Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Выыдрыыы (выдры/otters)

@vidrochki

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,338subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001228014634
TypeChannel
Username@vidrochki
Created17 May 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vidrochki

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Выыдрыыы — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

5,3355,3385,336.56 August 2026 — 5,336 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,336 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,335 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,336 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,338 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,335–5,338 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:555,338+2
9 Aug 2026, 17:525,336+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:015,335-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:005,336no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:565,336first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.49%
avg views ÷ 5,338 subscribers
Avg views / post
346
82 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
82
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held82 (5 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total28,388
Reactions total2,572
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23m 43s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,076 reactions across 65 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,41268.0%
custom 580996616154618729332015.4%
custom 581193180057384209421010.1%
custom 5810076112708964735944.53%
custom 5809704877210735133261.25%
🎉140.674%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,572reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC236 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ваку как Мелонпан, начал вороватт тапки🐾

27custom 58097048772107351335custom 58099661615461872931custom 58100761127089647351

11 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC228 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @OtterologyPhoto

Выдра в зимнем пейзаже сибирской реки Источник: Уральский следопыт

20custom 58099661615461872933

11 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC238 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @KedyFedorVideo

- раз крючочек, два крючочек… руки убери, так нечестно!

21custom 58099661615461872938custom 58100761127089647351

11 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC313 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Пино ходиль в магазин, принёс пакет корма для рыбовых. усталь 😪🦦

34custom 58099661615461872934custom 58100761127089647351

11 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC338 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мока

30custom 58099661615461872939custom 58097048772107351331custom 58100761127089647351

11 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC234 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @plan_kinakiPhoto

Фото со свадебной фотосессии хозяина #Degensi 😍👰🤵

27🎉7custom 58099661615461872937custom 58100761127089647351

11 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC343 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

20custom 580996616154618729310custom 58100761127089647351

11 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC402 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Лучший сотрудник севэн илэвн💵💵💵

custom 58119318005738420942319custom 58099661615461872938custom 58100761127089647351

11 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC342 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Бервик, Мэйвис и ДиДи, выдруны-подростки из зоо Торонто в большом бассейне с мамой Мейбл.

18custom 58119318005738420949custom 58100761127089647351

11 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC355 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

У Сплэша всё хорошо, свой бассейн, территория. Куры соседские в гости ходят😂

24custom 581193180057384209413custom 58100761127089647351

11 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC356 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

В семье Бинго и Белль обнаружен полотенчиковый воришка🐾🐾

17custom 58119318005738420948custom 58100761127089647351

11 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC352 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Pocket & Emmet. Кармашек хочет просто поваляться, а Эммету нужна активная компания. Хорошо, что эти осиротевшие выдрунчики растут вместе.

24custom 581193180057384209413

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @vidrochki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 121,374 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Выыдрыыы (выдры/otters)” (@vidrochki), 5,338 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vidrochki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.