Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
33,500 average views per post against 4,634 subscribers — an engagement rate of 722.0%. Across the 40,483 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.15% and 26.5%, with a median of 14.2%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
19 of 19 published in the window (1 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
635,726
Mature posts only
761.4% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,579–4,641 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 20:33
4,634
+48
6 Aug 2026, 18:24
4,586
-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:02
4,587
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:38
4,587
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
722.0%
avg views ÷ 4,634 subscribers
Avg views / post
33,500
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.347%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
19 (23 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
635,726
Reactions total
2,209
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 39s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,086 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
1,125
53.9%
🤬
296
14.2%
👍
184
8.82%
🙏
92
4.41%
😡
64
3.07%
😁
56
2.68%
😢
51
2.44%
❤
49
2.35%
🤔
39
1.87%
👏
36
1.73%
👎
28
1.34%
🔥
27
1.29%
😱
13
0.623%
💩
8
0.384%
🤡
7
0.336%
🤣
5
0.24%
🙈
3
0.144%
💊
2
0.096%
🤷
1
0.048%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Правда ни кому не нужна.
В Казахстане за решёткой оказался Аслан Толегенов. Человек, который попал в тюрьму из-за своей позиции. За свои взгляды и несогласие с политикой государства. Был против национализма, ваххабизма и всякого рода ЛГБТ проявлений. Выступал за укрепление и развитие отношений с Россией и был против того чтобы Казахстан был ориентирован на Запад.
Он остался один на один с системой. Желаю скорейшего…
Хабиб жалуется о том что потерял спонсоров.
Хабиб рассказывает что о том что, из-за того что он поддерживает Палестину, потерял спонсоров.
Хабиб снова говорит "А", но не говорит что Америка напрямую в этом участвует. Раз уж такой сердобольный, назови вещи своими именами. Смысл говорить о катастрофе в Палестине, но не говорить о том чьих это рук дело. Да и вообще, зачем что-то говорить, если ты и твоя команда, били…
Почему же хиджабы у салафитов и иудеев из Израиля похожи?
Уже писал про данную тему, о том что черный никаб, хиджаб у салафитов уж очень похож на одеяние сектантов в Израиле. Кто у кого скопировал большой вопрос. И кто кого породил, тоже.
Все суннитские страны в той или иной сфере (неофициально) контактируют с Израилем. Про Сирию так вообще молчу, у них, можно сказать добрососедские отношения с сионистами. В свое в…
Таджикистан, работа ведётся.
В городе Пенджикент Согдийской области Таджикистана прошли рейды против ношения "чуждой национальной культуре одежды".
По заявлению властей рейд проходит с целью предотвращения распространения иностранной культуры и защиты национальной идентичности и ценностей.
В Таджикистане действует закон который запрещает ввоз, продажу и ношение в общественном месте, чуждой национальной культуре од…
Цены на топливо для братьев.
В чем же истинная причина высоких цен на бензин в Дагестане? Высокая закупочная цена или простая братская жажда наживы? Запутанный клубок, который нужно распутывать.
Много говорится о высокой нравственности, о религиозности, о вере, одеваются хиджабы и бороды но ничего это не работает. Просто не страха, нет совести, одни понты и показуха.
Саудовская Аравия, Мекка. Охранники избивают паломников.
Сколько раз приходилось слышать; что только в исламе женщина по настоящему получила все права и свободу. Большие слова об уважении к женщине как к матери.
Что же мы видим на самом деле? Простое избиение охранниками женщин которые прилетели издалека, которые копили на это не один год. Попасть в это место и быть избитыми, такими же мусульманами.
Так что, когда…
Израиль продолжает захватывать земли Сирии не встречая сопротивления.
По данным СМИ Сирии: "С декабря 2024 года Израиль нанёс 1087 ударов по территории Сирии, 1199 раз вторгался на сирийскую территорию, провёл 208 задержаний и продвинулся более чем на 20 км вглубь сирийской территории".
Кстати о помощи в джихаде в Палестине, это что за джихад если он останавливается при виде сионистов и США? Если до этого они резал…
Куда сегодня едут джихадисты?
Ситуация в Сирии и Афганистане поменялась и на джихад так рьяно как раньше уже не бегут.
Но это не значит что всё хорошо. Если раньше этот контингент (салафиты), в случае какого-то конфликта уезжали на "священные земли джихада" и в этом был свой плюс для нас. То сегодня они работают на местах, ведя свою деятельность. И ждут подходящего случая. Почему ждут? Потому как салафит это джихад…
Авиасообщение между Сирией и Россией.
С 16 августа сирийская авиакомпания Syrian Airlines возобновляет рейсы в Москву. Об этом сообщил глава управления гражданской авиации и воздушного транспорта Сирии Умар аль-Хусари.
В 2015 году салафиты выезжающие на джихад об этом и мечтать не могли. Сегодня же это обычное "светское государство".
Пляж около Геленджика, ВСУ ударило по отдыхающим. Есть погибшие и раненые.
Это их лицо, это те с кем мы воюем сегодня. Что джихадисты, что нацисты, всё одно, это террористы. Это трусы, ничтожества, которые способны только на такое, другого и быть не могло.
Американцы в форме, события в Сеуте этому подтверждение. Возможно ли что-то подобное в России? Надеюсь нет. Но свои рычаги влияния в виде ваххабизма и мигрантов они имеют. А значит работу в этом направлении нужно продолжать.
По щелчку.
Конгрессмен Томас Мэсси заявил то что США и Израиль причастны к вторжению 70 тысяч мигрантов на испанский город Сеута:
"Две недели назад Палата представителей приняла законопроект, который дал зелёный свет на передачу испанской территории - Марокко.
Все республиканцы, кроме меня, проголосовали за него, но теперь ОНИ притворяются шокированными вторжением.
Весь этот раздел - безумие. Марокко претендует на…
💯74🤔9❤3😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vihodimama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 712,031 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кипиш Дагестана” (@vihodimama), 4,634 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vihodimama.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.