Channel
@vikentia_v
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
8,098subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001741682140 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vikentia_v |
| Description | Личные сообщения @vikentia_vv Вк https://vk.ru/vikentia_v Маркеры: https://t.me/+NZo1B6T8uGViOTky Витрина наличия: https://t.me/vikentia_vitrina https://taplink.cc/vikentia_v |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vikentia_v |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 8,098 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 8,110 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 8,105 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 8,099 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 8,098 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 8,098 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (23 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 43,610 |
| Reactions total | 2,590 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,590 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1,595 | 61.6% | |
| ❤ | 537 | 20.7% | |
| 👍 | 393 | 15.2% | |
| 🥰 | 38 | 1.47% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 0.618% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 0.232% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 0.193% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,590reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет! Ну вот, Сетка готова, друг доволен, что еще надо) Связано по МК Викентии https://t.me/vikentia_v "Просто сетка". Лен 100% Lino Premium Loro Piana 630м в два сложения, крючок 3,0 мм, 275 гр. На очереди еще один проект Для друга. #слава_богу_ты_ушел
🔥191👍59❤19👏2
Простой шнурок. Можно использовать как пояс, как вставки в рукава, в горловину, завязки у косынки связать. Просто включить фантазию. Можно вязать двухцветными, беря разные нити. При другой толщине нити может оказаться, что вспомогательная нить нужна другой длины. Проверьте это на своем образце шнурка 10см. Если нужен шнурок толще, берите две двойные нити и т.д. Как всегда. Не могу снимать 15секундные рилсы. А по…
❤158🔥79👍36🥰10
У меня новая "геометрия"😊. Квадраты были, теперь треугольники безотрывно. Лен Frescolino, 320м/100г, крючок 2,25. Цвет просто снос башки, кто меня понимает😂 Не знаю, есть ли он еще в @olindashop (темно-синий с проседью). Но я не согласна с синим, на синий он смахивает при искусственном освещении, а на самом деле из ряда графитовых слегка с синевой.
🔥372❤67👍20🏆6
Пост не про то, какая я молодец, а вот про что: Когда я связала 1й топ, я над ним ставила опыты "юного" химика😜 и он потерял блеск и приятную фактуру. А так как я очень хотела нормальный блестящий льняной топ этого цвета и пряжа была, начала вязать 2й. И меня ждал приятный сюрприз. 2я бобина этого льна оказалась толще. Пересчитала нити в скрутке: 1я 8-нитка, 2я 10-нитка. Приятный такой вот сюрприз. Помните моё пр…
🔥112❤33👍32
Все знают, как я люблю эти оттенки. Покажу еще серые льны в @olindashop . Один потемнее и похолоднее, второй потеплее с зеленцой ( но это при искусств.освещении). Я бы купила, но у меня таких оттенков дома штук 6. И 2 серых юбки уже есть. Это я к тому, что выкупили весь мой серый цвет со 2й юбки. Хорошо, что я в тот раз перестраховалась😎 И они 320/100, квадраты будут чуть больше, а это значит, что свяжется быстрее.…
❤87🔥63👍29🥰1
Текст выше.
🔥166👍28🥰7❤6
Потестировала арт. Linette Pailettes, 80% лен, 20% (полиэстер+ пайетки), 420м/100г, цвет Закатное золото из @olindashop . Связала поясную косынку по МК "Бабочки" (74г, на 10 квадратов, крючок 2,25, по гипотенузе 96см, в 1 нить). Вязалось нормально, трудностей не испытывала, за счет полиэстера нить уверенная. Опять же, я говорю только про этот цвет. Несколько раз у меня спрашивали про этот артикул на изделия, чтобы …
🔥130👍38❤14🥰6
Марьяна и ее "Просто Сетка". У меня была такая же до покраски.
🔥42❤14
Ой, девочки, Алена @alena_sergevna_ya сделала столько классных живых фотографий, что выбрать просто невозможно 💗 📍Вот такая потрясающая «Просто сетка» мне досталась в подарок от Викентии @vikentia_v ❤️Это был прямо приключенческий роман, как мы влюбились в РОЗОВЫЙ цвет льна у Алены и поехали за ним в Олинду @olindashop 😁 А это оказался не цвет, представляете?! 😂 А пропитка, которой иногда в Италии помечают партии…
🔥212❤56🥰10👍5😍5
Мой 1й опыт окрашивания. Краситель ВБ @294775433 для растительных волокон, для других составов там есть другие красители. МК "Просто Сетка" крючок 2,75 Лен Lino 260м/100г (@olindashop ) из предыдущих экспериментов по смытию розовой пропитки, см. выше в ленте, 300г, габариты 60*60см. Выбрала 4 концентрацию краски и стало чересчур темным, посмотрим, будет ли смываться, пока 2 стирки цвет на месте. Но опыт мне понрави…
👍122🔥72❤29
Про вчерашний эфир: https://vkvideo.ru/video-178966578_456248363
🔥55❤24👍24🥰2
Немного поверчусь сегодня перед вами в юбке новой и последнем Элементарном в 19ч эфире у Олинды https://vk.ru/olinda_shop_moscow А еще покажу интересный эксперимент со льном 🙂.
🔥101❤30👏14🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @vikentia_v. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@vikentia_v edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 141,149 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Викентия _ вязание” (@vikentia_v), 8,098 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vikentia_v.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.