тренде соцсетей? А в тренде – говорить и показывать жизнь без прикрас и фильтров. А я наговорилась, и Я без фильтров (и даже без биоревитализации 2 года)) просто наблюдаю и показываю себя (редко, но показываю, потому что визуал – то, что хочу получать, то и отдаю). Да и смысл говорить? Мысли у большинства людей схожи, разнится лишь стиль повествования. Зачем повторять то, что и так известно большинству?…
❤15
Не похоти ради, строго для услады глаз: один из лучших российских актёров, отдаётся своему делу самозабвенно. Не фальшивит и точно попадает в амплуа)
🔥8😁4😍1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @vimofvog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пока ты спал💋” (@vimofvog), 3,218 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vimofvog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.