Posted without readable text
❤2🔥2❤🔥1🤝1

Channel
@vidgipro
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
95subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002253171416 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vidgipro |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vidgipro |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 95 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 96 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 96 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 23 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
93 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 27 | 29.0% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 23.7% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 14.0% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 11.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 9.68% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 4.30% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.23% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 3.23% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤2🔥2❤🔥1🤝1
Делимся кейсом! Логотип, фирменный стиль и сайт для mycellium.ru 🧡 Задача - Создать лаконичный фирменный стиль, не ассоциирующийся со спорами грибов или прямыми образами мицелия. Так как название компании - это метафора распространения их продукта на рынке. Компания создаёт платёжные и финансовые сервисы для бизнеса. Помогает внедрять электронные кошельки и другие финансовые инструменты под брендом клиента. И вот …
❤🔥3🔥3
Делимся новым промтом! Очень забавно и карикатурно! Заходим в chatgpt.com, прикрепляем свои фото и пишем: Extreme 3D CGI caricature of [character]—extremely exaggerated proportions and oversized features for maximum comic effect. A head-and-shoulders portrait, incredibly stylized with bold, dramatic expressions. Ultra-smooth matte materials. Character perspective. A saturated background creating strong visual contr…
❤3👍2🔥2
Ну что, делиться с вами еще промтами?
Shares as published, totalling 20%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что о нас говорят наши заказчики💜
❤5🥰4😁4🔥1
Подсмотрела у Леси Гусевой, классного иллюстратора, прикольный промт «Как бы вы выглядели, если б были персонажем мультика Смешарики» ( по этой же аналогии можно использовать любой мультик и стиль его персонажей)😁 Промт: Создай по приложенным фото оригинального персонажа в стиле «Смешариков». Фото с героями используй как референс стиля, а фото человека — как основу для внешности. Персонаж должен быть не человеком…
😁3❤1
Video, posted without a caption
😁6❤5💯3🔥1
Три причины обратиться 👇 ✨ Причина №1 В VIDGI мы закрываем весь цикл задач: от стратегии, нейминга и фирменного стиля до упаковки, полиграфии, сайтов, презентаций и рекламных материалов. Один подрядчик вместо десяти разных исполнителей. 🛠 Причина №2 Если у вас нет собственного отдела дизайна. У нас есть формат дизайн-поддержки: регулярно решаем текущие задачи бизнеса, помогаем с рекламой, соцсетями, полиграфией,…
🔥7👍3👏3
Сегодня ехала в такси, и там играла музыка из 80-90х из качественных динамиков. И я подумала - а тут 100% органическая музыка... "Органическая музыка"... как звучит. Так я назвала музыку полностью созданную человеком. А что если мы последнее поколение, которое застало искусство созданное настоящим интеллектом, а не искусственным. С характером автора, стилем, самовыражением, с погрешностью, не доведенное до идеала, на…
🔥4
Хотите популярный сейчас Промт? Зайдите в GPT и напишите: Turn the person from the photo into a grotesque humorous fashion caricature sketch. Strongly exaggerated anatomy, elongated proportions, expressive crooked hands, dramatic face, awkward elegant posture, satirical fashion energy, messy ink lines, rough watercolor, sketchbook style, vintage magazine illustration on beige aged paper. Add handwritten Russian n…
🔥3❤🔥2👍2
Сегодня я была на конкурсе «Галерея рекламы» в роли члена жюри в номинации «Фирменный стиль». https://t.me/GRfest_2025 Судили вместе с Юлией Вялкиной - арт‑директором, графическим дизайнером и партнёром студии «Vyalkina & Kojuharova». @Julia_Vyalkina Мы быстро сошлись во мнении на оценках номинантов и классно поболтали. Заодно пообщалась с народной артисткой России Анитой Цой, которая возглавляет Институт креатив…
🔥4❤3👍1
Прекрасные дамы! Команда vidgi.pro поздравляет Вас с 8 марта!
❤🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @vidgipro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ну что, делиться с вами еще промтами?
Shares as published, totalling 20%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 23 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VIDGI.PRO” (@vidgipro), 95 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vidgipro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.