Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Вика и Эфодина 🏁

@vikaandf1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

47subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002072218001
TypeChannel
Username@vikaandf1
DescriptionСмотрим гонки, болтаем обо всем на свете и радуемся жизни!
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vikaandf1

Growth

477 August 2026 — 47 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–48 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:3447no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:5247first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,570
Videos
105
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 31s
Average length
2m 16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍666.7%
👏222.2%
😁111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 May 2026, 20:00 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Хэй! А это я с новым видео! Болтаю о дельте... Если честно, с самого начала своего фанатства я задавалась вопросом: "а что же это вообще такое?". Оказывается, Вика из будущего что-то об этом знала! Если я упустила какие-то детали, пишите, буду рада новым фактам! ☺️

👍1

12 Apr 2026, 08:28 UTCviews —

Вика и Эфодина 🏁 pinned «Но все-таки начать с чего-то надо! Если бы вы знали, как долго я саботировала этот пост, сама не знаю, почему. Может, было как-то неловко снова тут появляться из-за того, что в этом сезоне сюда мало писала, ребята начали отписываться, но я очень благодарна…»

12 Apr 2026, 08:27 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

А это – одно из моих видео, тема получилась интересная, судя по отклику. А, и да, вот так я выгляжу, хоть познакомимся теперь 😁 Название аккаунта на обеих площадках: v.autory.v 📍Ссылочки: https://www.tiktok.com/@v.autory.v?_r=1&_t=ZS-95TSd3o3tmj https://www.instagram.com/v.autory.v?igsh=MXRrN2llcjFqdGZ1ZQ==

👍2

12 Apr 2026, 08:21 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Но все-таки начать с чего-то надо! Если бы вы знали, как долго я саботировала этот пост, сама не знаю, почему. Может, было как-то неловко снова тут появляться из-за того, что в этом сезоне сюда мало писала, ребята начали отписываться, но я очень благодарна тем, кто остался! И есть, наверное, здесь те, кто подписан на канал с самого его "рождения" и помнят, с чего на самом деле началась моя ЭрА ведения аккаунтов по а

👏2

7 Mar 2026, 05:12 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я даже не знаю в принципе, с чего начать 👉👈

😁1

7 Mar 2026, 05:11 UTC29 viewsread 10 August 2026

А... кхм... а почему ГП Австралии пока выглядит как какой-то прикольчик?

16 Dec 2025, 09:28 UTC53 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Гран-при Формулы 1 пройдут в 2027 и 2028 годах (и это как минимум). Интересно начинается межсезонье!

7 Dec 2025, 19:12 UTC45 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Специальное торжество заказывали? Гугл его предоставил! Если найти Ландо Норриса в Гугле сейчас, рядом с его фотографией из Википедии появится фейерверк с британским флагом! Можно еще на кнопочку справа нажать, тогда увидите еще один фейерверк. Количество "залпов" на одного пользователя, как я поняла, не ограничено 🎆

7 Dec 2025, 17:17 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026

Вообще, в автоспорте (в Ф1 преимущественно) должно сформироваться следующее правило: 1️⃣финишируем; 2️⃣выходим из болида; 3️⃣взвешиваемся; 4️⃣даем интервью (опционально); 5️⃣и СРАЗУ ЖЕ отключаем комментарии в социальных сетях. Только ПОТОМ брифинги, кушац, спац и далее по списку.

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @vikaandf1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вика и Эфодина 🏁” (@vikaandf1), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vikaandf1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.